使用机器人技术植入牙齿的准确性。体外研究的系统回顾。

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2669Ravipati14
V Ravipati, J Mathews, M Altuhafy, R Nagi, J Khan
{"title":"使用机器人技术植入牙齿的准确性。体外研究的系统回顾。","authors":"V Ravipati, J Mathews, M Altuhafy, R Nagi, J Khan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2669Ravipati14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim: </strong>Robotic-assisted techniques have the potential to revolutionize dental implantology by offering enhanced precision, accuracy, and clinical outcomes compared to computer-assisted implant placement techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of dental implant placement using robot-assisted implant surgery in vitro settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An unrestricted search of indexed databases along with a manual search was performed up to March 2024. In vitro, studies comparing the positioning accuracy of robotic systems in dental implant placement of planned pre-operative coordinates and postoperative outcomes in phantom and simulated models were included. QUIN Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 13 in vitro studies were included. All studies except one used entry, exit, or angle deviation as parameters to assess the accuracy of implants placed on phantom models or simulated virtual implant placement. Overall, pooled entry deviations were 0.72 ± 0.68 mm, exit deviations were 0.86 ± 0.92 mm, and angular deviations were 1.47 ± 1.610 favoring robot-assisted implant surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current evidence, robotic-placed implants have the potential to revolutionize dental implantology by offering enhanced precision, accuracy, and clinical outcomes compared to dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement using Robotics. A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies.\",\"authors\":\"V Ravipati, J Mathews, M Altuhafy, R Nagi, J Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2669Ravipati14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose/aim: </strong>Robotic-assisted techniques have the potential to revolutionize dental implantology by offering enhanced precision, accuracy, and clinical outcomes compared to computer-assisted implant placement techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of dental implant placement using robot-assisted implant surgery in vitro settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An unrestricted search of indexed databases along with a manual search was performed up to March 2024. In vitro, studies comparing the positioning accuracy of robotic systems in dental implant placement of planned pre-operative coordinates and postoperative outcomes in phantom and simulated models were included. QUIN Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 13 in vitro studies were included. All studies except one used entry, exit, or angle deviation as parameters to assess the accuracy of implants placed on phantom models or simulated virtual implant placement. Overall, pooled entry deviations were 0.72 ± 0.68 mm, exit deviations were 0.86 ± 0.92 mm, and angular deviations were 1.47 ± 1.610 favoring robot-assisted implant surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current evidence, robotic-placed implants have the potential to revolutionize dental implantology by offering enhanced precision, accuracy, and clinical outcomes compared to dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2669Ravipati14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2669Ravipati14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/宗旨:与计算机辅助种植体植入技术相比,机器人辅助技术具有更高的精确度、准确性和临床效果,因此有望彻底改变牙科种植技术。本研究旨在评估体外环境下使用机器人辅助种植手术进行牙科种植体植入的准确性:截至 2024 年 3 月,对索引数据库进行了无限制检索,并进行了人工检索。体外研究包括比较机器人系统在牙科种植体植入中的定位精度、计划的术前坐标以及在模型和模拟模型中的术后结果。使用 QUIN 工具对纳入研究的质量进行评估:结果:共纳入了 13 项体外研究。除一项研究外,其他所有研究均使用入口、出口或角度偏差作为参数,以评估在模型或模拟虚拟模型上植入种植体的准确性。总体而言,汇总的入口偏差为 0.72 ± 0.68 mm,出口偏差为 0.86 ± 0.92 mm,角度偏差为 1.47 ± 1.610,均支持机器人辅助种植手术:根据目前的证据,与动态和静态计算机辅助种植手术技术相比,机器人辅助种植手术具有更高的精确度、准确性和临床效果,有可能给牙科种植带来革命性的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement using Robotics. A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies.

Purpose/aim: Robotic-assisted techniques have the potential to revolutionize dental implantology by offering enhanced precision, accuracy, and clinical outcomes compared to computer-assisted implant placement techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of dental implant placement using robot-assisted implant surgery in vitro settings.

Methods: An unrestricted search of indexed databases along with a manual search was performed up to March 2024. In vitro, studies comparing the positioning accuracy of robotic systems in dental implant placement of planned pre-operative coordinates and postoperative outcomes in phantom and simulated models were included. QUIN Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

Result: A total of 13 in vitro studies were included. All studies except one used entry, exit, or angle deviation as parameters to assess the accuracy of implants placed on phantom models or simulated virtual implant placement. Overall, pooled entry deviations were 0.72 ± 0.68 mm, exit deviations were 0.86 ± 0.92 mm, and angular deviations were 1.47 ± 1.610 favoring robot-assisted implant surgery.

Conclusion: Based on the current evidence, robotic-placed implants have the potential to revolutionize dental implantology by offering enhanced precision, accuracy, and clinical outcomes compared to dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Does the Incorporation of Graphene Oxide into PMMA Influence its Antimicrobial Activity? Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement using Robotics. A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies. Influence of Different Undercut Depths of Clasp Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting on Retentive Force. Long-Term Bonding Efficacy of CAD/CAM Hybrid Restorative Materials and Universal Adhesives. Clinical Performance of Short Fibre-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Carious Lesions: 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1