社区合作共同开发干预措施,促进儿科人群公平接种 COVID-19 疫苗。

Delaware journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-03-29 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.32481/djph.2024.03.06
Paul T Enlow, Courtney Thomas, Angel Munoz Osorio, Marshala Lee, Jonathan M Miller, Lavisha Pelaez, Anne E Kazak, Thao-Ly T Phan
{"title":"社区合作共同开发干预措施,促进儿科人群公平接种 COVID-19 疫苗。","authors":"Paul T Enlow, Courtney Thomas, Angel Munoz Osorio, Marshala Lee, Jonathan M Miller, Lavisha Pelaez, Anne E Kazak, Thao-Ly T Phan","doi":"10.32481/djph.2024.03.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the process of engaging community, caregiver, and youth partners in codeveloping an intervention to promote equitable uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine in non-Hispanic Black (Black) and Hispanic youth who experience higher rates of COVID-19 transmission, morbidity, and mortality but were less likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team of 11 Black and Hispanic community partners was assembled to codevelop intervention strategies with our interdisciplinary research team. We used a mixed-methods crowdsourcing approach with Black and Hispanic youth (n=15) and caregivers of Black and Hispanic youth (n=20) who had not yet been vaccinated against COVID-19, recruited from primary care clinics, to elicit perspectives on the acceptability of these intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We codeveloped five strategies: (1) community-tailored handouts and posters, (2) videos featuring local youth, (3) family-centered language to offer vaccines in the primary care clinic, (4) communication-skills training for primary care providers, and (5) use of community health workers to counsel families about the vaccine. The majority (56-96.9%) of youth and caregivers rated each of these strategies as acceptable, especially because they addressed common concerns and facilitated shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging community and family partners led to the co-development of culturally- and locally-tailored strategies to promote dialogue and shared decision-making about the COVID-19 vaccine. This process can be used to codevelop interventions to address other forms of public health disparities.</p><p><strong>Policy implications: </strong>Intervention strategies that promote dialogues with trusted healthcare providers and support shared decision-making are acceptable strategies to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake among youth from historically underserved communities. Stakeholder-engaged methods may also help in the development of interventions to address other forms of health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72774,"journal":{"name":"Delaware journal of public health","volume":"10 1","pages":"30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10987021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Partnership to Co-Develop an Intervention to Promote Equitable Uptake of the COVID-19 Vaccine Among Pediatric Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Paul T Enlow, Courtney Thomas, Angel Munoz Osorio, Marshala Lee, Jonathan M Miller, Lavisha Pelaez, Anne E Kazak, Thao-Ly T Phan\",\"doi\":\"10.32481/djph.2024.03.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the process of engaging community, caregiver, and youth partners in codeveloping an intervention to promote equitable uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine in non-Hispanic Black (Black) and Hispanic youth who experience higher rates of COVID-19 transmission, morbidity, and mortality but were less likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team of 11 Black and Hispanic community partners was assembled to codevelop intervention strategies with our interdisciplinary research team. We used a mixed-methods crowdsourcing approach with Black and Hispanic youth (n=15) and caregivers of Black and Hispanic youth (n=20) who had not yet been vaccinated against COVID-19, recruited from primary care clinics, to elicit perspectives on the acceptability of these intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We codeveloped five strategies: (1) community-tailored handouts and posters, (2) videos featuring local youth, (3) family-centered language to offer vaccines in the primary care clinic, (4) communication-skills training for primary care providers, and (5) use of community health workers to counsel families about the vaccine. The majority (56-96.9%) of youth and caregivers rated each of these strategies as acceptable, especially because they addressed common concerns and facilitated shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engaging community and family partners led to the co-development of culturally- and locally-tailored strategies to promote dialogue and shared decision-making about the COVID-19 vaccine. This process can be used to codevelop interventions to address other forms of public health disparities.</p><p><strong>Policy implications: </strong>Intervention strategies that promote dialogues with trusted healthcare providers and support shared decision-making are acceptable strategies to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake among youth from historically underserved communities. Stakeholder-engaged methods may also help in the development of interventions to address other forms of health disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delaware journal of public health\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"30-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10987021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delaware journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2024.03.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2024.03.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:描述让社区、照顾者和青少年伙伴参与制定干预措施的过程,以促进非西班牙裔黑人(Black)和西班牙裔青少年公平接种 COVID-19 疫苗,这些青少年的 COVID-19 传播率、发病率和死亡率较高,但接种 COVID-19 疫苗的可能性较低:我们组建了一个由 11 名黑人和西班牙裔社区合作伙伴组成的团队,与我们的跨学科研究团队共同制定干预策略。我们采用混合方法众包的方式,从初级保健诊所招募了尚未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的黑人和拉美裔青少年(15 人)以及黑人和拉美裔青少年的照顾者(20 人),以征求他们对这些干预策略可接受性的看法:我们制定了五种策略:(1)社区定制的传单和海报;(2)以当地青年为主角的视频;(3)以家庭为中心的语言,在初级保健诊所提供疫苗;(4)对初级保健提供者进行沟通技巧培训;(5)利用社区卫生工作者为家庭提供疫苗咨询。大多数(56-96.9%)青少年和照顾者认为这些策略都是可以接受的,尤其是因为它们解决了共同关心的问题并促进了共同决策:通过社区和家庭合作伙伴的参与,共同制定了适合当地文化的策略,以促进有关 COVID-19 疫苗的对话和共同决策。这一过程可用于制定干预措施,以解决其他形式的公共卫生差异:政策含义:促进与可信赖的医疗保健提供者对话并支持共同决策的干预策略是可接受的策略,可促进来自历史上服务不足社区的青少年接种 COVID-19 疫苗。利益相关者参与的方法也有助于制定干预措施,以解决其他形式的健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community Partnership to Co-Develop an Intervention to Promote Equitable Uptake of the COVID-19 Vaccine Among Pediatric Populations.

