机器人内窥镜经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:单机构病例系列

Q1 Medicine World Neurosurgery: X Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100390
B.F. Saway , C. Cunningham , M. Pereira , M. Sowlat , S.S. Elawady , G. Porto , J. Barley , Nathan Nordmann , B. Frankel
{"title":"机器人内窥镜经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:单机构病例系列","authors":"B.F. Saway ,&nbsp;C. Cunningham ,&nbsp;M. Pereira ,&nbsp;M. Sowlat ,&nbsp;S.S. Elawady ,&nbsp;G. Porto ,&nbsp;J. Barley ,&nbsp;Nathan Nordmann ,&nbsp;B. Frankel","doi":"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Robotic-assisted, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RE-TLIF) is a promising, minimally invasive surgical option for degenerative lumbar spondylosis/spondylolisthesis; however, outcomes data and efficacy are limited, especially in multilevel disease. Here, we present the first reported series of patients that underwent either single or multilevel RE-TLIF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed on 23 consecutive patients who underwent a single level or multilevel RE-TLIF by a single surgeon. Variables included demographics, perioperative results, pain scores, and functional outcome scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen patients (78.3 %) underwent single level RE-TLIF and 5 patients (21.7 %) underwent multilevel RE-TLIF. The median reduction of visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) of all subjects was 6 (IQR = 4.5, 6.5) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (<em>p</em> = 0.565). The median reduction of VAS for leg pain of all subjects 7 (IQR = 6, 8) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (<em>p</em> = 0.702). Median blood loss was 25 cc (IQR = 25, 25) and 50 cc (IQR = 25, 100) for single and multilevel RE-TLIF, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.025), whereas median length of stay was 1 (IQR = 1, 1; mean = 1.0 ± 00.18) days and 1 (IQR = 1, 2; mean = 1.4 ± 00.54) days, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.042). One major complication was observed requiring reoperation for demineralized bone matrix migration resulting in an L5 radiculopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Single and multi-level RE-TLIF appears to be a safe and efficacious approach with comparable outcomes to open and other minimally invasive approaches. Additionally, we observed favorable accuracy in robot-assisted pedicle screw, endoscope, and interbody device placement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37134,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001212/pdfft?md5=b8d8cb156efc605f18100544d9545cc1&pid=1-s2.0-S2590139724001212-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A single institution case series\",\"authors\":\"B.F. Saway ,&nbsp;C. Cunningham ,&nbsp;M. Pereira ,&nbsp;M. Sowlat ,&nbsp;S.S. Elawady ,&nbsp;G. Porto ,&nbsp;J. Barley ,&nbsp;Nathan Nordmann ,&nbsp;B. Frankel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Robotic-assisted, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RE-TLIF) is a promising, minimally invasive surgical option for degenerative lumbar spondylosis/spondylolisthesis; however, outcomes data and efficacy are limited, especially in multilevel disease. Here, we present the first reported series of patients that underwent either single or multilevel RE-TLIF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed on 23 consecutive patients who underwent a single level or multilevel RE-TLIF by a single surgeon. Variables included demographics, perioperative results, pain scores, and functional outcome scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen patients (78.3 %) underwent single level RE-TLIF and 5 patients (21.7 %) underwent multilevel RE-TLIF. The median reduction of visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) of all subjects was 6 (IQR = 4.5, 6.5) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (<em>p</em> = 0.565). The median reduction of VAS for leg pain of all subjects 7 (IQR = 6, 8) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (<em>p</em> = 0.702). Median blood loss was 25 cc (IQR = 25, 25) and 50 cc (IQR = 25, 100) for single and multilevel RE-TLIF, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.025), whereas median length of stay was 1 (IQR = 1, 1; mean = 1.0 ± 00.18) days and 1 (IQR = 1, 2; mean = 1.4 ± 00.54) days, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.042). One major complication was observed requiring reoperation for demineralized bone matrix migration resulting in an L5 radiculopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Single and multi-level RE-TLIF appears to be a safe and efficacious approach with comparable outcomes to open and other minimally invasive approaches. Additionally, we observed favorable accuracy in robot-assisted pedicle screw, endoscope, and interbody device placement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Neurosurgery: X\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001212/pdfft?md5=b8d8cb156efc605f18100544d9545cc1&pid=1-s2.0-S2590139724001212-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Neurosurgery: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景机器人辅助内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术(RE-TLIF)是治疗退行性腰椎病/椎体滑脱症的一种前景广阔的微创手术方案;然而,其结果数据和疗效有限,尤其是在多椎间孔疾病中。在此,我们首次报道了一系列接受单水平或多水平RE-TLIF手术的患者。方法我们对23名连续接受单水平或多水平RE-TLIF手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。结果 18 名患者(78.3%)接受了单水平 RE-TLIF,5 名患者(21.7%)接受了多水平 RE-TLIF。所有受试者腰背痛(LBP)视觉模拟量表(VAS)的中位数为 6(IQR = 4.5,6.5),单层和多层 RE-TLIF 没有显著差异(p = 0.565)。所有受试者的腿部疼痛 VAS 中位值为 7(IQR = 6,8),单层和多层 RE-TLIF 之间无明显差异(p = 0.702)。单层和多层 RE-TLIF 的中位失血量分别为 25 cc(IQR = 25,25)和 50 cc(IQR = 25,100)(p = 0.025),而中位住院时间分别为 1(IQR = 1,1;平均 = 1.0 ± 00.18)天和 1(IQR = 1,2;平均 = 1.4 ± 00.54)天(p = 0.042)。结论单层和多层 RE-TLIF 似乎是一种安全有效的方法,其效果与开放式和其他微创方法相当。此外,我们还观察到机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉、内窥镜和椎间器械置放的准确性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robotic endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A single institution case series

