有轻度脑外伤史和无轻度脑外伤史退伍军人的前瞻性记忆表现:载脂蛋白 E (APOE) ε4基因型的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1080/13803395.2024.2351205
Jennifer S Adler, Erin D Ozturk, Victoria C Merritt, Lisa Delano-Wood, Dawn M Schiehser, Mark W Bondi, Monica T Ly, Adan Ton-Loy, Scott F Sorg
{"title":"有轻度脑外伤史和无轻度脑外伤史退伍军人的前瞻性记忆表现:载脂蛋白 E (APOE) ε4基因型的影响。","authors":"Jennifer S Adler, Erin D Ozturk, Victoria C Merritt, Lisa Delano-Wood, Dawn M Schiehser, Mark W Bondi, Monica T Ly, Adan Ton-Loy, Scott F Sorg","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2024.2351205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identifying factors that moderate cognitive outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is crucial. Prospective memory (PM) is a cognitive domain of interest in mTBI recovery as it may be especially sensitive to TBI-related changes. Since studies show that genetic status - particularly possession of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele - can modify PM performance, we investigated associations between mTBI status and APOE-ε4 genotype on PM performance in a well-characterized sample of Veterans with neurotrauma histories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>59 Veterans (mTBI = 33, Military Controls [MCs] = 26; age range: 24-50; average years post-injury = 10.41) underwent a structured clinical interview, neuropsychological assessment, and genotyping. The Memory for Intentions Test (MIST) measured PM across multiple subscales. ANCOVAs, adjusting for age and posttraumatic stress symptoms, tested the effects of mTBI status (mTBI vs. MC) and ε4 status (ε4+ vs. ε4-) on MIST scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans with mTBI history performed more poorly compared to MCs on the MIST 15-min delay (<i>p</i>=.002, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.160), Time Cue (<i>p</i> = .003, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.157), and PM Total (<i>p</i> = .016, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.102). Those with at least one copy of the ε4 allele performed more poorly compared to ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay (<i>p</i> = .011, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.113) and PM Total (<i>p</i> = .048, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .071). No significant interactions were observed between mTBI and APOE-ε4 status on MIST outcomes (<i>p</i>s>.25). Within the mTBI group, APOE-ε4+ Veterans performed worse than APOE-ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay subscale (<i>p</i> = .031, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .150).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mTBI history and APOE-ε4 genotype status were independently associated with worse PM performance compared to those without head injury histories or possession of the APOE-e4 genotype. Performance on the MIST 15-min delay was worse in Veterans with both risk factors (mTBI history and APOE-ε4 positivity). Findings suggest that genetic status may modify outcomes even in relatively young Veterans with mTBI histories. Future research examining longitudinal associations and links to neuroimaging and biomarker data are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective memory performance in veterans with and without histories of mild traumatic brain injury: effect of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer S Adler, Erin D Ozturk, Victoria C Merritt, Lisa Delano-Wood, Dawn M Schiehser, Mark W Bondi, Monica T Ly, Adan Ton-Loy, Scott F Sorg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13803395.2024.2351205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identifying factors that moderate cognitive outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is crucial. Prospective memory (PM) is a cognitive domain of interest in mTBI recovery as it may be especially sensitive to TBI-related changes. Since studies show that genetic status - particularly possession of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele - can modify PM performance, we investigated associations between mTBI status and APOE-ε4 genotype on PM performance in a well-characterized sample of Veterans with neurotrauma histories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>59 Veterans (mTBI = 33, Military Controls [MCs] = 26; age range: 24-50; average years post-injury = 10.41) underwent a structured clinical interview, neuropsychological assessment, and genotyping. The Memory for Intentions Test (MIST) measured PM across multiple subscales. ANCOVAs, adjusting for age and posttraumatic stress symptoms, tested the effects of mTBI status (mTBI vs. MC) and ε4 status (ε4+ vs. ε4-) on MIST scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans with mTBI history performed more poorly compared to MCs on the MIST 15-min delay (<i>p</i>=.002, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.160), Time Cue (<i>p</i> = .003, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.157), and PM Total (<i>p</i> = .016, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.102). Those with at least one copy of the ε4 allele performed more poorly compared to ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay (<i>p</i> = .011, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> =.113) and PM Total (<i>p</i> = .048, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .071). No significant interactions were observed between mTBI and APOE-ε4 status on MIST outcomes (<i>p</i>s>.25). Within the mTBI group, APOE-ε4+ Veterans performed worse than APOE-ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay subscale (<i>p</i> = .031, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .150).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mTBI history and APOE-ε4 genotype status were independently associated with worse PM performance compared to those without head injury histories or possession of the APOE-e4 genotype. Performance on the MIST 15-min delay was worse in Veterans with both risk factors (mTBI history and APOE-ε4 positivity). Findings suggest that genetic status may modify outcomes even in relatively young Veterans with mTBI histories. Future research examining longitudinal associations and links to neuroimaging and biomarker data are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2351205\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2351205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定影响轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后认知结果的因素至关重要。前瞻性记忆(PM)是轻微创伤性脑损伤恢复中一个值得关注的认知领域,因为它可能对创伤性脑损伤相关的变化特别敏感。由于研究表明遗传状态--尤其是拥有脂蛋白E(APOE)ε4等位基因--会改变前瞻性记忆的表现,因此我们在具有神经创伤史的退伍军人样本中调查了mTBI状态和APOE-ε4基因型对前瞻性记忆表现的影响。方法:59名退伍军人(mTBI=33人,军事对照组[MCs]=26人;年龄范围:24-50岁;伤后平均年数=10.41年)接受了结构化临床访谈、神经心理学评估和基因分型。意向记忆测试(MIST)通过多个分量表测量 PM。在对年龄和创伤后应激症状进行调整后,方差分析检验了mTBI状态(mTBI vs. MC)和ε4状态(ε4+ vs. ε4-)对MIST得分的影响:与 MCs 相比,有 mTBI 史的退伍军人在 MIST 15 分钟延迟(p=.002,ηp2 =.160)、时间线索(p=.003,ηp2 =.157)和 PM 总分(p=.016,ηp2 =.102)上的表现更差。与ε4-退伍军人相比,至少有一个ε4等位基因拷贝的人在MIST 15分钟延迟(p = .011,ηp2 = .113)和PM总分(p = .048,ηp2 = .071)上的表现更差。mTBI 和 APOE-ε4 状态之间在 MIST 结果上没有观察到明显的交互作用(ps>.25)。在mTBI组中,APOE-ε4+退伍军人在MIST 15分钟延迟分量表上的表现比APOE-ε4-退伍军人差(p = .031,ηp2 = .150)。结论:与没有头部损伤史或拥有APOE-e4基因型的退伍军人相比,mTBI史和APOE-ε4基因型状态与较差的PM表现独立相关。同时具有这两种风险因素(mTBI史和APOE-ε4阳性)的退伍军人在MIST 15分钟延迟中的表现更差。研究结果表明,即使是有 mTBI 史的相对年轻的退伍军人,其遗传状况也可能会改变其结果。未来需要对纵向关联以及与神经影像学和生物标记物数据的联系进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospective memory performance in veterans with and without histories of mild traumatic brain injury: effect of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype.

