接种方法影响零售桃和果园桃上肠炎沙门氏菌的存活率。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100289
Bashayer A. Khouja , Joelle K. Salazar , Hetvi Babaria , Megan L. Fay , Diana S. Stewart
{"title":"接种方法影响零售桃和果园桃上肠炎沙门氏菌的存活率。","authors":"Bashayer A. Khouja ,&nbsp;Joelle K. Salazar ,&nbsp;Hetvi Babaria ,&nbsp;Megan L. Fay ,&nbsp;Diana S. Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Challenge studies associated with fruits and vegetables generally utilize wet bacterial inoculation methods. However, a recent salmonellosis outbreak in the U.S. was linked to peaches plausibly contaminated via fugitive dust from a nearby animal operation. This outbreak has highlighted the need for a suitable inert carrier which can be used for the dry transfer of <em>Salmonella enterica</em> to produce. The purpose of this study was 1) to examine the population stability of <em>S. enterica</em> and its surrogate, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em>, in different dry matrices during extended storage to identify suitable carriers and 2) to evaluate the survival of <em>S. enterica</em> on peaches based on the mode of contamination (i.e., wet <em>vs</em>. dry). <em>S. enterica</em> and <em>E. faecium</em> were cultivated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and inoculated into corn-cob small animal litter, sand, or silica at 10–11 log CFU/g. Matrices were mixed by hand and stored at 25°C and 33% relative humidity for up to 120 d. <em>S. enterica</em> remained relatively stable in the silica and litter, with no significant decrease in population after 14 and 28 d, respectively. <em>E. faecium</em> significantly reduced in all matrices, with the greatest reduction observed in silica (2.86 log CFU/g after 120 d). Additional carriers would need to be assessed for <em>E. faecium</em> which could maintain its population stability. Silica was ultimately selected for the dry carrier of <em>S. enterica</em>. Peaches available at retail or from orchards were inoculated with <em>S. enterica</em> using the silica carrier or by spot or dip inoculation methods at 5 log CFU/peach and stored at 5°C and 80% relative humidity for up to 28 d. The population of <em>S. enterica</em> significantly reduced on all peaches except for the dry inoculated orchard peaches, where the population remained stable (4.62 ± 0.35 log CFU/peach after 28 d). Results from this study determined that the mode of contamination influences the survival of <em>S. enterica</em> on peaches and that dry inoculation methods should be considered for produce in some instances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000735/pdfft?md5=64849bcb1f62723c65a0647030231b70&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000735-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method of Inoculation Influences the Survival of Salmonella enterica on Retail and Orchard Peaches\",\"authors\":\"Bashayer A. Khouja ,&nbsp;Joelle K. Salazar ,&nbsp;Hetvi Babaria ,&nbsp;Megan L. Fay ,&nbsp;Diana S. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Challenge studies associated with fruits and vegetables generally utilize wet bacterial inoculation methods. However, a recent salmonellosis outbreak in the U.S. was linked to peaches plausibly contaminated via fugitive dust from a nearby animal operation. This outbreak has highlighted the need for a suitable inert carrier which can be used for the dry transfer of <em>Salmonella enterica</em> to produce. The purpose of this study was 1) to examine the population stability of <em>S. enterica</em> and its surrogate, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em>, in different dry matrices during extended storage to identify suitable carriers and 2) to evaluate the survival of <em>S. enterica</em> on peaches based on the mode of contamination (i.e., wet <em>vs</em>. dry). <em>S. enterica</em> and <em>E. faecium</em> were cultivated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and inoculated into corn-cob small animal litter, sand, or silica at 10–11 log CFU/g. Matrices were mixed by hand and stored at 25°C and 33% relative humidity for up to 120 d. <em>S. enterica</em> remained relatively stable in the silica and litter, with no significant decrease in population after 14 and 28 d, respectively. <em>E. faecium</em> significantly reduced in all matrices, with the greatest reduction observed in silica (2.86 log CFU/g after 120 d). Additional carriers would need to be assessed for <em>E. faecium</em> which could maintain its population stability. Silica was ultimately selected for the dry carrier of <em>S. enterica</em>. Peaches available at retail or from orchards were inoculated with <em>S. enterica</em> using the silica carrier or by spot or dip inoculation methods at 5 log CFU/peach and stored at 5°C and 80% relative humidity for up to 28 d. The population of <em>S. enterica</em> significantly reduced on all peaches except for the dry inoculated orchard peaches, where the population remained stable (4.62 ± 0.35 log CFU/peach after 28 d). Results from this study determined that the mode of contamination influences the survival of <em>S. enterica</em> on peaches and that dry inoculation methods should be considered for produce in some instances.