Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2601761
Matteo Belletti, Ester Carreño, Dina Baddar, Francesco Pichi
This review offers a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on near-infrared autofluorescence (NIR-AF) in non-infectious uveitis, highlighting its strengths, limitations, and role in diagnosis, monitoring, and understanding disease mechanisms. Unlike blue-light autofluorescence, which mainly detects lipofuscin, NIR-AF visualizes melanin and related compounds in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroid, providing deeper penetration, reduced phototoxicity, and greater comfort. Across entities like Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, MEWDS, punctate inner choroidopathy, APMPPE, and Fuchs' heterochromic iridocyclitis, NIR-AF reveals patterns often invisible on conventional imaging-detecting subclinical lesions, differentiating active from inactive disease, and tracking RPE changes over time. Its persistence in showing hypoautofluorescent or hyperautofluorescent lesions after clinical resolution offers unique insight into residual or subclinical inflammation. The technique complements OCT, fluorescein, and indocyanine green angiography, adding a melanin-specific layer to multimodal imaging. Limitations include a weaker signal compared to BL-AF, susceptibility to media opacities, equipment-dependent variability, and lack of standardized interpretation criteria. While it cannot quantify choroidal melanin loss directly and image acquisition can be challenging, its non-invasive, repeatable nature and diagnostic yield make it a promising tool for longitudinal uveitis care. Further prospective studies, standardization, and AI-driven analysis could expand its clinical impact, potentially cementing NIR-AF as an essential component in uveitis imaging strategies.
{"title":"Near-Infrared Autofluorescence in Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Review.","authors":"Matteo Belletti, Ester Carreño, Dina Baddar, Francesco Pichi","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2601761","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2601761","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review offers a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on near-infrared autofluorescence (NIR-AF) in non-infectious uveitis, highlighting its strengths, limitations, and role in diagnosis, monitoring, and understanding disease mechanisms. Unlike blue-light autofluorescence, which mainly detects lipofuscin, NIR-AF visualizes melanin and related compounds in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroid, providing deeper penetration, reduced phototoxicity, and greater comfort. Across entities like Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, MEWDS, punctate inner choroidopathy, APMPPE, and Fuchs' heterochromic iridocyclitis, NIR-AF reveals patterns often invisible on conventional imaging-detecting subclinical lesions, differentiating active from inactive disease, and tracking RPE changes over time. Its persistence in showing hypoautofluorescent or hyperautofluorescent lesions after clinical resolution offers unique insight into residual or subclinical inflammation. The technique complements OCT, fluorescein, and indocyanine green angiography, adding a melanin-specific layer to multimodal imaging. Limitations include a weaker signal compared to BL-AF, susceptibility to media opacities, equipment-dependent variability, and lack of standardized interpretation criteria. While it cannot quantify choroidal melanin loss directly and image acquisition can be challenging, its non-invasive, repeatable nature and diagnostic yield make it a promising tool for longitudinal uveitis care. Further prospective studies, standardization, and AI-driven analysis could expand its clinical impact, potentially cementing NIR-AF as an essential component in uveitis imaging strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To describe clinical characteristics, patterns, and surgical outcomes in the management of presumed trematode-induced granulomatous intermediate uveitis (PTIGIU).
Methods: Retrospective single-center study in which patients exposed to fresh water canal exposure with PTIGIU were enrolled. Surgery was done after failure of medical treatment in the form of lensectomy and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Post-operative functional and anatomical outcomes were assessed.
Results: 58 eyes of 56 patients were included with mean age of 12.6 ± 3.07 years, 89.3% males. Ciliary body (CB) granulomas were most commonly present inferiorly (41%) and either extend anteriorly to the lens or circumferential along the CB or posteriorly to the retina and were associated with retinal pathologies in 86.2%; the most common of which was tractional retinal detachment (TRD) (60%). According to retinal pathology, eyes were grouped; Group A: 43 eyes, with early disease, having no or localized peripheral retinal detachment (RD) and B: 15 eyes, with advanced cicatricial disease. Inflammation was well controlled 6 months post-surgery in both groups; however, Group A showed better functional (p = 0.003) and anatomical outcomes (p = 0.01). Lens morphology was negatively correlated with retinal pathology (p = 0.036).
Conclusion: PTIGIU is a potentially blinding disease, with earlier surgical intervention showing better anatomical and functional outcomes.
