基于自动系统的血液培养阳性时间诊断性能,以区分真正的菌血症和污染物。

Aracely Laque-Ale, Miguel Hueda-Zavaleta, Juan Carlos Gómez de la Torre, Luis Alvarado, José Alonso Cáceres Del Águila
{"title":"基于自动系统的血液培养阳性时间诊断性能,以区分真正的菌血症和污染物。","authors":"Aracely Laque-Ale, Miguel Hueda-Zavaleta, Juan Carlos Gómez de la Torre, Luis Alvarado, José Alonso Cáceres Del Águila","doi":"10.17843/rpmesp.2023.404.12724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective.: </strong>To determine the diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times for distinguishing true bacteremia from contaminants in the automated \"BACT/ALERT®\" system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods.: </strong>A cross-sectional, diagnostic test-type study was conducted from a database of blood culture samples processed between January 2016 and August 2021. All blood culture samples from patients with suspected bacteremia were included; blood culture samples were entered into the \"BACT/ALERT®\" system to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>We obtained 33,951 blood cultures samples, of which 3875 were positive. Of the total number of positive blood cultures, 75.2% (n=2913) were true bacteremia and 24.8% (n=962) were contaminants. The median time to positivity in blood cultures with true bacteremia was significantly shorter (16.3 hours; IQR: 11.2 - 24.9) than the median time to positivity of blood cultures with contaminants (22.5 hours; IQR: 18.4 - 31.8; p<0.001). The positivity time showed the capacity to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants, with an AUC-ROC of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.71 - 0.75), with 85% and 63% sensitivity and specificity respectively for the diagnosis of contaminants when the positivity time exceeds 16.5 hours. The use of antibiotics prior to sampling delayed the time to positivity, while having fever before sampling shortened the time to positivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.: </strong>Our results show good diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants using the \"BACT/ALERT®\" system when the positivity time was longer than 16.5 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":53651,"journal":{"name":"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica","volume":"40 4","pages":"451-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11138833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of the time to positivity of blood cultures to distinguish true bacteremia from contaminants based on an automated system.\",\"authors\":\"Aracely Laque-Ale, Miguel Hueda-Zavaleta, Juan Carlos Gómez de la Torre, Luis Alvarado, José Alonso Cáceres Del Águila\",\"doi\":\"10.17843/rpmesp.2023.404.12724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective.: </strong>To determine the diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times for distinguishing true bacteremia from contaminants in the automated \\\"BACT/ALERT®\\\" system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods.: </strong>A cross-sectional, diagnostic test-type study was conducted from a database of blood culture samples processed between January 2016 and August 2021. All blood culture samples from patients with suspected bacteremia were included; blood culture samples were entered into the \\\"BACT/ALERT®\\\" system to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>We obtained 33,951 blood cultures samples, of which 3875 were positive. Of the total number of positive blood cultures, 75.2% (n=2913) were true bacteremia and 24.8% (n=962) were contaminants. The median time to positivity in blood cultures with true bacteremia was significantly shorter (16.3 hours; IQR: 11.2 - 24.9) than the median time to positivity of blood cultures with contaminants (22.5 hours; IQR: 18.4 - 31.8; p<0.001). The positivity time showed the capacity to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants, with an AUC-ROC of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.71 - 0.75), with 85% and 63% sensitivity and specificity respectively for the diagnosis of contaminants when the positivity time exceeds 16.5 hours. The use of antibiotics prior to sampling delayed the time to positivity, while having fever before sampling shortened the time to positivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.: </strong>Our results show good diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants using the \\\"BACT/ALERT®\\\" system when the positivity time was longer than 16.5 hours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"451-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11138833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2023.404.12724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2023.404.12724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定自动 "BACT/ALERT®"系统中血培养阳性时间的诊断性能,以区分真正的菌血症和污染物:根据 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月期间处理的血培养样本数据库开展了一项横断面诊断测试型研究。所有疑似菌血症患者的血培养样本均被纳入其中;血培养样本被输入 "BACT/ALERT®"系统,以区分真正的菌血症和污染物:我们获得了 33951 份血液培养样本,其中 3875 份呈阳性。在阳性血培养样本总数中,75.2%(n=2913)为真正的菌血症,24.8%(n=962)为污染物。真菌血症血培养阳性的中位时间(16.3 小时;IQR:11.2 - 24.9)明显短于污染物血培养阳性的中位时间(22.5 小时;IQR:18.4 - 31.8;p结论:我们的研究结果表明,当血培养阳性时间超过 16.5 小时时,使用 "BACT/ALERT®"系统区分真正的菌血症和污染物的诊断性能良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic performance of the time to positivity of blood cultures to distinguish true bacteremia from contaminants based on an automated system.

Objective.: To determine the diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times for distinguishing true bacteremia from contaminants in the automated "BACT/ALERT®" system.

Materials and methods.: A cross-sectional, diagnostic test-type study was conducted from a database of blood culture samples processed between January 2016 and August 2021. All blood culture samples from patients with suspected bacteremia were included; blood culture samples were entered into the "BACT/ALERT®" system to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants.

Results.: We obtained 33,951 blood cultures samples, of which 3875 were positive. Of the total number of positive blood cultures, 75.2% (n=2913) were true bacteremia and 24.8% (n=962) were contaminants. The median time to positivity in blood cultures with true bacteremia was significantly shorter (16.3 hours; IQR: 11.2 - 24.9) than the median time to positivity of blood cultures with contaminants (22.5 hours; IQR: 18.4 - 31.8; p<0.001). The positivity time showed the capacity to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants, with an AUC-ROC of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.71 - 0.75), with 85% and 63% sensitivity and specificity respectively for the diagnosis of contaminants when the positivity time exceeds 16.5 hours. The use of antibiotics prior to sampling delayed the time to positivity, while having fever before sampling shortened the time to positivity.

Conclusions.: Our results show good diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants using the "BACT/ALERT®" system when the positivity time was longer than 16.5 hours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica
Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública (RPMESP) es el órgano oficial de difusión científica del Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS) del Perú. Es una publicación arbitrada por pares, de periodicidad trimestral, de ámbito y difusión mundial, indizada en MEDLINE/Index Medicos, SCOPUS, EMBASE, SciELO Salud Pública y otras bases de datos internacionales. La RPMESP es distribuida en su versión impresa y electrónica, con acceso gratuito a texto completo. La RPMESP publica artículos referidos a temas del ámbito biomédico y de salud pública, resaltando aportes prácticos, que contribuyan a mejorar la situación de salud del país y de la región. Propicia el intercambio de la experiencia científica en salud entre instituciones y personas dedicadas a la investigación dentro y fuera del Perú a fin de promover el avance y la aplicación de la investigación en salud.
期刊最新文献
Aedes aegypti feeding behavior during dengue outbreaks in two rural areas of Peru during the Yaku cyclone and El Niño phenomenon of 2023. Characteristics and survival of adults with differentiated thyroid cancer in a Peruvian hospital. Characteristics of COVID-19-associated multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children treated in a Peruvian hospital, 2020-2022. Coexistence and food sources of adult mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a rural health center in Piura, Peru 2024. COVID-19 and protection measures adopted in rural amazon communities during the first months of the pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1