COVID-19导致的急性呼吸衰竭患者首次俯卧位操作的持续时间及其与90天死亡率的关系:时间分层回顾性研究。

{"title":"COVID-19导致的急性呼吸衰竭患者首次俯卧位操作的持续时间及其与90天死亡率的关系:时间分层回顾性研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the association between the duration of the first prone positioning maneuver (PPM) and 90-day mortality in patients with C-ARDS.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, observational, and analytical study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>COVID-19 ICU of a tertiary hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adults over 18 years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 disease requiring PPM.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Multivariable analysis of 90-day survival.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Duration of the first PPM, number of PPM sessions, 90-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>271 patients undergoing PPM were analyzed: first tertile (<em>n</em> = 111), second tertile (<em>n</em> = 95) and third tertile (<em>n</em> = 65). The results indicated that the median duration of PDP was 14 h (95% CI: 10−16 h) in the first tertile, 19 h (95% CI: 18−20 h) in the second tertile and 22 h (95% CI: 21−24 h) in the third tertile. Comparison of survival curves using the Logrank test did not reach statistical significance (<em>p</em> = 0.11). Cox Regression analysis showed an association between the number of pronation sessions (patients receiving between 2 and 5 sessions (HR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.07–4.49); and those receiving more than 5 sessions (HR = 6.05; 95% CI: 2.78–13.16) and 90-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>while the duration of PDP does not appear to significantly influence 90-day mortality, the number of pronation sessions is identified as a significant factor associated with an increased risk of mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"48 8","pages":"Pages 457-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duration of the first prone positioning maneuver and its association with 90-day mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: A retrospective study of time terciles\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2024.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the association between the duration of the first prone positioning maneuver (PPM) and 90-day mortality in patients with C-ARDS.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, observational, and analytical study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>COVID-19 ICU of a tertiary hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adults over 18 years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 disease requiring PPM.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Multivariable analysis of 90-day survival.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Duration of the first PPM, number of PPM sessions, 90-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>271 patients undergoing PPM were analyzed: first tertile (<em>n</em> = 111), second tertile (<em>n</em> = 95) and third tertile (<em>n</em> = 65). The results indicated that the median duration of PDP was 14 h (95% CI: 10−16 h) in the first tertile, 19 h (95% CI: 18−20 h) in the second tertile and 22 h (95% CI: 21−24 h) in the third tertile. Comparison of survival curves using the Logrank test did not reach statistical significance (<em>p</em> = 0.11). Cox Regression analysis showed an association between the number of pronation sessions (patients receiving between 2 and 5 sessions (HR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.07–4.49); and those receiving more than 5 sessions (HR = 6.05; 95% CI: 2.78–13.16) and 90-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>while the duration of PDP does not appear to significantly influence 90-day mortality, the number of pronation sessions is identified as a significant factor associated with an increased risk of mortality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\"48 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 457-466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724000870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724000870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究C-ARDS患者首次俯卧位操作(PPM)持续时间与90天死亡率之间的关系:设计:回顾性、观察性和分析性研究:地点:一家三甲医院的COVID-19重症监护室:患者:18岁以上确诊患有SARS-CoV-2疾病并需要进行PPM治疗的成年人:90天存活率的多变量分析:结果:对271名接受PPM的患者进行了分析:第一梯队(111人)、第二梯队(95人)和第三梯队(65人)。结果显示,PDP持续时间的中位数在第一梯度为14小时(95% CI:10-16小时),第二梯度为19小时(95% CI:18-20小时),第三梯度为22小时(95% CI:21-24小时)。使用 Logrank 检验比较生存曲线没有统计学意义(P = 0.11)。Cox 回归分析显示,代偿治疗次数(接受 2 到 5 次治疗的患者(HR = 2.19;95% CI:1.07-4.49);接受 5 次以上治疗的患者(HR = 6.05;95% CI:2.78-13.16))与 90 天死亡率之间存在关联。结论:虽然 PDP 的持续时间似乎不会显著影响 90 天死亡率,但代偿治疗次数被确定为与死亡风险增加相关的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Duration of the first prone positioning maneuver and its association with 90-day mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: A retrospective study of time terciles

Objective

To investigate the association between the duration of the first prone positioning maneuver (PPM) and 90-day mortality in patients with C-ARDS.

Design

Retrospective, observational, and analytical study.

Setting

COVID-19 ICU of a tertiary hospital.

Patients

Adults over 18 years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 disease requiring PPM.

Interventions

Multivariable analysis of 90-day survival.

Main variables of interest

Duration of the first PPM, number of PPM sessions, 90-day mortality.

Results

271 patients undergoing PPM were analyzed: first tertile (n = 111), second tertile (n = 95) and third tertile (n = 65). The results indicated that the median duration of PDP was 14 h (95% CI: 10−16 h) in the first tertile, 19 h (95% CI: 18−20 h) in the second tertile and 22 h (95% CI: 21−24 h) in the third tertile. Comparison of survival curves using the Logrank test did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11). Cox Regression analysis showed an association between the number of pronation sessions (patients receiving between 2 and 5 sessions (HR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.07–4.49); and those receiving more than 5 sessions (HR = 6.05; 95% CI: 2.78–13.16) and 90-day mortality.

Conclusions

while the duration of PDP does not appear to significantly influence 90-day mortality, the number of pronation sessions is identified as a significant factor associated with an increased risk of mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation and concordance of HACOR and IROX scales in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received non-invasive ventilation in two intensive care units. From geometric equations to dynamic strategies: advances in the personalization of mechanical ventilation through mechanical power. High flow in tracheostomized patients on their first attempt to wean from mechanical ventilation: More questions on the table. Shocked and moved. Early mobilisation in cardiogenic shock. Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1