Christopher Zuidema, Jianzhao Bi, Dustin Burnham, Nancy Carmona, Amanda J Gassett, David L Slager, Cooper Schumacher, Elena Austin, Edmund Seto, Adam A Szpiro, Lianne Sheppard
{"title":"利用低成本传感器预测二氧化氮,进行流行病学暴露评估。","authors":"Christopher Zuidema, Jianzhao Bi, Dustin Burnham, Nancy Carmona, Amanda J Gassett, David L Slager, Cooper Schumacher, Elena Austin, Edmund Seto, Adam A Szpiro, Lianne Sheppard","doi":"10.1038/s41370-024-00667-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Statistical models of air pollution enable intra-urban characterization of pollutant concentrations, benefiting exposure assessment for environmental epidemiology. The new generation of low-cost sensors facilitate the deployment of dense monitoring networks and can potentially be used to improve intra-urban models of air pollution.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and evaluate a spatiotemporal model for nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) in the Puget Sound region of WA, USA for the Adult Changes in Thought Air Pollution (ACT-AP) study and assess the contribution of low-cost sensor data to the model's performance through cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a spatiotemporal NO<sub>2</sub> model for the study region incorporating data from 11 agency locations, 364 supplementary monitoring locations, and 117 low-cost sensor (LCS) locations for the 1996-2020 time period. Model features included long-term time trends and dimension-reduced land use regression. We evaluated the contribution of LCS network data by comparing models fit with and without sensor data using cross-validated (CV) summary performance statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performing model had one time trend and geographic covariates summarized into three partial least squares components. The model, fit with LCS data, performed as well as other recent studies (agency cross-validation: CV- root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.5 ppb NO<sub>2</sub>; CV- coefficient of determination ( <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> ) = 0.85). Predictions of NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations developed with LCS were higher at residential locations compared to a model without LCS, especially in recent years. While LCS did not provide a strong performance gain at agency sites (CV-RMSE = 2.8 ppb NO<sub>2</sub>; CV- <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> = 0.82 without LCS), at residential locations, the improvement was substantial, with RMSE = 3.8 ppb NO<sub>2</sub> and <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> = 0.08 (without LCS), compared to CV-RMSE = 2.8 ppb NO<sub>2</sub> and CV- <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> = 0.51 (with LCS).</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>We developed a spatiotemporal model for nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) pollution in Washington's Puget Sound region for epidemiologic exposure assessment for the Adult Changes in Thought Air Pollution study. We examined the impact of including low-cost sensor data in the NO<sub>2</sub> model and found the additional spatial information the sensors provided predicted NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations that were higher than without low-cost sensors, particularly in recent years. We did not observe a clear, substantial improvement in cross-validation performance over a similar model fit without low-cost sensor data; however, the prediction improvement with low-cost sensors at residential locations was substantial. The performance gains from low-cost sensors may have been attenuated due to spatial information provided by other supplementary monitoring data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging low-cost sensors to predict nitrogen dioxide for epidemiologic exposure assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Zuidema, Jianzhao Bi, Dustin Burnham, Nancy Carmona, Amanda J Gassett, David L Slager, Cooper Schumacher, Elena Austin, Edmund Seto, Adam A Szpiro, Lianne Sheppard\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41370-024-00667-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Statistical models of air pollution enable intra-urban characterization of pollutant concentrations, benefiting exposure assessment for environmental epidemiology. The new generation of low-cost sensors facilitate the deployment of dense monitoring networks and can potentially be used to improve intra-urban models of air pollution.