{"title":"[根据 \"计划--实施--检查--行动 \"周期促进和评估 \"Kayoi-no-ba \"倡议的框架:ACT-RECIPE 框架]。","authors":"Satoshi Seino, Yu Nofuji, Takuya Ueda, Yuta Nemoto, Masataka Kuraoka, Junta Takahashi, Hiroki Mori, Toshiki Hata, Akihiko Kitamura, Erika Kobayashi, Hiroshi Murayama, Keiko Motokawa, Shinji Hattori, Minoru Yamada, Katsunori Kondo, Hidenori Arai, Yoshinori Fujiwara","doi":"10.11236/jph.23-093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective In 2019, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare emphasized the importance of promoting \"Kayoi-no-ba\" (or \"places to go\") initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycle. However, it proposed no specific promotion measures or standardized evaluation frameworks. This study is intended to propose a framework for local government officials to promote and evaluate \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle.Methods The working group (WG) conducted a narrative review of research and extracted evaluation models and indicators that could be used to create the framework. The co-researcher review committee discussed a draft framework prepared by the WG, and the WG revised it based on the discussion; this process was repeated four times. Using the completed framework, we calculated the score of the \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and conducted regional correlation analyses on the relationship between the score of the \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and the number of \"Kayoi-no-ba\" per 1,000 older persons.Results The completed framework (named \"ACT-RECIPE\" by rearranging the underlined characters below) comprised the following six evaluation phases: (1) Comprehension: understanding the key lessons around disability and frailty prevention, and the necessity for \"Kayoi-no-ba\"; (2) Research and Planning: clarifying the current status of \"Kayoi-no-ba,\" the strengths of the community, and the issues to be addressed through a community assessment, and developing a plan to resolve the issues; (3) Team Building and Collaboration: building a team by collaborating with organizations to solve problems; (4) Implementation: implementing the initiatives necessary to solve problems; (5) Evaluation: verifying changes in output and outcome indicators from the initiatives; and (6) Adjustment and Improvement: re-examining plans, teams, content, and goals based on the evaluation results. In these six phases, we designated 10 core items and accompanying subitems. The median score rate of the ACT-RECIPE framework in 50 municipalities was 75% for \"Comprehension,\" 61% for \"Research and Planning,\" 69% for \"Team Building and Collaboration,\" 64% for \"Implementation,\" 31% for \"Evaluation,\" and 56% for \"Adjustment and Improvement,\" and the mean ACT-RECIPE score rate was 57%. A significant positive correlation (r<sub>s</sub>=0.43, P=0.002) was observed between the ACT-RECIPE mean score rate and the number of \"Kayoi-no-ba\" per 1,000 older persons.Conclusion We proposed the ACT-RECIPE as a framework for promoting and evaluating \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle. We hope that this framework will lead to further progress in \"Kayoi-no-ba\" initiatives and facilitate evaluation of their effectiveness according to the PDCA cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"418-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A framework for promoting and evaluating \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action cycle: The ACT-RECIPE framework].\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Seino, Yu Nofuji, Takuya Ueda, Yuta Nemoto, Masataka Kuraoka, Junta Takahashi, Hiroki Mori, Toshiki Hata, Akihiko Kitamura, Erika Kobayashi, Hiroshi Murayama, Keiko Motokawa, Shinji Hattori, Minoru Yamada, Katsunori Kondo, Hidenori Arai, Yoshinori Fujiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.11236/jph.23-093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective In 2019, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare emphasized the importance of promoting \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" (or \\\"places to go\\\") initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycle. However, it proposed no specific promotion measures or standardized evaluation frameworks. This study is intended to propose a framework for local government officials to promote and evaluate \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle.Methods The working group (WG) conducted a narrative review of research and extracted evaluation models and indicators that could be used to create the framework. The co-researcher review committee discussed a draft framework prepared by the WG, and the WG revised it based on the discussion; this process was repeated four times. Using the completed framework, we calculated the score of the \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and conducted regional correlation analyses on the relationship between the score of the \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and the number of \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" per 1,000 older