一线免疫疗法联合用药或酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌进行前期细胞清除性肾切除术的实际影响(ARON-1 回顾性研究的子分析)。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Targeted Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-05 DOI:10.1007/s11523-024-01065-w
Ondřej Fiala, Sebastiano Buti, Aristotelis Bamias, Francesco Massari, Renate Pichler, Marco Maruzzo, Enrique Grande, Ugo De Giorgi, Javier Molina-Cerrillo, Emmanuel Seront, Fabio Calabrò, Zin W Myint, Gaetano Facchini, Ray Manneh Kopp, Rossana Berardi, Jakub Kucharz, Maria Giuseppa Vitale, Alvaro Pinto, Luigi Formisano, Thomas Büttner, Carlo Messina, Fernando Sabino M Monteiro, Nicola Battelli, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Tomáš Büchler, Jindřich Kopecký, Daniele Santini, Giulia Claire Giudice, Camillo Porta, Matteo Santoni
{"title":"一线免疫疗法联合用药或酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌进行前期细胞清除性肾切除术的实际影响(ARON-1 回顾性研究的子分析)。","authors":"Ondřej Fiala, Sebastiano Buti, Aristotelis Bamias, Francesco Massari, Renate Pichler, Marco Maruzzo, Enrique Grande, Ugo De Giorgi, Javier Molina-Cerrillo, Emmanuel Seront, Fabio Calabrò, Zin W Myint, Gaetano Facchini, Ray Manneh Kopp, Rossana Berardi, Jakub Kucharz, Maria Giuseppa Vitale, Alvaro Pinto, Luigi Formisano, Thomas Büttner, Carlo Messina, Fernando Sabino M Monteiro, Nicola Battelli, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Tomáš Büchler, Jindřich Kopecký, Daniele Santini, Giulia Claire Giudice, Camillo Porta, Matteo Santoni","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01065-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About 20% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with non-clear cell histology (nccRCC), encompassing various histological types. While surgery remains pivotal for localized-stage nccRCC, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic nccRCC is contentious. Limited data exist on the role of CN in metastatic nccRCC under current standard of care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study focused on the impact of upfront CN on metastatic nccRCC outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 221 patients with nccRCC and synchronous metastatic disease, treated with IO combinations or TKI monotherapy in the first line. Baseline clinical characteristics, systemic therapy, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median OS for patients undergoing upfront CN was 36.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9-71.3) versus 20.8 (95% CI 12.6-24.8) months for those without CN (p = 0.005). Upfront CN was significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72], p < 0.001). In patients without CN, the median OS and PFS was 24.5 (95% CI 18.1-40.5) and 13.0 months (95% CI 6.6-23.5) for patients treated with IO+TKI versus 7.5 (95% CI 4.3-22.4) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.0-8.1) for those receiving the IO+IO combination (p = 0.059 and p = 0.032, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates the survival benefits of upfront CN compared with systemic therapy without CN. The study suggests that the use of IO+TKI combination or, eventually, TKI monotherapy might be a better choice than IO+IO combination for patients who are not candidates for CN regardless of IO eligibility. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine the role of CN in current mRCC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Impact of Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (A Sub-Analysis from the ARON-1 Retrospective Study).\",\"authors\":\"Ondřej Fiala, Sebastiano Buti, Aristotelis Bamias, Francesco Massari, Renate Pichler, Marco Maruzzo, Enrique Grande, Ugo De Giorgi, Javier Molina-Cerrillo, Emmanuel Seront, Fabio Calabrò, Zin W Myint, Gaetano Facchini, Ray Manneh Kopp, Rossana Berardi, Jakub Kucharz, Maria Giuseppa Vitale, Alvaro Pinto, Luigi Formisano, Thomas Büttner, Carlo Messina, Fernando Sabino M Monteiro, Nicola Battelli, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Tomáš Büchler, Jindřich Kopecký, Daniele Santini, Giulia Claire Giudice, Camillo Porta, Matteo Santoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11523-024-01065-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About 20% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with non-clear cell histology (nccRCC), encompassing various histological types. While surgery remains pivotal for localized-stage nccRCC, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic nccRCC is contentious. Limited data exist on the role of CN in metastatic nccRCC under current standard of care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study focused on the impact of upfront CN on metastatic nccRCC outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 221 patients with nccRCC and synchronous metastatic disease, treated with IO combinations or TKI monotherapy in the first line. Baseline clinical characteristics, systemic therapy, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median OS for patients undergoing upfront CN was 36.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9-71.3) versus 20.8 (95% CI 12.6-24.8) months for those without CN (p = 0.005). Upfront CN was significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72], p < 0.001). In patients without CN, the median OS and PFS was 24.5 (95% CI 18.1-40.5) and 13.0 months (95% CI 6.6-23.5) for patients treated with IO+TKI versus 7.5 (95% CI 4.3-22.4) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.0-8.1) for those receiving the IO+IO combination (p = 0.059 and p = 0.032, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates the survival benefits of upfront CN compared with systemic therapy without CN. The study suggests that the use of IO+TKI combination or, eventually, TKI monotherapy might be a better choice than IO+IO combination for patients who are not candidates for CN regardless of IO eligibility. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine the role of CN in current mRCC management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01065-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01065-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:约 20% 的肾细胞癌患者具有非透明细胞组织学(nccRCC),包括各种组织学类型。虽然手术对于局部阶段的 nccRCC 仍然至关重要,但细胞生殖性肾切除术(CN)在转移性 nccRCC 中的作用却存在争议。在目前的治疗标准下,关于细胞肾切除术在转移性 nccRCC 中的作用的数据十分有限:这项回顾性研究重点探讨了前期CN对一线免疫检查点抑制剂(IO)联合疗法或酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)单药疗法的转移性nccRCC疗效的影响:研究纳入了221例患有nccRCC和同步转移性疾病的患者,他们均接受了IO联合疗法或TKI单药一线治疗。对基线临床特征、系统治疗和治疗结果进行了分析。首要目标是评估临床结果,包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。统计分析包括费舍尔精确检验、皮尔逊相关系数、方差分析、卡普兰-梅耶法、对数秩检验和单变量/多变量考克斯比例危险回归模型:接受前期CN治疗的患者的中位OS为36.8个月(95%置信区间[CI] 24.9-71.3),而未接受CN治疗的患者的中位OS为20.8个月(95%置信区间[CI] 12.6-24.8)(P = 0.005)。在多变量考克斯回归分析中,前期CN与OS明显相关(危险比为0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72],p < 0.001)。在无CN的患者中,接受IO+TKI治疗的患者的中位OS和PFS分别为24.5个月(95% CI 18.1-40.5)和13.0个月(95% CI 6.6-23.5),而接受IO+IO联合治疗的患者的中位OS和PFS分别为7.5个月(95% CI 4.3-22.4)和4.9个月(95% CI 3.0-8.1)(p = 0.059和p = 0.032):我们的研究表明,与不使用CN的全身治疗相比,前期CN可为患者带来生存益处。该研究表明,对于不适合 CN 的患者,无论是否符合 IO 治疗条件,使用 IO+TKI 联合治疗或最终使用 TKI 单药治疗可能是比 IO+IO 联合治疗更好的选择。需要进行前瞻性试验来验证这些发现,并完善CN在当前mRCC治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World Impact of Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (A Sub-Analysis from the ARON-1 Retrospective Study).