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and evaluate a spatiotemporal model for nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) in the Puget Sound region of WA, USA for the Adult Changes in Thought Air Pollution (ACT-AP) study and assess the contribution of low-cost sensor data to the model's performance through cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a spatiotemporal NO<sub>2</sub> model for the study region incorporating data from 11 agency locations, 364 supplementary monitoring locations, and 117 low-cost sensor (LCS) locations for the 1996-2020 time period. Model features included long-term time trends and dimension-reduced land use regression. We evaluated the contribution of LCS network data by comparing models fit with and without sensor data using cross-validated (CV) summary performance statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performing model had one time trend and geographic covariates summarized into three partial least squares components. The model, fit with LCS data, performed as well as other recent studies (agency cross-validation: CV- root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.5 ppb NO<sub>2</sub>; CV- coefficient of determination ( <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> ) = 0.85). Predictions of NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations developed with LCS were higher at residential locations compared to a model without LCS, especially in recent years. While LCS did not provide a strong performance gain at agency sites (CV-RMSE = 2.8 ppb NO<sub>2</sub>; CV- <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> = 0.82 without LCS), at residential locations, the improvement was substantial, with RMSE = 3.8 ppb NO<sub>2</sub> and <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> = 0.08 (without LCS), compared to CV-RMSE = 2.8 ppb NO<sub>2</sub> and CV- <math> <msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> = 0.51 (with LCS).</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>We developed a spatiotemporal model for nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) pollution in Washington's Puget Sound region for epidemiologic exposure assessment for the Adult Changes in Thought Air Pollution study. We examined the impact of including low-cost sensor data in the NO<sub>2</sub> model and found the additional spatial information the sensors provided predicted NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations that were higher than without low-cost sensors, particularly in recent years. We did not observe a clear, substantial improvement in cross-validation performance over a similar model fit without low-cost sensor data; however, the prediction improvement with low-cost sensors at residential locations was substantial. The performance gains from low-cost sensors may have been attenuated due to spatial information provided by other supplementary monitoring data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00667-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00667-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Leveraging low-cost sensors to predict nitrogen dioxide for epidemiologic exposure assessment.
Background: Statistical models of air pollution enable intra-urban characterization of pollutant concentrations, benefiting exposure assessment for environmental epidemiology. The new generation of low-cost sensors facilitate the deployment of dense monitoring networks and can potentially be used to improve intra-urban models of air pollution.
Objective: Develop and evaluate a spatiotemporal model for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the Puget Sound region of WA, USA for the Adult Changes in Thought Air Pollution (ACT-AP) study and assess the contribution of low-cost sensor data to the model's performance through cross-validation.
Methods: We developed a spatiotemporal NO2 model for the study region incorporating data from 11 agency locations, 364 supplementary monitoring locations, and 117 low-cost sensor (LCS) locations for the 1996-2020 time period. Model features included long-term time trends and dimension-reduced land use regression. We evaluated the contribution of LCS network data by comparing models fit with and without sensor data using cross-validated (CV) summary performance statistics.
Results: The best performing model had one time trend and geographic covariates summarized into three partial least squares components. The model, fit with LCS data, performed as well as other recent studies (agency cross-validation: CV- root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.5 ppb NO2; CV- coefficient of determination ( ) = 0.85). Predictions of NO2 concentrations developed with LCS were higher at residential locations compared to a model without LCS, especially in recent years. While LCS did not provide a strong performance gain at agency sites (CV-RMSE = 2.8 ppb NO2; CV- = 0.82 without LCS), at residential locations, the improvement was substantial, with RMSE = 3.8 ppb NO2 and = 0.08 (without LCS), compared to CV-RMSE = 2.8 ppb NO2 and CV- = 0.51 (with LCS).
Impact: We developed a spatiotemporal model for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution in Washington's Puget Sound region for epidemiologic exposure assessment for the Adult Changes in Thought Air Pollution study. We examined the impact of including low-cost sensor data in the NO2 model and found the additional spatial information the sensors provided predicted NO2 concentrations that were higher than without low-cost sensors, particularly in recent years. We did not observe a clear, substantial improvement in cross-validation performance over a similar model fit without low-cost sensor data; however, the prediction improvement with low-cost sensors at residential locations was substantial. The performance gains from low-cost sensors may have been attenuated due to spatial information provided by other supplementary monitoring data.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines.
JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.