persons.Results The completed framework (named \\\"ACT-RECIPE\\\" by rearranging the underlined characters below) comprised the following six evaluation phases: (1) Comprehension: understanding the key lessons around disability and frailty prevention, and the necessity for \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\"; (2) Research and Planning: clarifying the current status of \\\"Kayoi-no-ba,\\\" the strengths of the community, and the issues to be addressed through a community assessment, and developing a plan to resolve the issues; (3) Team Building and Collaboration: building a team by collaborating with organizations to solve problems; (4) Implementation: implementing the initiatives necessary to solve problems; (5) Evaluation: verifying changes in output and outcome indicators from the initiatives; and (6) Adjustment and Improvement: re-examining plans, teams, content, and goals based on the evaluation results. In these six phases, we designated 10 core items and accompanying subitems. The median score rate of the ACT-RECIPE framework in 50 municipalities was 75% for \\\"Comprehension,\\\" 61% for \\\"Research and Planning,\\\" 69% for \\\"Team Building and Collaboration,\\\" 64% for \\\"Implementation,\\\" 31% for \\\"Evaluation,\\\" and 56% for \\\"Adjustment and Improvement,\\\" and the mean ACT-RECIPE score rate was 57%. A significant positive correlation (r<sub>s</sub>=0.43, P=0.002) was observed between the ACT-RECIPE mean score rate and the number of \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" per 1,000 older persons.Conclusion We proposed the ACT-RECIPE as a framework for promoting and evaluating \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle. We hope that this framework will lead to further progress in \\\"Kayoi-no-ba\\\" initiatives and facilitate evaluation of their effectiveness according to the PDCA cycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"418-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.23-093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.23-093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[A framework for promoting and evaluating "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action cycle: The ACT-RECIPE framework].
Objective In 2019, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare emphasized the importance of promoting "Kayoi-no-ba" (or "places to go") initiatives according to the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycle. However, it proposed no specific promotion measures or standardized evaluation frameworks. This study is intended to propose a framework for local government officials to promote and evaluate "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle.Methods The working group (WG) conducted a narrative review of research and extracted evaluation models and indicators that could be used to create the framework. The co-researcher review committee discussed a draft framework prepared by the WG, and the WG revised it based on the discussion; this process was repeated four times. Using the completed framework, we calculated the score of the "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and conducted regional correlation analyses on the relationship between the score of the "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives in 50 Tokyo municipalities and the number of "Kayoi-no-ba" per 1,000 older persons.Results The completed framework (named "ACT-RECIPE" by rearranging the underlined characters below) comprised the following six evaluation phases: (1) Comprehension: understanding the key lessons around disability and frailty prevention, and the necessity for "Kayoi-no-ba"; (2) Research and Planning: clarifying the current status of "Kayoi-no-ba," the strengths of the community, and the issues to be addressed through a community assessment, and developing a plan to resolve the issues; (3) Team Building and Collaboration: building a team by collaborating with organizations to solve problems; (4) Implementation: implementing the initiatives necessary to solve problems; (5) Evaluation: verifying changes in output and outcome indicators from the initiatives; and (6) Adjustment and Improvement: re-examining plans, teams, content, and goals based on the evaluation results. In these six phases, we designated 10 core items and accompanying subitems. The median score rate of the ACT-RECIPE framework in 50 municipalities was 75% for "Comprehension," 61% for "Research and Planning," 69% for "Team Building and Collaboration," 64% for "Implementation," 31% for "Evaluation," and 56% for "Adjustment and Improvement," and the mean ACT-RECIPE score rate was 57%. A significant positive correlation (rs=0.43, P=0.002) was observed between the ACT-RECIPE mean score rate and the number of "Kayoi-no-ba" per 1,000 older persons.Conclusion We proposed the ACT-RECIPE as a framework for promoting and evaluating "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives according to the PDCA cycle. We hope that this framework will lead to further progress in "Kayoi-no-ba" initiatives and facilitate evaluation of their effectiveness according to the PDCA cycle.