年轻男性经尿道前列腺切除术:疗效和长期结果。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-28 DOI:10.5041/RMMJ.10520
Kamil Malshy, Etan Eigner, Anna Ochsner, John Morgan, Ameer Nsair, Borivoj Golijanin, Michael Mullerad
{"title":"年轻男性经尿道前列腺切除术:疗效和长期结果。","authors":"Kamil Malshy, Etan Eigner, Anna Ochsner, John Morgan, Ameer Nsair, Borivoj Golijanin, Michael Mullerad","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the efficacy and outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the context of younger male patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Males aged ≤55 who underwent TURP at Rambam Health Care Campus from January 2011 to August 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicodemographic characteristics, indications for surgery, uroflowmetry, pressure-flow study, and early and late postoperative outcomes were collected. Patients with urethral or bladder abnormalities were excluded. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed for bivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria were met by 58 men who underwent TURP at a median age of 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49.5-54). Median prostate size was 35 mL (24.5-56), with median prostate-specific antigen of 1.4 ng/mL (0.65-3.1). A total of 60% of patients used α-blockers, and 19% used 5α-reductase inhibitors pre-surgery. Overall, 54 (93.1%) had severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with 34 (59%) being predominantly emptying and 20 (35%) storage. Most surgeries were performed for refractory LUTS in 38 (66%), followed by urinary retention in 16 (28%). At 6 weeks, 57 (98%) patients were catheter-free. The maximum flow rate and residual volume showed significant improvement from a median of 6.85 mL/s to 17.9 mL/s (P<0.001), and from 120 mL to 10 mL (P=0.0142), respectively. Pathology revealed benign prostatic hyperplasia in 53 (91.4%), and inflammation in 5 (8.5%). A total of 13 auxiliary procedures were required in 12 patients (20.7%) during follow-up: 7 transurethral bladder neck incisions, 3 re-TURP, 1 meatus widening, and 1 patient required artificial urinary sphincter implantation followed by simple cystectomy for end-stage bladder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In young men, TURP showed short-term gains in flowmetry and catheter removal rates, but a sustained need for subsequent procedures in the long run. In this unique population, patients should be carefully selected, and alternative, less aggressive, interventions should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Younger Men: Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Kamil Malshy, Etan Eigner, Anna Ochsner, John Morgan, Ameer Nsair, Borivoj Golijanin, Michael Mullerad\",\"doi\":\"10.5041/RMMJ.10520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the efficacy and outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the context of younger male patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Males aged ≤55 who underwent TURP at Rambam Health Care Campus from January 2011 to August 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicodemographic characteristics, indications for surgery, uroflowmetry, pressure-flow study, and early and late postoperative outcomes were collected. Patients with urethral or bladder abnormalities were excluded. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed for bivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria were met by 58 men who underwent TURP at a median age of 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49.5-54). Median prostate size was 35 mL (24.5-56), with median prostate-specific antigen of 1.4 ng/mL (0.65-3.1). A total of 60% of patients used α-blockers, and 19% used 5α-reductase inhibitors pre-surgery. Overall, 54 (93.1%) had severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with 34 (59%) being predominantly emptying and 20 (35%) storage. Most surgeries were performed for refractory LUTS in 38 (66%), followed by urinary retention in 16 (28%). At 6 weeks, 57 (98%) patients were catheter-free. The maximum flow rate and residual volume showed significant improvement from a median of 6.85 mL/s to 17.9 mL/s (P<0.001), and from 120 mL to 10 mL (P=0.0142), respectively. Pathology revealed benign prostatic hyperplasia in 53 (91.4%), and inflammation in 5 (8.5%). A total of 13 auxiliary procedures were required in 12 patients (20.7%) during follow-up: 7 transurethral bladder neck incisions, 3 re-TURP, 1 meatus widening, and 1 patient required artificial urinary sphincter implantation followed by simple cystectomy for end-stage bladder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In young men, TURP showed short-term gains in flowmetry and catheter removal rates, but a sustained need for subsequent procedures in the long run. In this unique population, patients should be carefully selected, and alternative, less aggressive, interventions should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在调查年轻男性患者经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的疗效和结果:方法:对 2011 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间在兰巴姆医疗保健园区接受经尿道前列腺电切术的 55 岁以下男性患者进行回顾性研究。收集了临床人口学特征、手术适应症、尿流测定、压力-流量研究以及术后早期和晚期结果。排除了尿道或膀胱异常的患者。采用卡方检验和费雪精确检验进行双变量分析:符合纳入标准的 58 名男性接受了前列腺电切术,他们的中位年龄为 52 岁(四分位距[IQR] 49.5-54)。前列腺大小中位数为 35 毫升(24.5-56),前列腺特异性抗原中位数为 1.4 纳克/毫升(0.65-3.1)。共有60%的患者在手术前使用了α受体阻滞剂,19%的患者使用了5α还原酶抑制剂。总体而言,54 例(93.1%)患者有严重的下尿路症状(LUTS),其中 34 例(59%)以排空症状为主,20 例(35%)以储尿症状为主。大多数手术是针对难治性下尿路症状(LUTS)进行的,38 例(66%),其次是尿潴留,16 例(28%)。6 周后,57 名(98%)患者不再使用导尿管。最大尿流率和残余尿量均有显著改善,从中位数 6.85 毫升/秒提高到 17.9 毫升/秒(PConclusions.TURP):在年轻男性中,TURP 可在短期内提高血流测量和导管移除率,但从长远来看,仍需进行后续手术。在这一特殊人群中,应谨慎选择患者,并考虑采取其他侵袭性较小的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Younger Men: Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the context of younger male patients.