{"title":"Presumed Trematode-Induced Ciliary Body Granuloma; Clinical Patterns and Management.","authors":"Abdussalam Mohsen Abdullatif, Salma Fekry Al-Etr, Rana Hussein Amin, Rawan Hosny","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2597394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2597394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe clinical characteristics, patterns, and surgical outcomes in the management of presumed trematode-induced granulomatous intermediate uveitis (PTIGIU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-center study in which patients exposed to fresh water canal exposure with PTIGIU were enrolled. Surgery was done after failure of medical treatment in the form of lensectomy and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Post-operative functional and anatomical outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 eyes of 56 patients were included with mean age of 12.6 ± 3.07 years, 89.3% males. Ciliary body (CB) granulomas were most commonly present inferiorly (41%) and either extend anteriorly to the lens or circumferential along the CB or posteriorly to the retina and were associated with retinal pathologies in 86.2%; the most common of which was tractional retinal detachment (TRD) (60%). According to retinal pathology, eyes were grouped; Group A: 43 eyes, with early disease, having no or localized peripheral retinal detachment (RD) and B: 15 eyes, with advanced cicatricial disease. Inflammation was well controlled 6 months post-surgery in both groups; however, Group A showed better functional (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and anatomical outcomes (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Lens morphology was negatively correlated with retinal pathology (<i>p</i> = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTIGIU is a potentially blinding disease, with earlier surgical intervention showing better anatomical and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2600577
Marta Sant Albors, Rachid Bouchikh-El Jarroudi, Sandra Gómez Sánchez, Ana Blázquez-Albisu, Sofía España Fernandez, Silvia Presas Rodríguez, Estefanía Cobos Martín, José Luis Manzano Monzo
Purpose: Case report.
Methods: Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is a rareparaneoplastic autoimmune disorder characterized by retinal dysfunction inpatients with cutaneous melanoma. While typically presenting with photopsias, nyctalopia, and peripheral vision loss, diagnosis remains challenging due tooften normal fundoscopic findings and variable autoantibody detection. Thisreport describes a unique case of recurrent MAR managed successfully withintravitreal dexamethasone over a decade-long follow-up.
Results: A 48-year-old man with stage IV cutaneousmelanoma with BRAF V600E mutation achieved complete systemic remission with vemurafenib. During ophthalmological screening, he reported nyctalopia andphotopsias; clinical examination and optical coherence tomography wereunremarkable. Full-field electroretinography (ERG) revealed an electronegativewaveform (reduced b-wave), confirming MAR despite negative antiretinalantibodies. Sub-Tenon's triamcinolone and intravenous immunoglobulin failed toimprove symptoms, but bilateral intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex) resolved visual disturbances and normalized ERG. Over ten years, eight MAR recurrences occurred - each treated successfully with Ozurdex - without melanoma relapse.
Conclusion: MAR can be presented as the first sign of melanoma relapse. This case underscores MAR's potential for recurrence despite durable melanoma remission and highlights intravitreal dexamethasone as an effective long-term therapy. The absence of autoantibodies and late flares challenges current diagnostic paradigms, emphasizing ERG's critical role. Proactive ophthalmologic surveillance and individualized local therapy canpreserve vision in this underrecognized condition.
{"title":"Long Term of Follow-Up of Melanoma-Associated Retinopathy: A Case Report.","authors":"Marta Sant Albors, Rachid Bouchikh-El Jarroudi, Sandra Gómez Sánchez, Ana Blázquez-Albisu, Sofía España Fernandez, Silvia Presas Rodríguez, Estefanía Cobos Martín, José Luis Manzano Monzo","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2600577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2600577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Case report.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is a rareparaneoplastic autoimmune disorder characterized by retinal dysfunction inpatients with cutaneous melanoma. While typically presenting with photopsias, nyctalopia, and peripheral vision loss, diagnosis remains challenging due tooften normal fundoscopic findings and variable autoantibody detection. Thisreport describes a unique case of recurrent MAR managed successfully withintravitreal dexamethasone over a decade-long follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 48-year-old man with stage IV cutaneousmelanoma with BRAF V600E mutation achieved complete systemic remission with vemurafenib. During ophthalmological screening, he reported nyctalopia andphotopsias; clinical examination and optical coherence tomography wereunremarkable. Full-field electroretinography (ERG) revealed an electronegativewaveform (reduced b-wave), confirming MAR despite negative antiretinalantibodies. Sub-Tenon's triamcinolone and intravenous immunoglobulin failed toimprove symptoms, but bilateral intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex) resolved visual disturbances and normalized ERG. Over ten years, eight MAR recurrences occurred - each treated successfully with Ozurdex - without melanoma relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MAR can be presented as the first sign of melanoma relapse. This case underscores MAR's potential for recurrence despite durable melanoma remission and highlights intravitreal dexamethasone as an effective long-term therapy. The absence of autoantibodies and late flares challenges current diagnostic paradigms, emphasizing ERG's critical role. Proactive ophthalmologic surveillance and individualized local therapy canpreserve vision in this underrecognized condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145781673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2599370
Jiayi Wang, Zhenyu Zhong, Pei Zhang, Wuhong Weng, Peizeng Yang
Objectives: Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is an immune-mediated, vision-threatening disease often requiring immunomodulatory therapy. We systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory therapies for the management of NIU.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 2024. Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory agents for uveitis were included. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted to compare treatments across trials, while frequentist meta-analyses were performed to estimate the absolute treatment failure rate at month 6 and the overall SAEs rate. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.