Objective: To describe the process of engaging community, caregiver, and youth partners in codeveloping an intervention to promote equitable uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine in non-Hispanic Black (Black) and Hispanic youth who experience higher rates of COVID-19 transmission, morbidity, and mortality but were less likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

Methods: A team of 11 Black and Hispanic community partners was assembled to codevelop intervention strategies with our interdisciplinary research team. We used a mixed-methods crowdsourcing approach with Black and Hispanic youth (n=15) and caregivers of Black and Hispanic youth (n=20) who had not yet been vaccinated against COVID-19, recruited from primary care clinics, to elicit perspectives on the acceptability of these intervention strategies.

Results: We codeveloped five strategies: (1) community-tailored handouts and posters, (2) videos featuring local youth, (3) family-centered language to offer vaccines in the primary care clinic, (4) communication-skills training for primary care providers, and (5) use of community health workers to counsel families about the vaccine. The majority (56-96.9%) of youth and caregivers rated each of these strategies as acceptable, especially because they addressed common concerns and facilitated shared decision-making.

Conclusions: Engaging community and family partners led to the co-development of culturally- and locally-tailored strategies to promote dialogue and shared decision-making about the COVID-19 vaccine. This process can be used to codevelop interventions to address other forms of public health disparities.

Policy implications: Intervention strategies that promote dialogues with trusted healthcare providers and support shared decision-making are acceptable strategies to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake among youth from historically underserved communities. Stakeholder-engaged methods may also help in the development of interventions to address other forms of health disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investing in Delaware's Early Care and Education to Improve Public Health. Delaware Ranks 45th Nationally in Education Outcomes: Measuring Academic Success and Improving Educational Outcomes for Delaware's Youth. Delaware's Progress and Potential in Early Childhood. Early Brain Development and Public Health. Early Education is the Civil Rights and Public Health Issue of the Century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1