{"title":"爱尔兰肩部创伤系列的现行标准--全国性审计。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives/aims</h3><p>The primary aim of this study was to assess the current standard of shoulder radiographs in Ireland. The secondary aim of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons in Ireland are of the opinion that a national protocol is required, and what this protocol should consist of.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national audit of shoulder trauma series x-rays performed in emergency departments was conducted. The number and type of views performed was recorded. The anteroposterior (AP) and axillary or Velpeau views were assessed to determine if they met pre-defined audit criteria. Consultant orthopaedic surgeons working in public trauma hospitals were invited to participate in an online survey by email.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of shoulder trauma series included in this audit was 789. The majority of patients had two views performed (75.92%, n = 599) and 21.17% (n = 167) had an axillary or Velpeau view. The AP view met the audit criteria in 23.09% (n = 181) of cases. The survey response rate was 70.8% (n = 17). 88.2% (n = 15) of surgeons agreed that three views should be performed for a shoulder trauma series and 94.12% (n = 16) agreed that an axillary or Velpeau view should be included. The majority of surgeons surveyed (94%, n = 16) are in favour of establishing a national protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The current standard shoulder trauma series in Irish hospitals consists of two views, most frequently a thoracic AP and a scapular Y view. We propose the introduction of a national protocol consisting of three views: Grashey AP, Scapular Y, and an axillary or Velpeau view.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages e159-e163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current standard of the shoulder trauma series in Ireland – A national audit\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives/aims</h3><p>The primary aim of this study was to assess the current standard of shoulder radiographs in Ireland. The secondary aim of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons in Ireland are of the opinion that a national protocol is required, and what this protocol should consist of.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national audit of shoulder trauma series x-rays performed in emergency departments was conducted. The number and type of views performed was recorded. The anteroposterior (AP) and axillary or Velpeau views were assessed to determine if they met pre-defined audit criteria. Consultant orthopaedic surgeons working in public trauma hospitals were invited to participate in an online survey by email.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of shoulder trauma series included in this audit was 789. The majority of patients had two views performed (75.92%, n = 599) and 21.17% (n = 167) had an axillary or Velpeau view. The AP view met the audit criteria in 23.09% (n = 181) of cases. The survey response rate was 70.8% (n = 17). 88.2% (n = 15) of surgeons agreed that three views should be performed for a shoulder trauma series and 94.12% (n = 16) agreed that an axillary or Velpeau view should be included. The majority of surgeons surveyed (94%, n = 16) are in favour of establishing a national protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The current standard shoulder trauma series in Irish hospitals consists of two views, most frequently a thoracic AP and a scapular Y view. We propose the introduction of a national protocol consisting of three views: Grashey AP, Scapular Y, and an axillary or Velpeau view.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages e159-e163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000416\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的/宗旨:本研究的主要目的是评估爱尔兰目前的肩部放射摄影标准。研究的次要目的是确定爱尔兰的骨科医生是否认为需要制定一项全国性协议,以及该协议应包括哪些内容:方法:对急诊科进行的肩部创伤系列 X 光片进行全国性审核。方法:对急诊科进行的肩部外伤系列 X 光片进行了一次全国性审计,记录了所做切面的数量和类型。对前正位(AP)切面、腋窝切面或维尔普切面进行评估,以确定其是否符合预先设定的审核标准。通过电子邮件邀请在公立创伤医院工作的骨科顾问外科医生参与在线调查:结果:本次审核共纳入 789 例肩部创伤病例。大多数患者都进行了两种视图检查(75.92%,n = 599),21.17%的患者(n = 167)进行了腋窝或Velpeau视图检查。有 23.09% 的病例(n = 181)的 AP 切面符合审计标准。调查回复率为 70.8%(n = 17)。88.2%(n = 15)的外科医生同意在肩部创伤系列手术中应进行三视图检查,94.12%(n = 16)的外科医生同意应包括腋窝或Velpeau视图。接受调查的大多数外科医生(94%,n = 16)都赞成制定一项国家协议:结论:爱尔兰医院目前的标准肩部创伤系列包括两个切面,最常见的是胸AP切面和肩胛Y切面。我们建议采用由三个切面组成的全国性方案:Grashey AP 切面、肩胛 Y 切面和腋窝或 Velpeau 切面。
The current standard of the shoulder trauma series in Ireland – A national audit
Objectives/aims
The primary aim of this study was to assess the current standard of shoulder radiographs in Ireland. The secondary aim of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons in Ireland are of the opinion that a national protocol is required, and what this protocol should consist of.
Methods
A national audit of shoulder trauma series x-rays performed in emergency departments was conducted. The number and type of views performed was recorded. The anteroposterior (AP) and axillary or Velpeau views were assessed to determine if they met pre-defined audit criteria. Consultant orthopaedic surgeons working in public trauma hospitals were invited to participate in an online survey by email.
Results
The number of shoulder trauma series included in this audit was 789. The majority of patients had two views performed (75.92%, n = 599) and 21.17% (n = 167) had an axillary or Velpeau view. The AP view met the audit criteria in 23.09% (n = 181) of cases. The survey response rate was 70.8% (n = 17). 88.2% (n = 15) of surgeons agreed that three views should be performed for a shoulder trauma series and 94.12% (n = 16) agreed that an axillary or Velpeau view should be included. The majority of surgeons surveyed (94%, n = 16) are in favour of establishing a national protocol.
Conclusion
The current standard shoulder trauma series in Irish hospitals consists of two views, most frequently a thoracic AP and a scapular Y view. We propose the introduction of a national protocol consisting of three views: Grashey AP, Scapular Y, and an axillary or Velpeau view.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.