尼日利亚西南部拉各斯州和奥苏恩州农村和城郊社区对抗疟药物的偏好和使用情况。

MalariaWorld journal Pub Date : 2017-02-22 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10732924
Monday Tola, Ojo Oreoluwa, Emmanuel T Idowu, Esther O Iyede, Olusesan Omidiji, Taiwo S Awolola
{"title":"尼日利亚西南部拉各斯州和奥苏恩州农村和城郊社区对抗疟药物的偏好和使用情况。","authors":"Monday Tola, Ojo Oreoluwa, Emmanuel T Idowu, Esther O Iyede, Olusesan Omidiji, Taiwo S Awolola","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10732924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicine preference, usage and health-seeking behaviour are very important in the treatment of malaria and prevention and management of drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study, using a semi-structured questionnaire administered to 135 respondents, was carried out to assess antimalarial drug preference and usage among rural dwellers in Alajue, Ede, Osun State and peri-urban dwellers in Ajara, Badagry, Lagos State, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loss of appetite, fever, chill and rigour, headache and vomiting were the most frequently reported symptoms (83.3%, 78.6%, 71.4%, 69.0% and 64.3%, respectively). More than half (57.1%) of the respondents had their drugs prescribed by a qualified health practitioner. Sixty-eight (50.3%) respondents treated malaria with Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) while Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP), paracetamol and herbal medicine usage was reported by 11.9%, 9.6% and 4.4% of the respondents, respectively. Thirty-two respondents (23.7%) took nothing to treat the infection. Of them, only 64.3% completed their drugs regimen during their last episode with 35.7% reporting that fever subsided on/before day 2 of treatment and 64.3% reported that fever subsided two days post treatment. The majority (83.3%) of respondents had no adverse reaction to the drugs used (16.7% reported drowsiness, nausea, headaches and vomiting) with 64% of the respondents reporting that they will use ACT again anytime they have malaria and about 65% reported that the drug was very convenient for them (χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.192, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The control of drug resistance in malaria parasites requires reducing the overall drug pressure, improving the ways the drugs are used and prescribing follow-up practices. The use of drug combinations that are not likely to foster resistance like ACT is also a good measure of resistance control. ACT would be expected to remain the key anti-malarial drug for treatment of multidrug resistance <i>P. falciparum</i> since there are no alternative drugs available at present.</p>","PeriodicalId":74100,"journal":{"name":"MalariaWorld journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimalarial medicine preference and usage in rural and peri-urban communities in Lagos and Osun states in southwestern Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Monday Tola, Ojo Oreoluwa, Emmanuel T Idowu, Esther O Iyede, Olusesan Omidiji, Taiwo S Awolola\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.10732924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicine preference, usage and health-seeking behaviour are very important in the treatment of malaria and prevention and management of drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study, using a semi-structured questionnaire administered to 135 respondents, was carried out to assess antimalarial drug preference and usage among rural dwellers in Alajue, Ede, Osun State and peri-urban dwellers in Ajara, Badagry, Lagos State, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loss of appetite, fever, chill and rigour, headache and vomiting were the most frequently reported symptoms (83.3%, 78.6%, 71.4%, 69.0% and 64.3%, respectively). More than half (57.1%) of the respondents had their drugs prescribed by a qualified health practitioner. Sixty-eight (50.3%) respondents treated malaria with Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) while Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP), paracetamol and herbal medicine usage was reported by 11.9%, 9.6% and 4.4% of the respondents, respectively. Thirty-two respondents (23.7%) took nothing to treat the infection. Of them, only 64.3% completed their drugs regimen during their last episode with 35.7% reporting that fever subsided on/before day 2 of treatment and 64.3% reported that fever subsided two days post treatment. The majority (83.3%) of respondents had no adverse reaction to the drugs used (16.7% reported drowsiness, nausea, headaches and vomiting) with 64% of the respondents reporting that they will use ACT again anytime they have malaria and about 65% reported that the drug was very convenient for them (χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.192, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The control of drug resistance in malaria parasites requires reducing the overall drug pressure, improving the ways the drugs are used and prescribing follow-up practices. The use of drug combinations that are not likely to foster resistance like ACT is also a good measure of resistance control. ACT would be expected to remain the key anti-malarial drug for treatment of multidrug resistance <i>P. falciparum</i> since there are no alternative drugs available at present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MalariaWorld journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MalariaWorld journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10732924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MalariaWorld journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10732924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物的偏好、使用和求医行为对疟疾的治疗以及抗药性的预防和管理非常重要:采用半结构式问卷对 135 名受访者进行了横断面描述性研究,以评估尼日利亚奥孙州埃德 Alajue 的农村居民和拉各斯州巴达格里 Ajara 的城郊居民对抗疟药物的偏好和使用情况:食欲不振、发烧、畏寒和僵硬、头痛和呕吐是最常见的症状(分别占 83.3%、78.6%、71.4%、69.0% 和 64.3%)。半数以上(57.1%)的受访者的药物是由合格的医疗人员开具的。68名受访者(50.3%)使用青蒿素类复方疗法(ACT)治疗疟疾,使用磺胺乙胺嘧啶(SP)、扑热息痛和草药的受访者分别占 11.9%、9.6%和 4.4%。32 名受访者(23.7%)没有服用任何药物来治疗感染。其中,只有 64.3% 的受访者在最后一次发病时完成了药物治疗,35.7% 的受访者表示在治疗第 2 天或之前退烧,64.3% 的受访者表示在治疗后两天退烧。大多数受访者(83.3%)对所使用的药物无不良反应(16.7%的受访者报告有嗜睡、恶心、头痛和呕吐症状),64%的受访者报告说他们在任何时候患疟疾时都会再次使用 ACT,约 65%的受访者报告说这种药物对他们来说非常方便(χ2 = 18.192,P = 0.001):要控制疟原虫的抗药性,就必须降低总体用药压力、改进用药方式和处方跟踪实践。使用 ACT 等不易产生抗药性的药物组合也是控制抗药性的良好措施。由于目前还没有替代药物,预计青蒿素综合疗法仍将是治疗恶性疟原虫多药耐药性的主要抗疟药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimalarial medicine preference and usage in rural and peri-urban communities in Lagos and Osun states in southwestern Nigeria.