Results: Sixteen randomized controlled trials, involving 11 immunomodulatory therapies, were included from 6097 records retrieved. Among them, adalimumab plus corticosteroids was associated with significant reduction in hazard of treatment failure over time (HR 0.51, 95% CrI: 0.24-0.95) compared with corticosteroids monotherapy. The estimated overall treatment failure rate at month 6 was 37.6%, and the number of SAE was around 10.1%. No significant differences were observed in treatment failure rates at month 6, changes in BCVA or number of SAEs across treatments.
Conclusions: Adalimumab plus corticosteroids significantly prolonged the relapse-free period compared with corticosteroids monotherapy. Mycophenolic acid showed favorable trend in both efficacy and safety. Despite immunomodulatory treatment, the risk of uveitis relapse still remains and warrants continued attention.
目的:非感染性葡萄膜炎(NIU)是一种免疫介导的视力威胁疾病,通常需要免疫调节治疗。我们系统地评估了免疫调节疗法治疗牛牛的有效性和安全性。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov的检索截止到2024年12月。随机对照试验(rct)评估免疫调节剂治疗葡萄膜炎的有效性和安全性。贝叶斯网络荟萃分析用于比较不同试验的治疗,而频率荟萃分析用于估计第6个月的绝对治疗失败率和总体SAEs率。使用Cochrane Risk of bias 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。结果:从检索到的6097份记录中纳入16项随机对照试验,涉及11种免疫调节疗法。其中,与单药治疗相比,阿达木单抗加糖皮质激素治疗失败的风险显著降低(HR 0.51, 95% CrI: 0.24-0.95)。估计第6个月的总体治疗失败率为37.6%,SAE数量约为10.1%。在第6个月的治疗失败率、BCVA的变化或不同治疗的SAEs数量方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:与单药治疗相比,阿达木单抗加糖皮质激素可显著延长无复发期。霉酚酸在疗效和安全性方面均表现出良好的趋势。尽管免疫调节治疗,葡萄膜炎复发的风险仍然存在,值得继续关注。
{"title":"Comparative Effects of Immunomodulatory Therapies in Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jiayi Wang, Zhenyu Zhong, Pei Zhang, Wuhong Weng, Peizeng Yang","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2599370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2599370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is an immune-mediated, vision-threatening disease often requiring immunomodulatory therapy. We systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory therapies for the management of NIU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 2024. Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory agents for uveitis were included. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted to compare treatments across trials, while frequentist meta-analyses were performed to estimate the absolute treatment failure rate at month 6 and the overall SAEs rate. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen randomized controlled trials, involving 11 immunomodulatory therapies, were included from 6097 records retrieved. Among them, adalimumab plus corticosteroids was associated with significant reduction in hazard of treatment failure over time (HR 0.51, 95% CrI: 0.24-0.95) compared with corticosteroids monotherapy. The estimated overall treatment failure rate at month 6 was 37.6%, and the number of SAE was around 10.1%. No significant differences were observed in treatment failure rates at month 6, changes in BCVA or number of SAEs across treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adalimumab plus corticosteroids significantly prolonged the relapse-free period compared with corticosteroids monotherapy. Mycophenolic acid showed favorable trend in both efficacy and safety. Despite immunomodulatory treatment, the risk of uveitis relapse still remains and warrants continued attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145781720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2597388
Zhaoquan Wu, Wei Sun, Chunjiang Wang
Purpose: To explore the clinical characteristics of moxifloxacin-associated bilateral acute iris transillumination (BAIT) and provide references for diagnosis and treatment.
