利用症状和临床变量的机器学习模型预测冠状动脉造影检查中的冠状动脉疾病。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.5114/aic.2024.136416
Yangjie Yu, Weikai Li, Jiajia Wu, Xuyun Hua, Bo Jin, Haiming Shi, Qiying Chen, Junjie Pan
{"title":"利用症状和临床变量的机器学习模型预测冠状动脉造影检查中的冠状动脉疾病。","authors":"Yangjie Yu, Weikai Li, Jiajia Wu, Xuyun Hua, Bo Jin, Haiming Shi, Qiying Chen, Junjie Pan","doi":"10.5114/aic.2024.136416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary angiography (CAG) is invasive and expensive, while numbers of patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CAG results have no coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop machine learning algorithms using symptoms and clinical variables to predict CAD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was conducted as a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing CAG. We randomly chose 2082 patients from 2602 patients suspected of CAD as the training set, and 520 patients as the test set. We utilized LASSO regression to do feature selection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix of different thresholds, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were shown. Support vector machine algorithm performances in 10 folds were conducted in the training set for detecting severe CAD, while XGBoost algorithm performances were conducted in the test set for detecting severe CAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm of logistic regression achieved an average AUC of 0.77 in the training set during 10-fold validation and an AUC of 0.75 in the test set. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.1, 11 patients in the test set (520 patients) were screened out, and NPV reached 90.9%. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.2, 110 patients in the test set were screened out, and reached 83.6%. Meanwhile, when threshold was set to 0.9, PPV reached 97.4%. When the threshold was set to 0.8, PPV reached 91.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning algorithm using data from hospital information systems could assist in severe CAD exclusion and confirmation, and thus help patients avoid unnecessary CAG.</p>","PeriodicalId":49678,"journal":{"name":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","volume":"20 1","pages":"30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning models using symptoms and clinical variables to predict coronary artery disease on coronary angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Yangjie Yu, Weikai Li, Jiajia Wu, Xuyun Hua, Bo Jin, Haiming Shi, Qiying Chen, Junjie Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/aic.2024.136416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary angiography (CAG) is invasive and expensive, while numbers of patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CAG results have no coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop machine learning algorithms using symptoms and clinical variables to predict CAD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was conducted as a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing CAG. We randomly chose 2082 patients from 2602 patients suspected of CAD as the training set, and 520 patients as the test set. We utilized LASSO regression to do feature selection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix of different thresholds, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were shown. Support vector machine algorithm performances in 10 folds were conducted in the training set for detecting severe CAD, while XGBoost algorithm performances were conducted in the test set for detecting severe CAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm of logistic regression achieved an average AUC of 0.77 in the training set during 10-fold validation and an AUC of 0.75 in the test set. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.1, 11 patients in the test set (520 patients) were screened out, and NPV reached 90.9%. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.2, 110 patients in the test set were screened out, and reached 83.6%. Meanwhile, when threshold was set to 0.9, PPV reached 97.4%. When the threshold was set to 0.8, PPV reached 91.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning algorithm using data from hospital information systems could assist in severe CAD exclusion and confirmation, and thus help patients avoid unnecessary CAG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"30-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.136416\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.136416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:冠状动脉造影术(CAG)是一种侵入性检查,费用昂贵,而许多疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者在接受CAG检查后并没有发现冠状动脉病变。目的:利用症状和临床变量开发预测CAD的机器学习算法:本研究对接受 CAG 检查的患者进行横断面研究。我们从 2602 名疑似 CAD 患者中随机选择了 2082 名患者作为训练集,520 名患者作为测试集。我们利用 LASSO 回归进行特征选择。结果显示了接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、不同阈值的混淆矩阵、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。支持向量机算法在检测重度 CAD 的训练集中进行了 10 次折叠,而 XGBoost 算法在检测重度 CAD 的测试集中进行了 10 次折叠:在 10 倍验证过程中,逻辑回归算法在训练集中的平均 AUC 为 0.77,在测试集中的平均 AUC 为 0.75。当模型预测的概率小于 0.1 时,测试集(520 名患者)中的 11 名患者被筛除,NPV 达到 90.9%。当模型预测的概率小于 0.2 时,测试集中的 110 名患者被筛除,NPV 达到 83.6%。同时,当阈值设定为 0.9 时,PPV 达到 97.4%。当阈值设为 0.8 时,PPV 达到 91.5%:利用医院信息系统数据的机器学习算法可以帮助排除和确认严重的 CAD,从而帮助患者避免不必要的 CAG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning models using symptoms and clinical variables to predict coronary artery disease on coronary angiography.

Introduction: Coronary angiography (CAG) is invasive and expensive, while numbers of patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CAG results have no coronary lesions.

Aim: To develop machine learning algorithms using symptoms and clinical variables to predict CAD.

Material and methods: This study was conducted as a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing CAG. We randomly chose 2082 patients from 2602 patients suspected of CAD as the training set, and 520 patients as the test set. We utilized LASSO regression to do feature selection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix of different thresholds, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were shown. Support vector machine algorithm performances in 10 folds were conducted in the training set for detecting severe CAD, while XGBoost algorithm performances were conducted in the test set for detecting severe CAD.

Results: The algorithm of logistic regression achieved an average AUC of 0.77 in the training set during 10-fold validation and an AUC of 0.75 in the test set. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.1, 11 patients in the test set (520 patients) were screened out, and NPV reached 90.9%. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.2, 110 patients in the test set were screened out, and reached 83.6%. Meanwhile, when threshold was set to 0.9, PPV reached 97.4%. When the threshold was set to 0.8, PPV reached 91.5%.

Conclusions: Machine learning algorithm using data from hospital information systems could assist in severe CAD exclusion and confirmation, and thus help patients avoid unnecessary CAG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology is indexed in: Index Copernicus, Ministry of Science and Higher Education Index (MNiSW). Advances in Interventional Cardiology is a quarterly aimed at specialists, mainly at cardiologists and cardiosurgeons. Official journal of the Association on Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society.
期刊最新文献
A new and easy parameter to predict the requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation after transaortic valve implantation: aortic knob calcification. A treatment strategy using directional coronary atherectomy for percutaneous coronary intervention in calcified nodules. Cardiac troponin I release after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects is associated with supraventricular arrhythmias on early follow-up. Commentary: A multi-center study of the MicroNET-covered stent in consecutive patients with acute carotid-related stroke: SAFEGUARD-STROKE. Efficacy of oral treprostinil for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1