Methods: Males aged ≤55 who underwent TURP at Rambam Health Care Campus from January 2011 to August 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicodemographic characteristics, indications for surgery, uroflowmetry, pressure-flow study, and early and late postoperative outcomes were collected. Patients with urethral or bladder abnormalities were excluded. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed for bivariate analysis.

Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 58 men who underwent TURP at a median age of 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49.5-54). Median prostate size was 35 mL (24.5-56), with median prostate-specific antigen of 1.4 ng/mL (0.65-3.1). A total of 60% of patients used α-blockers, and 19% used 5α-reductase inhibitors pre-surgery. Overall, 54 (93.1%) had severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with 34 (59%) being predominantly emptying and 20 (35%) storage. Most surgeries were performed for refractory LUTS in 38 (66%), followed by urinary retention in 16 (28%). At 6 weeks, 57 (98%) patients were catheter-free. The maximum flow rate and residual volume showed significant improvement from a median of 6.85 mL/s to 17.9 mL/s (P<0.001), and from 120 mL to 10 mL (P=0.0142), respectively. Pathology revealed benign prostatic hyperplasia in 53 (91.4%), and inflammation in 5 (8.5%). A total of 13 auxiliary procedures were required in 12 patients (20.7%) during follow-up: 7 transurethral bladder neck incisions, 3 re-TURP, 1 meatus widening, and 1 patient required artificial urinary sphincter implantation followed by simple cystectomy for end-stage bladder.

Conclusions: In young men, TURP showed short-term gains in flowmetry and catheter removal rates, but a sustained need for subsequent procedures in the long run. In this unique population, patients should be carefully selected, and alternative, less aggressive, interventions should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
IgG4-related Breast Disease: Review of the Literature. Inpatient Rehabilitation is Effective for Severe Daily Activity Deficits Related to Chronic Low Back Pain. Kidnapped But Not Kids: A Case Series of Three Octogenarian Hostages Held in Captivity by Hamas. Myxedema Coma-associated Pancytopenia: A Case Report. The Medical Professional Elimination Program and the Ideology and Motivation of Nazi Physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1