Background

Robotic-assisted, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RE-TLIF) is a promising, minimally invasive surgical option for degenerative lumbar spondylosis/spondylolisthesis; however, outcomes data and efficacy are limited, especially in multilevel disease. Here, we present the first reported series of patients that underwent either single or multilevel RE-TLIF.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on 23 consecutive patients who underwent a single level or multilevel RE-TLIF by a single surgeon. Variables included demographics, perioperative results, pain scores, and functional outcome scores.

Results

Eighteen patients (78.3 %) underwent single level RE-TLIF and 5 patients (21.7 %) underwent multilevel RE-TLIF. The median reduction of visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) of all subjects was 6 (IQR = 4.5, 6.5) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (p = 0.565). The median reduction of VAS for leg pain of all subjects 7 (IQR = 6, 8) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (p = 0.702). Median blood loss was 25 cc (IQR = 25, 25) and 50 cc (IQR = 25, 100) for single and multilevel RE-TLIF, respectively (p = 0.025), whereas median length of stay was 1 (IQR = 1, 1; mean = 1.0 ± 00.18) days and 1 (IQR = 1, 2; mean = 1.4 ± 00.54) days, respectively (p = 0.042). One major complication was observed requiring reoperation for demineralized bone matrix migration resulting in an L5 radiculopathy.

Conclusions

Single and multi-level RE-TLIF appears to be a safe and efficacious approach with comparable outcomes to open and other minimally invasive approaches. Additionally, we observed favorable accuracy in robot-assisted pedicle screw, endoscope, and interbody device placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Neurosurgery: X
World Neurosurgery: X Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
Comparative utility analysis of Chordoma search information between ChatGPT vs. Google Web Letter to the Editor regarding "Using the modified frailty index as a predictor of complications in adults undergoing transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion" Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 16 or more brain metastases: Retrospective single-institution analysis Trends in stroke-related mortality in California hospitals from 2010 to 2020: Have the large core stroke trials made a difference? Impact of body mass index on perioperative complications, radiographic outcomes, and pseudoarthrosis at one year after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1