结膜 Rt-Pcr 在 Sars-Cov-2 中的诊断准确性:系统综述和诊断准确性元分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1080/09273948.2023.2272200
Aurélie Faubert, Rania Bohsina, Eunice You, Mélanie Hébert, May Griffith, Marie-Josée Aubin
{"title":"结膜 Rt-Pcr 在 Sars-Cov-2 中的诊断准确性:系统综述和诊断准确性元分析。","authors":"Aurélie Faubert, Rania Bohsina, Eunice You, Mélanie Hébert, May Griffith, Marie-Josée Aubin","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2023.2272200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the positivity rate of conjunctival realtime polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and EMBASE were queried using medical subject headings terms. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analyses and forest plots were obtained using the RevMan software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After deduplication, appraisal of abstract titles and full-text analysis of 1441 articles, 42 articles with 3351 COVID-19 patients were included in this review. Of these, 412 conjunctival swabs/Schirmer paper strips tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. The pooled sensitivity of the RT-PCR tests across the 24 studies with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients was 10.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only 1 in 10 RT-PCR tests performed on conjunctival swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Although this suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is likely present and detectable in the conjunctiva, this detection method has low diagnostic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Conjunctival Rt-Pcr in Sars-Cov-2: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aurélie Faubert, Rania Bohsina, Eunice You, Mélanie Hébert, May Griffith, Marie-Josée Aubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273948.2023.2272200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the positivity rate of conjunctival realtime polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and EMBASE were queried using medical subject headings terms. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analyses and forest plots were obtained using the RevMan software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After deduplication, appraisal of abstract titles and full-text analysis of 1441 articles, 42 articles with 3351 COVID-19 patients were included in this review. Of these, 412 conjunctival swabs/Schirmer paper strips tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. The pooled sensitivity of the RT-PCR tests across the 24 studies with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients was 10.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only 1 in 10 RT-PCR tests performed on conjunctival swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Although this suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is likely present and detectable in the conjunctiva, this detection method has low diagnostic potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2023.2272200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2023.2272200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究结膜实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的阳性率:设计:系统综述和诊断准确性荟萃分析:方法:使用医学主题词检索 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE。使用RevMan软件进行诊断准确性荟萃分析和森林图分析:结果:在对1441篇文章进行重复数据删除、摘要标题评估和全文分析后,本综述共纳入42篇文章,涉及3351名COVID-19患者。其中,412 份结膜拭子/Schirmer 纸条通过 RT-PCR 检测出 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。在实验室确诊的 24 项 COVID-19 患者研究中,RT-PCR 检测的总灵敏度为 10.3%:结论:对结膜拭子进行的每 10 次 RT-PCR 检测中,只有 1 次对 SARS-CoV-2 呈阳性。尽管这表明结膜中可能存在并可检测到 SARS-CoV-2,但这种检测方法的诊断潜力较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Accuracy of Conjunctival Rt-Pcr in Sars-Cov-2: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: To study the positivity rate of conjunctival realtime polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Design: Systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were queried using medical subject headings terms. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analyses and forest plots were obtained using the RevMan software.

Results: After deduplication, appraisal of abstract titles and full-text analysis of 1441 articles, 42 articles with 3351 COVID-19 patients were included in this review. Of these, 412 conjunctival swabs/Schirmer paper strips tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. The pooled sensitivity of the RT-PCR tests across the 24 studies with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients was 10.3%.

Conclusions: Only 1 in 10 RT-PCR tests performed on conjunctival swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Although this suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is likely present and detectable in the conjunctiva, this detection method has low diagnostic potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
期刊最新文献
Acinetobacter baumannii Endogenous Endophthalmitis Presenting with Iris Nodules. Autoimmune Retinopathy Following COVID-19: A Case Report. Helicobacter pylori and Its Treatment Impact on Immune-Mediated Ocular Diseases. Epidemiology of Intermediate Uveitis. Limited Utility of Keratic Precipitate Morphology as an Indicator of Underlying Diagnosis in Ocular Inflammation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1