利用新颖的联合学习框架评估肾移植失败中与护理场所相关的种族差异。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae075
Jiayi Tong, Yishan Shen, Alice Xu, Xing He, Chongliang Luo, Mackenzie Edmondson, Dazheng Zhang, Yiwen Lu, Chao Yan, Ruowang Li, Lianne Siegel, Lichao Sun, Elizabeth A Shenkman, Sally C Morton, Bradley A Malin, Jiang Bian, David A Asch, Yong Chen
{"title":"利用新颖的联合学习框架评估肾移植失败中与护理场所相关的种族差异。","authors":"Jiayi Tong, Yishan Shen, Alice Xu, Xing He, Chongliang Luo, Mackenzie Edmondson, Dazheng Zhang, Yiwen Lu, Chao Yan, Ruowang Li, Lianne Siegel, Lichao Sun, Elizabeth A Shenkman, Sally C Morton, Bradley A Malin, Jiang Bian, David A Asch, Yong Chen","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Racial disparities in kidney transplant access and posttransplant outcomes exist between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients in the United States, with the site of care being a key contributor. Using multi-site data to examine the effect of site of care on racial disparities, the key challenge is the dilemma in sharing patient-level data due to regulations for protecting patients' privacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We developed a federated learning framework, named dGEM-disparity (decentralized algorithm for Generalized linear mixed Effect Model for disparity quantification). Consisting of 2 modules, dGEM-disparity first provides accurately estimated common effects and calibrated hospital-specific effects by requiring only aggregated data from each center and then adopts a counterfactual modeling approach to assess whether the graft failure rates differ if NHB patients had been admitted at transplant centers in the same distribution as NHW patients were admitted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing United States Renal Data System data from 39 043 adult patients across 73 transplant centers over 10 years, we found that if NHB patients had followed the distribution of NHW patients in admissions, there would be 38 fewer deaths or graft failures per 10 000 NHB patients (95% CI, 35-40) within 1 year of receiving a kidney transplant on average.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed framework facilitates efficient collaborations in clinical research networks. Additionally, the framework, by using counterfactual modeling to calculate the event rate, allows us to investigate contributions to racial disparities that may occur at the level of site of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our framework is broadly applicable to other decentralized datasets and disparities research related to differential access to care. Ultimately, our proposed framework will advance equity in human health by identifying and addressing hospital-level racial disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1303-1312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11105132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating site-of-care-related racial disparities in kidney graft failure using a novel federated learning framework.\",\"authors\":\"Jiayi Tong, Yishan Shen, Alice Xu, Xing He, Chongliang Luo, Mackenzie Edmondson, Dazheng Zhang, Yiwen Lu, Chao Yan, Ruowang Li, Lianne Siegel, Lichao Sun, Elizabeth A Shenkman, Sally C Morton, Bradley A Malin, Jiang Bian, David A Asch, Yong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocae075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Racial disparities in kidney transplant access and posttransplant outcomes exist between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients in the United States, with the site of care being a key contributor. Using multi-site data to examine the effect of site of care on racial disparities, the key challenge is the dilemma in sharing patient-level data due to regulations for protecting patients' privacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We developed a federated learning framework, named dGEM-disparity (decentralized algorithm for Generalized linear mixed Effect Model for disparity quantification). Consisting of 2 modules, dGEM-disparity first provides accurately estimated common effects and calibrated hospital-specific effects by requiring only aggregated data from each center and then adopts a counterfactual modeling approach to assess whether the graft failure rates differ if NHB patients had been admitted at transplant centers in the same distribution as NHW patients were admitted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing United States Renal Data System data from 39 043 adult patients across 73 transplant centers over 10 years, we found that if NHB patients had followed the distribution of NHW patients in admissions, there would be 38 fewer deaths or graft failures per 10 000 NHB patients (95% CI, 35-40) within 1 year of receiving a kidney transplant on average.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed framework facilitates efficient collaborations in clinical research networks. Additionally, the framework, by using counterfactual modeling to calculate the event rate, allows us to investigate contributions to racial disparities that may occur at the level of site of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our framework is broadly applicable to other decentralized datasets and disparities research related to differential access to care. Ultimately, our proposed framework will advance equity in human health by identifying and addressing hospital-level racial disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1303-1312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11105132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在美国,非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)和非西班牙裔白人(NHW)患者在肾移植机会和移植后结果方面存在种族差异,其中医疗机构是一个关键因素。利用多地点数据来研究医疗地点对种族差异的影响,面临的主要挑战是由于保护患者隐私的规定而难以共享患者层面的数据:我们开发了一个联合学习框架,命名为 dGEM-disparity(用于差异量化的广义线性混合效应模型的分散算法)。dGEM-disparity由两个模块组成,首先,它只需要每个中心的汇总数据,就能提供精确估算的共同效应和校准的医院特异效应;然后,它采用反事实建模方法,评估如果移植中心接收的NHB患者与接收的NHW患者分布相同,移植失败率是否会有所不同:利用美国肾脏数据系统(United States Renal Data System)10年来在73个移植中心收治的39043名成年患者的数据,我们发现如果NHB患者按照NHW患者的入院分布情况入院,那么平均每1万名NHB患者在接受肾移植后1年内的死亡或移植失败率将减少38例(95% CI,35-40例):所提出的框架有助于临床研究网络的高效合作。此外,该框架通过使用反事实建模来计算事件发生率,使我们能够调查可能发生在医疗机构层面的种族差异:我们的框架广泛适用于其他分散数据集和与不同医疗途径相关的差异研究。最终,我们提出的框架将通过识别和解决医院层面的种族差异来促进人类健康的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating site-of-care-related racial disparities in kidney graft failure using a novel federated learning framework.

Objectives: Racial disparities in kidney transplant access and posttransplant outcomes exist between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients in the United States, with the site of care being a key contributor. Using multi-site data to examine the effect of site of care on racial disparities, the key challenge is the dilemma in sharing patient-level data due to regulations for protecting patients' privacy.

Materials and methods: We developed a federated learning framework, named dGEM-disparity (decentralized algorithm for Generalized linear mixed Effect Model for disparity quantification). Consisting of 2 modules, dGEM-disparity first provides accurately estimated common effects and calibrated hospital-specific effects by requiring only aggregated data from each center and then adopts a counterfactual modeling approach to assess whether the graft failure rates differ if NHB patients had been admitted at transplant centers in the same distribution as NHW patients were admitted.

Results: Utilizing United States Renal Data System data from 39 043 adult patients across 73 transplant centers over 10 years, we found that if NHB patients had followed the distribution of NHW patients in admissions, there would be 38 fewer deaths or graft failures per 10 000 NHB patients (95% CI, 35-40) within 1 year of receiving a kidney transplant on average.

Discussion: The proposed framework facilitates efficient collaborations in clinical research networks. Additionally, the framework, by using counterfactual modeling to calculate the event rate, allows us to investigate contributions to racial disparities that may occur at the level of site of care.

Conclusions: Our framework is broadly applicable to other decentralized datasets and disparities research related to differential access to care. Ultimately, our proposed framework will advance equity in human health by identifying and addressing hospital-level racial disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Layne et al.'s Letter to the Editor. Principles and implementation strategies for equitable and representative academic partnerships in global health informatics research. Digital health equity frameworks and key concepts: a scoping review. Public health informatics specialists in state and local public health workforce: insights from public health workforce interests and needs survey. Alert design in the real world: a cross-sectional analysis of interruptive alerting at 9 academic pediatric health systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1