体外冲击波疗法对慢性非特异性腰背痛患者的立竿见影效果:随机安慰剂对照三盲试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1177/02692155241251844
Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Rafaela Peron, Camilla Vitória Rios Lopes, João Victor Estevam de Souza, Richard Eloin Liebano
{"title":"体外冲击波疗法对慢性非特异性腰背痛患者的立竿见影效果:随机安慰剂对照三盲试验。","authors":"Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Rafaela Peron, Camilla Vitória Rios Lopes, João Victor Estevam de Souza, Richard Eloin Liebano","doi":"10.1177/02692155241251844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; <i>p</i> < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1080-1090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomised placebo-controlled triple-blind trial.\",\"authors\":\"Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Rafaela Peron, Camilla Vitória Rios Lopes, João Victor Estevam de Souza, Richard Eloin Liebano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241251844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; <i>p</i> < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1080-1090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241251844\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241251844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较冲击波疗法对慢性非特异性腰背痛患者的直接效果:随机安慰剂对照研究,分为三个干预组:本研究招募的患者于2022年5月至7月期间在基层医疗机构接受物理治疗:随机招募81名年龄在18-80岁、疼痛时间≥3个月、疼痛强度≥3级的慢性非特异性腰背痛患者参与研究:患者接受一次放射状冲击波治疗,放电2000次,能量100 mJ,频率5 Hz,使用凹面或凸面尖端或安慰剂治疗:主要指标:主要指标是干预后的疼痛强度。次要结果是压力痛阈值、疼痛的时间累加和功能表现。在基线和干预后收集数据:结果:凹面尖端组干预后的疼痛强度平均降低两点(95% CI = -3.6,-0.4;p p p p 结论:凹面冲击波疗法能有效减轻慢性非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛和局部痛觉减退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Immediate effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomised placebo-controlled triple-blind trial.

Objective: To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Design: Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups.

Setting: The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022.

Participants: Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study.

Intervention: The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment.

Main measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention.

Results: The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; p < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; p < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; p < 0.01) than in the placebo group.

Conclusion: The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1