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000735/pdfft?md5=64849bcb1f62723c65a0647030231b70&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000735-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000735\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与水果和蔬菜有关的挑战研究通常采用湿式细菌接种法。然而,美国最近爆发的沙门氏菌病疫情与桃子有关,桃子可能受到了附近动物饲养场的飞尘污染。这次疫情突出表明,需要一种合适的惰性载体,用于将肠炎沙门氏菌干法转移到农产品中。本研究的目的是:1)检查肠炎沙门氏菌及其替代物粪肠球菌在不同干燥基质中长期储存期间的种群稳定性,以确定合适的载体;2)根据污染模式(即湿法与干法)评估肠炎沙门氏菌在桃子上的存活率。在胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂(TSA)上培养肠球菌和粪肠球菌,并以 10-11 log CFU/g 的浓度接种到玉米芯小动物粪便、沙子或硅石中。肠杆菌在白炭黑和沙土中保持相对稳定,分别在 14 天和 28 天后数量没有明显减少。粪肠球菌在所有基质中都明显减少,在二氧化硅中减少最多(120 天后为 2.86 log CFU/g)。需要对其他载体进行评估,以确保粪肠球菌的数量稳定。二氧化硅最终被选为肠杆菌的干载体。使用二氧化硅载体、点滴接种或浸渍接种法将零售或果园的桃子接种肠球菌,接种量为 5 log CFU/个,然后在 5°C 和 80% 的相对湿度下保存 28 d。这项研究的结果表明,污染模式会影响桃子上肠道病毒的存活率,在某些情况下,应考虑采用干法接种的方法来生产桃子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Method of Inoculation Influences the Survival of Salmonella enterica on Retail and Orchard Peaches

Challenge studies associated with fruits and vegetables generally utilize wet bacterial inoculation methods. However, a recent salmonellosis outbreak in the U.S. was linked to peaches plausibly contaminated via fugitive dust from a nearby animal operation. This outbreak has highlighted the need for a suitable inert carrier which can be used for the dry transfer of Salmonella enterica to produce. The purpose of this study was 1) to examine the population stability of S. enterica and its surrogate, Enterococcus faecium, in different dry matrices during extended storage to identify suitable carriers and 2) to evaluate the survival of S. enterica on peaches based on the mode of contamination (i.e., wet vs. dry). S. enterica and E. faecium were cultivated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and inoculated into corn-cob small animal litter, sand, or silica at 10–11 log CFU/g. Matrices were mixed by hand and stored at 25°C and 33% relative humidity for up to 120 d. S. enterica remained relatively stable in the silica and litter, with no significant decrease in population after 14 and 28 d, respectively. E. faecium significantly reduced in all matrices, with the greatest reduction observed in silica (2.86 log CFU/g after 120 d). Additional carriers would need to be assessed for E. faecium which could maintain its population stability. Silica was ultimately selected for the dry carrier of S. enterica. Peaches available at retail or from orchards were inoculated with S. enterica using the silica carrier or by spot or dip inoculation methods at 5 log CFU/peach and stored at 5°C and 80% relative humidity for up to 28 d. The population of S. enterica significantly reduced on all peaches except for the dry inoculated orchard peaches, where the population remained stable (4.62 ± 0.35 log CFU/peach after 28 d). Results from this study determined that the mode of contamination influences the survival of S. enterica on peaches and that dry inoculation methods should be considered for produce in some instances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
期刊最新文献
Isolation and Enumeration of the Bacillus cereus Group Using a Chromogenic Substrate that Targets Phosphatidylcholine Phospholipase C Activity. Evaluation of a postbiotic on Salmonella enterica prevalence, serotype diversity, and antimicrobial resistance in the subiliac lymph nodes of cull dairy cattle. Hazard characterization of antibiotic-resistant Aeromonas spp. isolated from mussel and oyster shellstock available for retail purchase in Canada. Generic Food Safety Assessment: A Framework to Evaluate Food Safety Hazards Emerging from Change(s) in the Primary Production System – A Case Study Involving Intercropping Investigation of Feedlot-level Use of a Direct-fed Microbial on Fecal Shedding of E. coli O157:H7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1