人工智能作为正颌外科手术评估的预测工具。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12805
Pedro Henrique José de Oliveira, Tengfei Li, Haoyue Li, João Roberto Gonçalves, Ary Santos-Pinto, Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Junior, Lucia Soares Cevidanes, Claudia Toyama, Guilherme Paladini Feltrin, Antonio Augusto Campanha, Melchiades Alves de Oliveira Junior, Jonas Bianchi
{"title":"人工智能作为正颌外科手术评估的预测工具。","authors":"Pedro Henrique José de Oliveira,&nbsp;Tengfei Li,&nbsp;Haoyue Li,&nbsp;João Roberto Gonçalves,&nbsp;Ary Santos-Pinto,&nbsp;Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Junior,&nbsp;Lucia Soares Cevidanes,&nbsp;Claudia Toyama,&nbsp;Guilherme Paladini Feltrin,&nbsp;Antonio Augusto Campanha,&nbsp;Melchiades Alves de Oliveira Junior,&nbsp;Jonas Bianchi","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>An ideal orthodontic treatment involves qualitative and quantitative measurements of dental and skeletal components to evaluate patients' discrepancies, such as facial, occlusal, and functional characteristics. Deciding between orthodontics and orthognathic surgery remains challenging, especially in borderline patients. Advances in technology are aiding clinical decisions in orthodontics. The increasing availability of data and the era of big data enable the use of artificial intelligence to guide clinicians' diagnoses. This study aims to test the capacity of different machine learning (ML) models to predict whether orthognathic surgery or orthodontics treatment is required, using soft and hard tissue cephalometric values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 920 lateral radiographs from patients previously treated with either conventional orthodontics or in combination with orthognathic surgery were used, comprising <i>n</i> = 558 Class II and <i>n</i> = 362 Class III patients, respectively. Thirty-two measures were obtained from each cephalogram at the initial appointment. The subjects were randomly divided into training (<i>n</i> = 552), validation (<i>n</i> = 183), and test (<i>n</i> = 185) datasets, both as an entire sample and divided into Class II and Class III sub-groups. The extracted data were evaluated using 10 machine learning models and by a four-expert panel consisting of orthodontists (<i>n</i> = 2) and surgeons (<i>n</i> = 2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The combined prediction of 10 models showed top-ranked performance in the testing dataset for accuracy, F1-score, and AUC (entire sample: 0.707, 0.706, 0.791; Class II: 0.759, 0.758, 0.824; Class III: 0.822, 0.807, 0.89).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed combined 10 ML approach model accurately predicted the need for orthognathic surgery, showing better performance in Class III patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessment\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Henrique José de Oliveira,&nbsp;Tengfei Li,&nbsp;Haoyue Li,&nbsp;João Roberto Gonçalves,&nbsp;Ary Santos-Pinto,&nbsp;Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Junior,&nbsp;Lucia Soares Cevidanes,&nbsp;Claudia Toyama,&nbsp;Guilherme Paladini Feltrin,&nbsp;Antonio Augusto Campanha,&nbsp;Melchiades Alves de Oliveira Junior,&nbsp;Jonas Bianchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>An ideal orthodontic treatment involves qualitative and quantitative measurements of dental and skeletal components to evaluate patients' discrepancies, such as facial, occlusal, and functional characteristics. Deciding between orthodontics and orthognathic surgery remains challenging, especially in borderline patients. Advances in technology are aiding clinical decisions in orthodontics. The increasing availability of data and the era of big data enable the use of artificial intelligence to guide clinicians' diagnoses. This study aims to test the capacity of different machine learning (ML) models to predict whether orthognathic surgery or orthodontics treatment is required, using soft and hard tissue cephalometric values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 920 lateral radiographs from patients previously treated with either conventional orthodontics or in combination with orthognathic surgery were used, comprising <i>n</i> = 558 Class II and <i>n</i> = 362 Class III patients, respectively. Thirty-two measures were obtained from each cephalogram at the initial appointment. The subjects were randomly divided into training (<i>n</i> = 552), validation (<i>n</i> = 183), and test (<i>n</i> = 185) datasets, both as an entire sample and divided into Class II and Class III sub-groups. The extracted data were evaluated using 10 machine learning models and by a four-expert panel consisting of orthodontists (<i>n</i> = 2) and surgeons (<i>n</i> = 2).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The combined prediction of 10 models showed top-ranked performance in the testing dataset for accuracy, F1-score, and AUC (entire sample: 0.707, 0.706, 0.791; Class II: 0.759, 0.758, 0.824; Class III: 0.822, 0.807, 0.89).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The proposed combined 10 ML approach model accurately predicted the need for orthognathic surgery, showing better performance in Class III patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介理想的正畸治疗包括对牙齿和骨骼的定性和定量测量,以评估患者的差异,如面部、咬合和功能特征。在正畸和正颌外科手术之间做出抉择仍然具有挑战性,尤其是对于边缘患者。技术的进步为正畸的临床决策提供了帮助。数据可用性的不断提高和大数据时代的到来,使人工智能能够用于指导临床医生的诊断。本研究旨在测试不同机器学习(ML)模型的能力,利用软硬组织头颅测量值预测是否需要正颌外科手术或正畸治疗:共使用了920张患者的侧位X光片,这些患者曾接受过传统正畸治疗或结合正颌外科手术治疗,分别包括n = 558名II类患者和n = 362名III类患者。在初次就诊时,从每张头影图中获得 32 个测量值。受试者被随机分为训练数据集(n = 552)、验证数据集(n = 183)和测试数据集(n = 185)。提取的数据由 10 个机器学习模型和由正畸学家(n = 2)和外科医生(n = 2)组成的四人专家小组进行评估:在测试数据集中,10 个模型的组合预测在准确率、F1 分数和 AUC 方面均表现优异(全样本:0.707, 0.706, 0.791;II 类:0.759, 0.758, 0.824;III 类:0.822, 0.807, 0.89):所提出的 10 ML 组合方法模型能准确预测正颌外科手术的需求,在 III 类患者中表现更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessment

Introduction

An ideal orthodontic treatment involves qualitative and quantitative measurements of dental and skeletal components to evaluate patients' discrepancies, such as facial, occlusal, and functional characteristics. Deciding between orthodontics and orthognathic surgery remains challenging, especially in borderline patients. Advances in technology are aiding clinical decisions in orthodontics. The increasing availability of data and the era of big data enable the use of artificial intelligence to guide clinicians' diagnoses. This study aims to test the capacity of different machine learning (ML) models to predict whether orthognathic surgery or orthodontics treatment is required, using soft and hard tissue cephalometric values.

Methods

A total of 920 lateral radiographs from patients previously treated with either conventional orthodontics or in combination with orthognathic surgery were used, comprising n = 558 Class II and n = 362 Class III patients, respectively. Thirty-two measures were obtained from each cephalogram at the initial appointment. The subjects were randomly divided into training (n = 552), validation (n = 183), and test (n = 185) datasets, both as an entire sample and divided into Class II and Class III sub-groups. The extracted data were evaluated using 10 machine learning models and by a four-expert panel consisting of orthodontists (n = 2) and surgeons (n = 2).

Results

The combined prediction of 10 models showed top-ranked performance in the testing dataset for accuracy, F1-score, and AUC (entire sample: 0.707, 0.706, 0.791; Class II: 0.759, 0.758, 0.824; Class III: 0.822, 0.807, 0.89).

Conclusions

The proposed combined 10 ML approach model accurately predicted the need for orthognathic surgery, showing better performance in Class III patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1