Methods: The clinical reports of moxifloxacin-associated BAIT were collected before August 31, 2025, and the clinical data were extracted for retrospective analysis.
Results: A total of 40 patients were included, with a median age of 53 (range 26, 77), including 28 (70.0%) women. The median occurrence time of BAIT was 14 days (rang 0.2, 60). Patients may present with photophobia (75.0%), decreased vision (67.5%), ocular pain (50.0%), and high intraocular pressure (32.5%). Ophthalmic examination shows iris transillumination. After the patients discontinued moxifloxacin and received topical steroids and anti-glaucoma treatment, the symptoms of most patients improved, while transillumination remained.
Conclusions: The patient developed ocular symptoms such as photophobia, ocular pain and decreased vision during the use of moxifloxacin, which requires further examination. If iris transillumination, ocular hypertension and acute pigment dispersion of the iris pigment epithelium are found during ophthalmic examination, the possibility of BAIT should be considered.
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Moxifloxacin-Associated Bilateral Acute Iris Transillumination.","authors":"Zhaoquan Wu, Wei Sun, Chunjiang Wang","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2597388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2597388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the clinical characteristics of moxifloxacin-associated bilateral acute iris transillumination (BAIT) and provide references for diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical reports of moxifloxacin-associated BAIT were collected before August 31, 2025, and the clinical data were extracted for retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients were included, with a median age of 53 (range 26, 77), including 28 (70.0%) women. The median occurrence time of BAIT was 14 days (rang 0.2, 60). Patients may present with photophobia (75.0%), decreased vision (67.5%), ocular pain (50.0%), and high intraocular pressure (32.5%). Ophthalmic examination shows iris transillumination. After the patients discontinued moxifloxacin and received topical steroids and anti-glaucoma treatment, the symptoms of most patients improved, while transillumination remained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient developed ocular symptoms such as photophobia, ocular pain and decreased vision during the use of moxifloxacin, which requires further examination. If iris transillumination, ocular hypertension and acute pigment dispersion of the iris pigment epithelium are found during ophthalmic examination, the possibility of BAIT should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145781725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Fungal endophthalmitis (FE) is a rare but severe intraocular infection that may cause irreversible vision loss. Because conventional cultures are slow and insensitive and serum β-D-glucan (BDG) has limited value for intraocular disease, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of BDG testing in aqueous humor (AH) and vitreous humor (VH) for FE.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies of intraocular BDG testing for FE. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a random-effects model, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and diagnostic odds ratio were used to assess diagnostic performance. Study quality was evaluated with QUADAS-2. An exploratory post hoc subgroup analysis compared AH and VH when specimen-specific data were available.
Results: Six studies were identified and included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of intraocular BDG testing were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.913, indicating good diagnostic accuracy, and no heterogeneity was observed for either sensitivity or specificity (both I² = 0.0%). Methodological quality was moderate, mainly because of patient-selection bias. In an exploratory specimen-type subgroup, study-level estimates ranged as follows: AH sensitivity 0.82-0.86 and specificity 0.80-0.87; VH sensitivity 0.94-1.00 and specificity 0.82-0.96.
Conclusion: Intraocular BDG shows high diagnostic accuracy for FE and may serve as a valuable adjunctive tool, particularly when conventional culture methods are inconclusive or delayed.