Background: Medicine preference, usage and health-seeking behaviour are very important in the treatment of malaria and prevention and management of drug resistance.

Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study, using a semi-structured questionnaire administered to 135 respondents, was carried out to assess antimalarial drug preference and usage among rural dwellers in Alajue, Ede, Osun State and peri-urban dwellers in Ajara, Badagry, Lagos State, Nigeria.

Results: Loss of appetite, fever, chill and rigour, headache and vomiting were the most frequently reported symptoms (83.3%, 78.6%, 71.4%, 69.0% and 64.3%, respectively). More than half (57.1%) of the respondents had their drugs prescribed by a qualified health practitioner. Sixty-eight (50.3%) respondents treated malaria with Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) while Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP), paracetamol and herbal medicine usage was reported by 11.9%, 9.6% and 4.4% of the respondents, respectively. Thirty-two respondents (23.7%) took nothing to treat the infection. Of them, only 64.3% completed their drugs regimen during their last episode with 35.7% reporting that fever subsided on/before day 2 of treatment and 64.3% reported that fever subsided two days post treatment. The majority (83.3%) of respondents had no adverse reaction to the drugs used (16.7% reported drowsiness, nausea, headaches and vomiting) with 64% of the respondents reporting that they will use ACT again anytime they have malaria and about 65% reported that the drug was very convenient for them (χ2 = 18.192, p = 0.001).

Conclusions: The control of drug resistance in malaria parasites requires reducing the overall drug pressure, improving the ways the drugs are used and prescribing follow-up practices. The use of drug combinations that are not likely to foster resistance like ACT is also a good measure of resistance control. ACT would be expected to remain the key anti-malarial drug for treatment of multidrug resistance P. falciparum since there are no alternative drugs available at present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biochemical features of the Cry4B toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and its interaction with BT-R3, a bitopic cadherin G-protein coupled receptor in Anopheles gambiae. Relapsing Plasmodium vivax malaria in a 12-year-old Brazilian girl: A case report. Uneasy bedfellows: Public-Private partnerships for malaria control. Palestine 100 years ago seen through the malaria lens: an examination of successful malaria elimination, and of where the malaria community seems to have taken a wrong turning Regaining the path to malaria elimination: Lessons from the pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1