18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT 在检测原发性肿瘤和治疗阑尾肿瘤方面优于 18F-FDG PET/CT 和 CE-CT。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Imaging Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1186/s40644-024-00706-7
Ye Dong, Shun Huang, Hubing Wu, Min Cao, Yanchao Huang, Ganghua Tang, Wenlan Zhou
{"title":"18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT 在检测原发性肿瘤和治疗阑尾肿瘤方面优于 18F-FDG PET/CT 和 CE-CT。","authors":"Ye Dong, Shun Huang, Hubing Wu, Min Cao, Yanchao Huang, Ganghua Tang, Wenlan Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s40644-024-00706-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the present study, we investigated the value of <sup>18</sup>F-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT) to preoperative evaluations of appendiceal neoplasms and management for patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective clinical study, including 16 untreated and 6 treated patients, was performed from January 2022 to May 2023 at Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital. Histopathologic examination and imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT was compared to <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) in terms of maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), diagnostic efficacy and impact on treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accurate detection of primary tumors and peritoneal metastases were improved from 28.6% (4/14) and 50% (8/16) for CE-CT, and 43.8% (7/16) and 85.0% (17/20) for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, to 87.5% (14/16) and 100% (20/20) for <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT. Compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT detected more regions infiltrated by peritoneal metastases (108 vs. 43), thus produced a higher peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score (median PCI: 12 vs. 5, P < 0.01). <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT changed the intended treatment plans in 35.7% (5/14) of patients compared to CE-CT and 25% (4/16) of patients compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT but did not improve the management of patients with recurrent tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study revealed that <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT can supplement CE-CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT to provide a more accurate detection of appendiceal neoplasms and improved treatment decision making for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superiority of <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT in the detection of primary tumor and management of appendiceal neoplasm to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and CE-CT.\",\"authors\":\"Ye Dong, Shun Huang, Hubing Wu, Min Cao, Yanchao Huang, Ganghua Tang, Wenlan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40644-024-00706-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the present study, we investigated the value of <sup>18</sup>F-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT) to preoperative evaluations of appendiceal neoplasms and management for patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective clinical study, including 16 untreated and 6 treated patients, was performed from January 2022 to May 2023 at Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital. Histopathologic examination and imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT was compared to <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) in terms of maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), diagnostic efficacy and impact on treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accurate detection of primary tumors and peritoneal metastases were improved from 28.6% (4/14) and 50% (8/16) for CE-CT, and 43.8% (7/16) and 85.0% (17/20) for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, to 87.5% (14/16) and 100% (20/20) for <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT. Compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT detected more regions infiltrated by peritoneal metastases (108 vs. 43), thus produced a higher peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score (median PCI: 12 vs. 5, P < 0.01). <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT changed the intended treatment plans in 35.7% (5/14) of patients compared to CE-CT and 25% (4/16) of patients compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT but did not improve the management of patients with recurrent tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study revealed that <sup>18</sup>F-FAPI-42 PET/CT can supplement CE-CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT to provide a more accurate detection of appendiceal neoplasms and improved treatment decision making for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00706-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00706-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究探讨了18F-成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂(FAPI)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT)对阑尾肿瘤术前评估和患者管理的价值:这项单中心回顾性临床研究于2022年1月至2023年5月在南方医科大学南方医院进行,包括16例未治疗和6例已治疗的患者。组织病理学检查和影像学随访作为参考标准。18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT与18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)PET/CT和对比增强CT(CE-CT)在最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、诊断效果和对治疗决策的影响方面进行了比较:原发肿瘤和腹膜转移瘤的准确检测率从CE-CT的28.6%(4/14)和50%(8/16)、18F-FDG PET/CT的43.8%(7/16)和85.0%(17/20)提高到18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT的87.5%(14/16)和100%(20/20)。与 18F-FDG PET/CT 相比,18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT 发现了更多的腹膜转移浸润区域(108 对 43),因此腹膜癌指数 (PCI) 得分更高(PCI 中位数:12 对 5,P 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT 为 0.0%(17/20)),而 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT 为 87.5%(14/16)和 100%(20/20)。18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT 与 CE-CT 相比改变了 35.7% (5/14)患者的原定治疗方案,与 18F-FDG PET/CT 相比改变了 25% (4/16)患者的原定治疗方案,但并未改善复发肿瘤患者的治疗:本研究显示,18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT 可作为 CE-CT 和 18F-FDG PET/CT 的补充,从而更准确地检测阑尾肿瘤并改善患者的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Superiority of 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT in the detection of primary tumor and management of appendiceal neoplasm to 18F-FDG PET/CT and CE-CT.

Background: In the present study, we investigated the value of 18F-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT) to preoperative evaluations of appendiceal neoplasms and management for patients.

Methods: This single-center retrospective clinical study, including 16 untreated and 6 treated patients, was performed from January 2022 to May 2023 at Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital. Histopathologic examination and imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT was compared to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) in terms of maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), diagnostic efficacy and impact on treatment decisions.

Results: The accurate detection of primary tumors and peritoneal metastases were improved from 28.6% (4/14) and 50% (8/16) for CE-CT, and 43.8% (7/16) and 85.0% (17/20) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, to 87.5% (14/16) and 100% (20/20) for 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT. Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT detected more regions infiltrated by peritoneal metastases (108 vs. 43), thus produced a higher peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score (median PCI: 12 vs. 5, P < 0.01). 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT changed the intended treatment plans in 35.7% (5/14) of patients compared to CE-CT and 25% (4/16) of patients compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT but did not improve the management of patients with recurrent tumors.

Conclusions: The present study revealed that 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT can supplement CE-CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT to provide a more accurate detection of appendiceal neoplasms and improved treatment decision making for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
期刊最新文献
Clinical significance of visual cardiac 18F-FDG uptake in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures. Seeing through "brain fog": neuroimaging assessment and imaging biomarkers for cancer-related cognitive impairments. Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis with short diameter less than 8 mm in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on radiomics. A call for objectivity: Radiologists' proposed wishlist for response evaluation in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1