目的:真菌性眼内炎(FE)是一种罕见但严重的眼内感染,可导致不可逆的视力丧失。由于常规培养缓慢且不敏感,血清β- d -葡聚糖(BDG)对眼内疾病的诊断价值有限,我们评估了BDG检测在房水(AH)和玻璃体(VH)中诊断FE的准确性。方法:我们检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,查找眼内BDG检测FE的相关研究。使用随机效应模型计算合并敏感性和特异性,并使用总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线下面积和诊断优势比来评估诊断效果。采用QUADAS-2评价研究质量。当样本特异性数据可用时,探索性事后亚组分析比较了AH和VH。结果:确定并纳入了6项研究。眼内BDG检测的敏感性和特异性分别为0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92)和0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90)。SROC曲线下面积为0.913,诊断准确性较好,敏感性和特异性均无异质性(均I²= 0.0%)。方法学质量一般,主要是由于患者选择偏倚。在探索性标本型亚组中,研究水平估计范围如下:AH敏感性0.82-0.86,特异性0.80-0.87;VH敏感性0.94 ~ 1.00,特异性0.82 ~ 0.96。结论:眼内BDG对FE具有较高的诊断准确性,可作为一种有价值的辅助工具,特别是在常规培养方法不确定或延迟的情况下。
{"title":"β-D-glucan in Intraocular Fluids for Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.","authors":"Sayaka Goto, Yuki Mizuki, Nobuyuki Horita, Akira Meguro, Tatsukata Kawagoe, Tsuyoshi Teshigawara, Norihiro Yamada, Nobuhisa Mizuki","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2599369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2599369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fungal endophthalmitis (FE) is a rare but severe intraocular infection that may cause irreversible vision loss. Because conventional cultures are slow and insensitive and serum β-D-glucan (BDG) has limited value for intraocular disease, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of BDG testing in aqueous humor (AH) and vitreous humor (VH) for FE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies of intraocular BDG testing for FE. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a random-effects model, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and diagnostic odds ratio were used to assess diagnostic performance. Study quality was evaluated with QUADAS-2. An exploratory post hoc subgroup analysis compared AH and VH when specimen-specific data were available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were identified and included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of intraocular BDG testing were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.913, indicating good diagnostic accuracy, and no heterogeneity was observed for either sensitivity or specificity (both I² = 0.0%). Methodological quality was moderate, mainly because of patient-selection bias. In an exploratory specimen-type subgroup, study-level estimates ranged as follows: AH sensitivity 0.82-0.86 and specificity 0.80-0.87; VH sensitivity 0.94-1.00 and specificity 0.82-0.96.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraocular BDG shows high diagnostic accuracy for FE and may serve as a valuable adjunctive tool, particularly when conventional culture methods are inconclusive or delayed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2593460
Daniel Adamkiewicz, Sruthi Arepalli, Kubra Sarici, H Ayesha Hossain, Nieraj Jain
Purpose: To investigate trends in the diagnostic approach to nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR).
Methods: We queried PubMed for clinical reports on npAIR published between January 2016 and September 2025. Articles were assessed to determine criteria used to establish diagnosis of npAIR using a standardized grading system. Articles were categorized as case reports (≤3 patients) or case series (>3 patients).
Results: 36 case reports and 41 case series met eligibility criteria (755 total cases). Author subspecialty included 34% uveitis, 20% inherited retinal disease (IRD), 16% general retina, 10% miscellaneous, and 19% unknown specialty. Over 80% of publications reported electroretinography and anti-retinal antibody testing for diagnosis of npAIR. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) was performed in 67% of case reports and at least one patient in 51% of case series. Widefield FAF was used in 19% of case reports and in at least one patient in 20% of case series. Genetic testing was reported in 22% of case reports and in at least one patient in 27% of case series. Studies with an IRD specialist as first or last author most commonly used genetic testing (35%).
Conclusions: Literature on npAIR is hampered by variability in classification schemes and incomplete reporting. Nonspecific electroretinography testing and antiretinal antibody testing are widely employed while widefield autofluorescence testing and genetic testing are not commonly used. Expanded access to these tools provides an opportunity to update diagnostic criteria of npAIR. Improved classification will permit us to better understand the natural history of disease.
{"title":"Nonparaneoplastic Autoimmune Retinopathy: Scoping Review and Suggested Reporting Guidelines.","authors":"Daniel Adamkiewicz, Sruthi Arepalli, Kubra Sarici, H Ayesha Hossain, Nieraj Jain","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2593460","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2593460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate trends in the diagnostic approach to nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried PubMed for clinical reports on npAIR published between January 2016 and September 2025. Articles were assessed to determine criteria used to establish diagnosis of npAIR using a standardized grading system. Articles were categorized as case reports (≤3 patients) or case series (>3 patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 case reports and 41 case series met eligibility criteria (755 total cases). Author subspecialty included 34% uveitis, 20% inherited retinal disease (IRD), 16% general retina, 10% miscellaneous, and 19% unknown specialty. Over 80% of publications reported electroretinography and anti-retinal antibody testing for diagnosis of npAIR. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) was performed in 67% of case reports and at least one patient in 51% of case series. Widefield FAF was used in 19% of case reports and in at least one patient in 20% of case series. Genetic testing was reported in 22% of case reports and in at least one patient in 27% of case series. Studies with an IRD specialist as first or last author most commonly used genetic testing (35%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Literature on npAIR is hampered by variability in classification schemes and incomplete reporting. Nonspecific electroretinography testing and antiretinal antibody testing are widely employed while widefield autofluorescence testing and genetic testing are not commonly used. Expanded access to these tools provides an opportunity to update diagnostic criteria of npAIR. Improved classification will permit us to better understand the natural history of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2594656
Julia Canestraro, Daniel Kowalsky Moskaliuk, David H Abramson, Jasmine H Francis
Purpose: The more widely known ocular toxicity of Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) is keratopathy. Clinical trial data provides little detail on the lesser known toxicity of anterior uveitis from MIRV. We discuss the potential mechanism for this toxicity and provide suggested adjustments to current clinical practice for patients on this drug.
