鞘内注射巴氯芬治疗脑卒中患者痉挛的疗效:一项 Meta 分析。

Brain & NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.12786/bn.2024.17.e3
Ki Deok Park, Min-Keun Song
{"title":"鞘内注射巴氯芬治疗脑卒中患者痉挛的疗效:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Ki Deok Park, Min-Keun Song","doi":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although intrathecal baclofen injections have been used for spasticity management regarding stroke, spinal cord injury, and central nervous system diseases, their relative efficacy is controversial. This systematic review scoured 3 multinational electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase) to isolate relevant studies. We analyzed non-randomized studies and randomized control trials (RCTs) with direct comparisons against other spasticity management interventions for adult stroke patients. Risk of Bias (RoB) and the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies evaluations were implemented with Cochrane's RoB tool. Meta-analysis was performed with Revman 5.4, and evidence validity was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. Lastly, the intrathecal baclofen injection meta-analysis included 2 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs for assessing spasticity and 4 non-RCTs to measure gait velocity. Based on this data, intrathecal baclofen injection significantly impacted spasticity and gait speed. Thus, intrathecal baclofen injection can potentially treat severe spasticity unresponsive to conventional spasticity therapy. Furthermore, clinicians must consider individual patient characteristics and conditions when contemplating intrathecal baclofen injection for spasticity intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrathecal Baclofen Injection Efficacy for Spasticity Management in Patients With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ki Deok Park, Min-Keun Song\",\"doi\":\"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although intrathecal baclofen injections have been used for spasticity management regarding stroke, spinal cord injury, and central nervous system diseases, their relative efficacy is controversial. This systematic review scoured 3 multinational electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase) to isolate relevant studies. We analyzed non-randomized studies and randomized control trials (RCTs) with direct comparisons against other spasticity management interventions for adult stroke patients. Risk of Bias (RoB) and the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies evaluations were implemented with Cochrane's RoB tool. Meta-analysis was performed with Revman 5.4, and evidence validity was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. Lastly, the intrathecal baclofen injection meta-analysis included 2 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs for assessing spasticity and 4 non-RCTs to measure gait velocity. Based on this data, intrathecal baclofen injection significantly impacted spasticity and gait speed. Thus, intrathecal baclofen injection can potentially treat severe spasticity unresponsive to conventional spasticity therapy. Furthermore, clinicians must consider individual patient characteristics and conditions when contemplating intrathecal baclofen injection for spasticity intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2024.17.e3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2024.17.e3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管鞘内注射巴氯芬已被用于中风、脊髓损伤和中枢神经系统疾病的痉挛治疗,但其相对疗效仍存在争议。本系统性综述检索了 3 个跨国电子数据库(Cochrane Library、MEDLINE 和 Embase),以筛选出相关研究。我们分析了非随机研究和随机对照试验 (RCT),并将其与针对成年中风患者的其他痉挛管理干预措施进行了直接比较。使用 Cochrane 的 RoB 工具评估了非随机研究的偏倚风险(RoB)和偏倚风险评估工具。使用 Revman 5.4 进行了 Meta 分析,并使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级法评估了证据有效性。最后,鞘内注射巴氯芬的荟萃分析包括 2 项评估痉挛的研究性试验和 7 项非研究性试验,以及 4 项测量步速的非研究性试验。根据这些数据,鞘内注射巴氯芬对痉挛和步速有显著影响。因此,鞘内注射巴氯芬有可能治疗对传统痉挛疗法无反应的严重痉挛。此外,临床医生在考虑鞘内注射巴氯芬进行痉挛干预时,必须考虑患者的个体特征和病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intrathecal Baclofen Injection Efficacy for Spasticity Management in Patients With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

Although intrathecal baclofen injections have been used for spasticity management regarding stroke, spinal cord injury, and central nervous system diseases, their relative efficacy is controversial. This systematic review scoured 3 multinational electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase) to isolate relevant studies. We analyzed non-randomized studies and randomized control trials (RCTs) with direct comparisons against other spasticity management interventions for adult stroke patients. Risk of Bias (RoB) and the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies evaluations were implemented with Cochrane's RoB tool. Meta-analysis was performed with Revman 5.4, and evidence validity was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. Lastly, the intrathecal baclofen injection meta-analysis included 2 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs for assessing spasticity and 4 non-RCTs to measure gait velocity. Based on this data, intrathecal baclofen injection significantly impacted spasticity and gait speed. Thus, intrathecal baclofen injection can potentially treat severe spasticity unresponsive to conventional spasticity therapy. Furthermore, clinicians must consider individual patient characteristics and conditions when contemplating intrathecal baclofen injection for spasticity intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability of Surface Electromyography From the Lower-limb Muscles During Maximal and Submaximal Voluntary Isometric Contractions in In-bed Healthy Individuals and Patients With Subacute Stroke. Is the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) Useful in Evaluating the Cognitive Function of Brain Injury Patients?: Through Correlation Analysis With Computerized Neurocognitive Test (CNT). Cerebrolysin Concentrate: Therapeutic Potential for Severe Oral Apraxia After Stroke: A Case Report. Sarcopenia Diagnostic Technique Based on Artificial Intelligence Using Bio-signal of Neuromuscular System: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Feasibility of Sarcopenia Diagnosis Using Stimulated Muscle Contraction Signal in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1