用于非线性故障检测的可学习快速内核-PCA:基于深度自动编码器的实现

IF 10.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Industrial Information Integration Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100622
Zelin Ren , Yuchen Jiang , Xuebing Yang , Yongqiang Tang , Wensheng Zhang
{"title":"用于非线性故障检测的可学习快速内核-PCA:基于深度自动编码器的实现","authors":"Zelin Ren ,&nbsp;Yuchen Jiang ,&nbsp;Xuebing Yang ,&nbsp;Yongqiang Tang ,&nbsp;Wensheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jii.2024.100622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is a well-recognized nonlinear dimensionality reduction method that has been widely used in nonlinear fault detection tasks. As a kernel trick-based method, KPCA inherits two major problems. First, the form and the parameters of the kernel function are usually selected blindly, depending seriously on trial-and-error. As a result, there may be serious performance degradation in case of inappropriate selections. Second, at the online monitoring stage, KPCA has much computational burden and poor real-time performance, because the kernel method requires to leverage all the offline training data. In this work, to deal with the two drawbacks, a learnable faster realization of the conventional KPCA is proposed. The core idea is to parameterize all feasible kernel functions using the novel nonlinear DAE-FE (deep autoencoder based feature extraction) framework and propose DAE-PCA (deep autoencoder based principal component analysis) approach in detail. The proposed DAE-PCA method is proved to be equivalent to KPCA but has more advantage in terms of automatic searching of the most suitable nonlinear high-dimensional space according to the inputs, which helps to improve the accuracy of fault detection. Furthermore, the online computational efficiency improves by many times compared with the conventional KPCA. Finally, the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process benchmark and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) benchmark are employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, where the average fault detection rates of DAE-PCA are at least 0.27% and 4.69% higher than those of other methods, and its online computational efficiency is faster 90.48% and 24.57% times than that of KPCA respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100622"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learnable faster kernel-PCA for nonlinear fault detection: Deep autoencoder-based realization\",\"authors\":\"Zelin Ren ,&nbsp;Yuchen Jiang ,&nbsp;Xuebing Yang ,&nbsp;Yongqiang Tang ,&nbsp;Wensheng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jii.2024.100622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is a well-recognized nonlinear dimensionality reduction method that has been widely used in nonlinear fault detection tasks. As a kernel trick-based method, KPCA inherits two major problems. First, the form and the parameters of the kernel function are usually selected blindly, depending seriously on trial-and-error. As a result, there may be serious performance degradation in case of inappropriate selections. Second, at the online monitoring stage, KPCA has much computational burden and poor real-time performance, because the kernel method requires to leverage all the offline training data. In this work, to deal with the two drawbacks, a learnable faster realization of the conventional KPCA is proposed. The core idea is to parameterize all feasible kernel functions using the novel nonlinear DAE-FE (deep autoencoder based feature extraction) framework and propose DAE-PCA (deep autoencoder based principal component analysis) approach in detail. The proposed DAE-PCA method is proved to be equivalent to KPCA but has more advantage in terms of automatic searching of the most suitable nonlinear high-dimensional space according to the inputs, which helps to improve the accuracy of fault detection. Furthermore, the online computational efficiency improves by many times compared with the conventional KPCA. Finally, the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process benchmark and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) benchmark are employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, where the average fault detection rates of DAE-PCA are at least 0.27% and 4.69% higher than those of other methods, and its online computational efficiency is faster 90.48% and 24.57% times than that of KPCA respectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Information Integration\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Information Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452414X24000669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452414X24000669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核主成分分析(KPCA)是一种公认的非线性降维方法,已被广泛应用于非线性故障检测任务中。作为一种基于核技巧的方法,KPCA 继承了两个主要问题。首先,核函数的形式和参数通常是盲目选择的,严重依赖于试错。因此,如果选择不当,可能会导致性能严重下降。其次,在在线监测阶段,由于核方法需要利用所有离线训练数据,KPCA 的计算量很大,实时性较差。针对这两个缺点,本文提出了一种传统 KPCA 的可学习快速实现方法。其核心思想是利用新颖的非线性 DAE-FE(基于深度自动编码器的特征提取)框架对所有可行的核函数进行参数化,并详细提出了 DAE-PCA(基于深度自动编码器的主成分分析)方法。事实证明,所提出的 DAE-PCA 方法等同于 KPCA,但在根据输入自动搜索最合适的非线性高维空间方面更具优势,有助于提高故障检测的准确性。此外,与传统的 KPCA 相比,在线计算效率提高了许多倍。最后,利用田纳西伊士曼(Tennessee Eastman,TE)工艺基准和污水处理厂(WWTP)基准说明了所提方法的有效性,其中 DAE-PCA 的平均故障检测率比其他方法至少高出 0.27% 和 4.69%,其在线计算效率分别比 KPCA 快 90.48% 和 24.57%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learnable faster kernel-PCA for nonlinear fault detection: Deep autoencoder-based realization

Kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is a well-recognized nonlinear dimensionality reduction method that has been widely used in nonlinear fault detection tasks. As a kernel trick-based method, KPCA inherits two major problems. First, the form and the parameters of the kernel function are usually selected blindly, depending seriously on trial-and-error. As a result, there may be serious performance degradation in case of inappropriate selections. Second, at the online monitoring stage, KPCA has much computational burden and poor real-time performance, because the kernel method requires to leverage all the offline training data. In this work, to deal with the two drawbacks, a learnable faster realization of the conventional KPCA is proposed. The core idea is to parameterize all feasible kernel functions using the novel nonlinear DAE-FE (deep autoencoder based feature extraction) framework and propose DAE-PCA (deep autoencoder based principal component analysis) approach in detail. The proposed DAE-PCA method is proved to be equivalent to KPCA but has more advantage in terms of automatic searching of the most suitable nonlinear high-dimensional space according to the inputs, which helps to improve the accuracy of fault detection. Furthermore, the online computational efficiency improves by many times compared with the conventional KPCA. Finally, the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process benchmark and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) benchmark are employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, where the average fault detection rates of DAE-PCA are at least 0.27% and 4.69% higher than those of other methods, and its online computational efficiency is faster 90.48% and 24.57% times than that of KPCA respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Information Integration
Journal of Industrial Information Integration Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
13.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Information Integration focuses on the industry's transition towards industrial integration and informatization, covering not only hardware and software but also information integration. It serves as a platform for promoting advances in industrial information integration, addressing challenges, issues, and solutions in an interdisciplinary forum for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. The Journal of Industrial Information Integration welcomes papers on foundational, technical, and practical aspects of industrial information integration, emphasizing the complex and cross-disciplinary topics that arise in industrial integration. Techniques from mathematical science, computer science, computer engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, manufacturing engineering, and engineering management are crucial in this context.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing mixed gas discrimination in e-nose system: Sparse recurrent neural networks using transient current fluctuation of SMO array sensor An effective farmer-centred mobile intelligence solution using lightweight deep learning for integrated wheat pest management TRIPLE: A blockchain-based digital twin framework for cyber–physical systems security Industrial information integration in deep space exploration and exploitation: Architecture and technology Interoperability levels and challenges of digital twins in cyber–physical systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1