Methods: This retrospective case series, single center study included 42 consecutive patients treated with MIRV at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for High-grade serous ovarian cancer and examined in our ophthalmology department between March 1, 2024 - July 15, 2025.
Results: Seventeen of forty-two (40%) patients (median age of 69 years) developed keratitis, and three (7.1%) patients, developed grade 1+ bilateral non-granulomatous anterior uveitis on treatment with MIRV. Uveitis was diagnosed after a median of 12 cycles (range 9-14).
Conclusion: Although a small cohort, our findings suggest that MIRV-induced anterior uveitis is more common than initially thought. Reassuringly, all cases observed have been mild and reversible with topical steroid drops and most patients were able to continue on MIRV (lifesaving) treatment.
{"title":"Mirvetuximab Soravtansine-gynx Induced Anterior Uveitis: A Case Series.","authors":"Julia Canestraro, Daniel Kowalsky Moskaliuk, David H Abramson, Jasmine H Francis","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2594656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2594656","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The more widely known ocular toxicity of Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) is keratopathy. Clinical trial data provides little detail on the lesser known toxicity of anterior uveitis from MIRV. We discuss the potential mechanism for this toxicity and provide suggested adjustments to current clinical practice for patients on this drug.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case series, single center study included 42 consecutive patients treated with MIRV at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for High-grade serous ovarian cancer and examined in our ophthalmology department between March 1, 2024 - July 15, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen of forty-two (40%) patients (median age of 69 years) developed keratitis, and three (7.1%) patients, developed grade 1+ bilateral non-granulomatous anterior uveitis on treatment with MIRV. Uveitis was diagnosed after a median of 12 cycles (range 9-14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a small cohort, our findings suggest that MIRV-induced anterior uveitis is more common than initially thought. Reassuringly, all cases observed have been mild and reversible with topical steroid drops and most patients were able to continue on MIRV (lifesaving) treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2594660
Emaan Asghar, Jose Cijin Puthussery, Joke de Boer, Virginia Miraldi Utz
Paediatric neoplastic uveitis masquerade syndrome (UMS) is a rare but serious condition in which intraocular malignancies mimic inflammatory uveitis. Children may present with symptoms of intraocular inflammation such as redness, pain, light sensitivity, and blurred vision. The diagnostic challenge is compounded by the difficulty of examining younger patients and the absence of systemic warning signs. Accurate diagnosis is essential because the therapies for uveitis and ocular neoplasms vary fundamentally, and delayed recognition can be life-threatening.Although the most frequent neoplastic masquerades are acute leukaemia and retinoblastoma (RB), medulloepithelioma and metastatic tumours may also occur. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, the most common childhood malignancy, can manifest as anterior pseudohypopyon, iris infiltration or neovascularization, or posterior segment findings, including haemorrhages, Roth spots, and serous retinal detachment. Ocular involvement may indicate relapse. RB, the most common primary intraocular cancer in children, usually presents with leukocoria or strabismus. However, its diffuse infiltrating variant can masquerade as intraocular inflammation with pseudohypopyon, iris neovascularization, vitreous seeds, and vitreous haemorrhage. Unlike classic RB, this variant often lacks a discrete calcified mass, further complicating the diagnosis, which frequently results in misdiagnosis of uveitis.Multimodal ophthalmic imaging, including enhanced depth optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and ultrasonography, may aid in the diagnosis. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, combined with a comprehensive history and laboratory evaluation, can help distinguish neoplastic masquerades from inflammatory diseases. Early recognition, prompt referral to an oncology or ocular oncology department, and multidisciplinary care are critical because a timely diagnosis can preserve both vision and life.
