腹膜外与经腹膜根治性膀胱切除术的利弊。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.22037/uj.v20i.8140
Farzad Allameh, Amir Hossein Eslami
{"title":"腹膜外与经腹膜根治性膀胱切除术的利弊。","authors":"Farzad Allameh, Amir Hossein Eslami","doi":"10.22037/uj.v20i.8140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most common cancers of the urinary tract is bladder tumors. Bladder cancers are divided into two groups: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. (1)  Trans-Peritoneal  Radical Cystectomy (RC) with  pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard technique in muscle invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (2). and Urologist around the world are more familiar with trans-peritoneal technique. In some articles extra-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) implied as an decreased  postoperative  complications techniques. In this letter we want to compare these two techniques and find out the pros and cons of these techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extra-peritoneal vs. Trans-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy pros and cons.\",\"authors\":\"Farzad Allameh, Amir Hossein Eslami\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/uj.v20i.8140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One of the most common cancers of the urinary tract is bladder tumors. Bladder cancers are divided into two groups: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. (1)  Trans-Peritoneal  Radical Cystectomy (RC) with  pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard technique in muscle invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (2). and Urologist around the world are more familiar with trans-peritoneal technique. In some articles extra-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) implied as an decreased  postoperative  complications techniques. In this letter we want to compare these two techniques and find out the pros and cons of these techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.8140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.8140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膀胱肿瘤是泌尿系统最常见的癌症之一。膀胱癌分为两类:非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)和肌肉浸润性膀胱癌。(1)经腹膜根治性膀胱切除术(RC)加盆腔淋巴结切除术是治疗肌肉浸润性和高风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的标准技术(2)。在一些文章中,腹膜外根治性膀胱切除术(RC)被认为是一种可减少术后并发症的技术。在这封信中,我们希望对这两种技术进行比较,找出它们的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extra-peritoneal vs. Trans-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy pros and cons.

One of the most common cancers of the urinary tract is bladder tumors. Bladder cancers are divided into two groups: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. (1)  Trans-Peritoneal  Radical Cystectomy (RC) with  pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard technique in muscle invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (2). and Urologist around the world are more familiar with trans-peritoneal technique. In some articles extra-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) implied as an decreased  postoperative  complications techniques. In this letter we want to compare these two techniques and find out the pros and cons of these techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Complications of Mitrofanoff Continent Urinary Diversion in Adults with Complex Urethral Strictures: A Single-Center Experience. Investigating the Prevalence of Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetic Patients with Urinary Irritation Symptoms Without a Known Cause. Translation and Validation of the Persian Version of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire. Can Radiological Imaging Accurately Predict the Length of the Ureteral Defect/Stricture Following Ureteral Injury? Differentially Expressed Blood ARLNC1 in Combination with PCA3/PSA have Reassuring Clinical Applications in the Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Iranians: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1