Background: About 20% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with non-clear cell histology (nccRCC), encompassing various histological types. While surgery remains pivotal for localized-stage nccRCC, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic nccRCC is contentious. Limited data exist on the role of CN in metastatic nccRCC under current standard of care.

Objective: This retrospective study focused on the impact of upfront CN on metastatic nccRCC outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy.

Methods: The study included 221 patients with nccRCC and synchronous metastatic disease, treated with IO combinations or TKI monotherapy in the first line. Baseline clinical characteristics, systemic therapy, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Results: Median OS for patients undergoing upfront CN was 36.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9-71.3) versus 20.8 (95% CI 12.6-24.8) months for those without CN (p = 0.005). Upfront CN was significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72], p < 0.001). In patients without CN, the median OS and PFS was 24.5 (95% CI 18.1-40.5) and 13.0 months (95% CI 6.6-23.5) for patients treated with IO+TKI versus 7.5 (95% CI 4.3-22.4) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.0-8.1) for those receiving the IO+IO combination (p = 0.059 and p = 0.032, respectively).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the survival benefits of upfront CN compared with systemic therapy without CN. The study suggests that the use of IO+TKI combination or, eventually, TKI monotherapy might be a better choice than IO+IO combination for patients who are not candidates for CN regardless of IO eligibility. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine the role of CN in current mRCC management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
期刊最新文献
Physician Perspectives on the Management of Patients with Resected High-Risk Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Who Are Ineligible to Receive Cisplatin: A Podcast. Pancreatitis in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Taiwan Nationwide Study of First-Line ALK-TKI Therapy in ALK-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma. Single-Hit and Multi-hit PIK3CA Short Variant Genomic Alterations in Clinically Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Genomic Landscape Study. Impact of Etiology on Efficacy Outcomes with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multinational Retrospective Analysis in Asia-Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1