{"title":"Paediatric Neoplastic Uveitis Masquerade Syndromes.","authors":"Emaan Asghar, Jose Cijin Puthussery, Joke de Boer, Virginia Miraldi Utz","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2594660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2594660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paediatric neoplastic uveitis masquerade syndrome (UMS) is a rare but serious condition in which intraocular malignancies mimic inflammatory uveitis. Children may present with symptoms of intraocular inflammation such as redness, pain, light sensitivity, and blurred vision. The diagnostic challenge is compounded by the difficulty of examining younger patients and the absence of systemic warning signs. Accurate diagnosis is essential because the therapies for uveitis and ocular neoplasms vary fundamentally, and delayed recognition can be life-threatening.Although the most frequent neoplastic masquerades are acute leukaemia and retinoblastoma (RB), medulloepithelioma and metastatic tumours may also occur. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, the most common childhood malignancy, can manifest as anterior pseudohypopyon, iris infiltration or neovascularization, or posterior segment findings, including haemorrhages, Roth spots, and serous retinal detachment. Ocular involvement may indicate relapse. RB, the most common primary intraocular cancer in children, usually presents with leukocoria or strabismus. However, its diffuse infiltrating variant can masquerade as intraocular inflammation with pseudohypopyon, iris neovascularization, vitreous seeds, and vitreous haemorrhage. Unlike classic RB, this variant often lacks a discrete calcified mass, further complicating the diagnosis, which frequently results in misdiagnosis of uveitis.Multimodal ophthalmic imaging, including enhanced depth optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and ultrasonography, may aid in the diagnosis. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, combined with a comprehensive history and laboratory evaluation, can help distinguish neoplastic masquerades from inflammatory diseases. Early recognition, prompt referral to an oncology or ocular oncology department, and multidisciplinary care are critical because a timely diagnosis can preserve both vision and life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2025.2600575
Alessandro Marchese, Timothy M Janetos, Anjum F Koreishi, Debra A Goldstein
Introduction: Birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) is a chronic posterior uveitis. In some cases, hyperreflective material between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch's membrane is noted on optical coherence tomography (OCT), the so-called double-layer sign. This study describes the clinical features associated with the double-layer sign on OCT in BSCR.
Methods: In retrospective, observational study of patients with BSCR, charts and OCT images of consecutive patients were reviewed and the presence of the double-layer sign on OCT was noted. Clinical features associated with the double-layer sign were analyzed.
Results: Forty-nine patients with HLA-A29+ BSCR were retrospectively reviewed and 15 eyes (15%) of 9 patients (18%) demonstrated the presence of the double-layer sign on OCT. The presence of CNV corresponding to the double-layer sign on OCT was confirmed in eyes that had additional imaging (11 out of 15 eyes; 73%). Intra- or subretinal exudation was present at some point during follow-up in 5/15 eyes (33%), and 3/15 eyes received treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (20%).
Conclusions: Birdshot chorioretinopathy can develop a double-layer sign on OCT often harboring a non-exudative or minimally active choroidal neovascularization. This sign in patients with BSCR might indicate chronic inflammation involving the posterior pole.
{"title":"Birdshot Chorioretinopathy with Double-Layer Sign and Choroidal Neovascularization: A Single-Centre Analysis.","authors":"Alessandro Marchese, Timothy M Janetos, Anjum F Koreishi, Debra A Goldstein","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2600575","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2600575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) is a chronic posterior uveitis. In some cases, hyperreflective material between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch's membrane is noted on optical coherence tomography (OCT), the so-called double-layer sign. This study describes the clinical features associated with the double-layer sign on OCT in BSCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In retrospective, observational study of patients with BSCR, charts and OCT images of consecutive patients were reviewed and the presence of the double-layer sign on OCT was noted. Clinical features associated with the double-layer sign were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine patients with HLA-A29+ BSCR were retrospectively reviewed and 15 eyes (15%) of 9 patients (18%) demonstrated the presence of the double-layer sign on OCT. The presence of CNV corresponding to the double-layer sign on OCT was confirmed in eyes that had additional imaging (11 out of 15 eyes; 73%). Intra- or subretinal exudation was present at some point during follow-up in 5/15 eyes (33%), and 3/15 eyes received treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (20%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Birdshot chorioretinopathy can develop a double-layer sign on OCT often harboring a non-exudative or minimally active choroidal neovascularization. This sign in patients with BSCR might indicate chronic inflammation involving the posterior pole.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}