基于机器学习的急诊室中风预测。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241239108
Vida Abedi, Debdipto Misra, Durgesh Chaudhary, Venkatesh Avula, Clemens M Schirmer, Jiang Li, Ramin Zand
{"title":"基于机器学习的急诊室中风预测。","authors":"Vida Abedi, Debdipto Misra, Durgesh Chaudhary, Venkatesh Avula, Clemens M Schirmer, Jiang Li, Ramin Zand","doi":"10.1177/17562864241239108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke misdiagnosis, associated with poor outcomes, is estimated to occur in 9% of all stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that machine learning (ML) could assist in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke in emergency departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was conducted and reported according to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines. We performed model development and prospective temporal validation, using data from pre- and post-COVID periods; we also performed a case study on a small cohort of previously misdiagnosed stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used structured and unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) of 56,452 patient encounters from 13 hospitals in Pennsylvania, from September 2003 to January 2021. ML pipelines, including natural language processing, were created using pre-event clinical data and provider notes in the EDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using pre-event information, our model's area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) ranged from 0.88 to 0.92 with a similar range accuracy (0.87-0.90). Using provider notes, we identified five models that reached a balanced performance in terms of AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Model AUROC ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. Model sensitivity and specificity reached 0.90 and 0.99, respectively. Four of the top five performing models were based on the post-COVID provider notes; however, no performance difference between models tested on pre- and post-COVID was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study leveraged pre-event and at-encounter level EHR for stroke prediction. The results indicate that available clinical information can be used for building EHR-based stroke prediction models and ED stroke alert systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10989051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Stroke in Emergency Departments.\",\"authors\":\"Vida Abedi, Debdipto Misra, Durgesh Chaudhary, Venkatesh Avula, Clemens M Schirmer, Jiang Li, Ramin Zand\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562864241239108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke misdiagnosis, associated with poor outcomes, is estimated to occur in 9% of all stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that machine learning (ML) could assist in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke in emergency departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was conducted and reported according to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines. We performed model development and prospective temporal validation, using data from pre- and post-COVID periods; we also performed a case study on a small cohort of previously misdiagnosed stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used structured and unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) of 56,452 patient encounters from 13 hospitals in Pennsylvania, from September 2003 to January 2021. ML pipelines, including natural language processing, were created using pre-event clinical data and provider notes in the EDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using pre-event information, our model's area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) ranged from 0.88 to 0.92 with a similar range accuracy (0.87-0.90). Using provider notes, we identified five models that reached a balanced performance in terms of AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Model AUROC ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. Model sensitivity and specificity reached 0.90 and 0.99, respectively. Four of the top five performing models were based on the post-COVID provider notes; however, no performance difference between models tested on pre- and post-COVID was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study leveraged pre-event and at-encounter level EHR for stroke prediction. The results indicate that available clinical information can be used for building EHR-based stroke prediction models and ED stroke alert systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10989051/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241239108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241239108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据估计,9% 的中风患者会被误诊:据估计,在所有中风患者中,有 9% 的患者会被误诊为中风,这与不良预后有关:我们假设机器学习(ML)可以帮助急诊科(ED)诊断缺血性中风:设计:本研究根据《个人预后或诊断多变量预测模型透明报告指南》进行并报告。我们使用 COVID 前后的数据进行了模型开发和前瞻性时间验证;我们还对之前误诊的一小部分卒中患者进行了病例研究:我们使用了宾夕法尼亚州 13 家医院从 2003 年 9 月到 2021 年 1 月期间 56,452 次患者就诊的结构化和非结构化电子健康记录(EHR)。利用事件发生前的临床数据和急诊室提供者的记录创建了包括自然语言处理在内的 ML 管道:使用事件发生前的信息,我们的模型的接收者工作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 在 0.88 到 0.92 之间,精确度范围相似(0.87-0.90)。通过使用提供者笔记,我们确定了五个在 AUROC、灵敏度和特异性方面表现均衡的模型。模型的 AUROC 在 0.93 到 0.99 之间。模型灵敏度和特异性分别达到 0.90 和 0.99。在表现最好的五个模型中,有四个是基于 COVID 后的医疗服务提供者笔记;但是,在 COVID 前和后测试的模型之间没有观察到性能差异:本研究利用事件前和就诊时的电子病历进行中风预测。结果表明,可用的临床信息可用于建立基于 EHR 的卒中预测模型和 ED 卒中警报系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Stroke in Emergency Departments.

Background: Stroke misdiagnosis, associated with poor outcomes, is estimated to occur in 9% of all stroke patients.

Objectives: We hypothesized that machine learning (ML) could assist in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke in emergency departments (EDs).

Design: The study was conducted and reported according to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines. We performed model development and prospective temporal validation, using data from pre- and post-COVID periods; we also performed a case study on a small cohort of previously misdiagnosed stroke patients.

Methods: We used structured and unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) of 56,452 patient encounters from 13 hospitals in Pennsylvania, from September 2003 to January 2021. ML pipelines, including natural language processing, were created using pre-event clinical data and provider notes in the EDs.

Results: Using pre-event information, our model's area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) ranged from 0.88 to 0.92 with a similar range accuracy (0.87-0.90). Using provider notes, we identified five models that reached a balanced performance in terms of AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Model AUROC ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. Model sensitivity and specificity reached 0.90 and 0.99, respectively. Four of the top five performing models were based on the post-COVID provider notes; however, no performance difference between models tested on pre- and post-COVID was observed.

Conclusion: This study leveraged pre-event and at-encounter level EHR for stroke prediction. The results indicate that available clinical information can be used for building EHR-based stroke prediction models and ED stroke alert systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality under treatment with GLP-1 RAs or the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and device-based predictors of improved experience of activities of daily living after a multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for people with Parkinson's disease: a cohort study. Maintenance of zilucoplan efficacy in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis up to 24 weeks: a model-informed analysis. Targeting dorsal root ganglia for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: from bench to bedside. CYP2C19 genotype and sodium channel blockers in lacosamide-treated children with epilepsy: two major determinants of trough lacosamide concentration or clinical response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1