Objective: Identifying factors that moderate cognitive outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is crucial. Prospective memory (PM) is a cognitive domain of interest in mTBI recovery as it may be especially sensitive to TBI-related changes. Since studies show that genetic status - particularly possession of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele - can modify PM performance, we investigated associations between mTBI status and APOE-ε4 genotype on PM performance in a well-characterized sample of Veterans with neurotrauma histories.

Methods: 59 Veterans (mTBI = 33, Military Controls [MCs] = 26; age range: 24-50; average years post-injury = 10.41) underwent a structured clinical interview, neuropsychological assessment, and genotyping. The Memory for Intentions Test (MIST) measured PM across multiple subscales. ANCOVAs, adjusting for age and posttraumatic stress symptoms, tested the effects of mTBI status (mTBI vs. MC) and ε4 status (ε4+ vs. ε4-) on MIST scores.

Results: Veterans with mTBI history performed more poorly compared to MCs on the MIST 15-min delay (p=.002, ηp2 =.160), Time Cue (p = .003, ηp2 =.157), and PM Total (p = .016, ηp2 =.102). Those with at least one copy of the ε4 allele performed more poorly compared to ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay (p = .011, ηp2 =.113) and PM Total (p = .048, ηp2 = .071). No significant interactions were observed between mTBI and APOE-ε4 status on MIST outcomes (ps>.25). Within the mTBI group, APOE-ε4+ Veterans performed worse than APOE-ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay subscale (p = .031, ηp2 = .150).

Conclusions: mTBI history and APOE-ε4 genotype status were independently associated with worse PM performance compared to those without head injury histories or possession of the APOE-e4 genotype. Performance on the MIST 15-min delay was worse in Veterans with both risk factors (mTBI history and APOE-ε4 positivity). Findings suggest that genetic status may modify outcomes even in relatively young Veterans with mTBI histories. Future research examining longitudinal associations and links to neuroimaging and biomarker data are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive deficits in ALS patients with SOD1 mutations. Evaluating practice effects across learning trials - ceiling effects or something more? The complex interplay between cognitive reserve, age of diagnosis and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: a retrospective study. Posttraumatic stress symptoms in recovery from concussion. Identifying conflict monitoring as a specific executive component that contributes to impaired self-awareness in patients with acquired brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1