新型全 3D 打印模拟腰椎运动节段的设计改进与验证

IF 4.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Bionic Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1007/s42235-024-00512-8
Siril Teja Dukkipati, Mark Driscoll
{"title":"新型全 3D 打印模拟腰椎运动节段的设计改进与验证","authors":"Siril Teja Dukkipati,&nbsp;Mark Driscoll","doi":"10.1007/s42235-024-00512-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spine biomechanical testing methods in the past few decades have not evolved beyond employing either cadaveric studies or finite element modeling techniques. However, both these approaches may have inherent cost and time limitations. Cadaveric studies are the present gold standard for spinal implant design and regulatory approval, but they introduce significant variability in measurements across patients, often requiring large sample sizes. Finite element modeling demands considerable expertise and can be computationally expensive when complex geometry and material nonlinearity are introduced. Validated analogue spine models could complement these traditional methods as a low-cost and high-fidelity alternative. A fully 3D printable L-S1 analogue spine model with ligaments is developed and validated in this research. Rotational stiffness of the model under pure bending loading in flexion-extension, Lateral Bending (LB) and Axial Rotation (AR) is evaluated and compared against historical ex vivo and in silico models. Additionally, the effect of interspinous, intertransverse ligaments and the Thoracolumbar Fascia (TLF) on spinal stiffness is evaluated by systematic construction of the model. In flexion, model Range of Motion (ROM) was 12.92 ± 0.11° (ex vivo: 16.58°, in silico: 12.96°) at 7.5Nm. In LB, average ROM was 13.67 ± 0.12° at 7.5 Nm (ex vivo: 15.21 ± 1.89°, in silico: 15.49 ± 0.23°). Similarly, in AR, average ROM was 17.69 ± 2.12° at 7.5Nm (ex vivo: 14.12 ± 0.31°, in silico: 15.91 ± 0.28°). The addition of interspinous and intertransverse ligaments increased both flexion and LB stiffnesses by approximately 5%. Addition of TLF showed increase in flexion and AR stiffnesses by 29% and 24%, respectively. This novel model can reproduce physiological ROMs with high repeatability and could be a useful open-source tool in spine biomechanics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","volume":"21 3","pages":"1388 - 1396"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Improvements and Validation of a Novel Fully 3D Printed Analogue Lumbar Spine Motion Segment\",\"authors\":\"Siril Teja Dukkipati,&nbsp;Mark Driscoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42235-024-00512-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Spine biomechanical testing methods in the past few decades have not evolved beyond employing either cadaveric studies or finite element modeling techniques. However, both these approaches may have inherent cost and time limitations. Cadaveric studies are the present gold standard for spinal implant design and regulatory approval, but they introduce significant variability in measurements across patients, often requiring large sample sizes. Finite element modeling demands considerable expertise and can be computationally expensive when complex geometry and material nonlinearity are introduced. Validated analogue spine models could complement these traditional methods as a low-cost and high-fidelity alternative. A fully 3D printable L-S1 analogue spine model with ligaments is developed and validated in this research. Rotational stiffness of the model under pure bending loading in flexion-extension, Lateral Bending (LB) and Axial Rotation (AR) is evaluated and compared against historical ex vivo and in silico models. Additionally, the effect of interspinous, intertransverse ligaments and the Thoracolumbar Fascia (TLF) on spinal stiffness is evaluated by systematic construction of the model. In flexion, model Range of Motion (ROM) was 12.92 ± 0.11° (ex vivo: 16.58°, in silico: 12.96°) at 7.5Nm. In LB, average ROM was 13.67 ± 0.12° at 7.5 Nm (ex vivo: 15.21 ± 1.89°, in silico: 15.49 ± 0.23°). Similarly, in AR, average ROM was 17.69 ± 2.12° at 7.5Nm (ex vivo: 14.12 ± 0.31°, in silico: 15.91 ± 0.28°). The addition of interspinous and intertransverse ligaments increased both flexion and LB stiffnesses by approximately 5%. Addition of TLF showed increase in flexion and AR stiffnesses by 29% and 24%, respectively. This novel model can reproduce physiological ROMs with high repeatability and could be a useful open-source tool in spine biomechanics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bionic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"1388 - 1396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bionic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-024-00512-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-024-00512-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几十年中,脊柱生物力学测试方法的发展并没有超越尸体研究或有限元建模技术。然而,这两种方法都可能存在固有的成本和时间限制。尸体研究是目前脊柱植入物设计和监管审批的黄金标准,但会导致不同患者的测量结果存在显著差异,通常需要较大的样本量。有限元建模需要大量的专业知识,而且当引入复杂的几何形状和材料非线性时,计算成本会很高。经过验证的模拟脊柱模型作为一种低成本、高保真的替代方法,可以补充这些传统方法的不足。本研究开发并验证了带有韧带的全三维打印 L-S1 模拟脊柱模型。该模型在屈伸、侧弯(LB)和轴向旋转(AR)的纯弯曲负荷下的旋转刚度得到了评估,并与历史上的体外模型和硅模型进行了比较。此外,还通过系统构建模型评估了棘间韧带、横韧带和胸腰椎筋膜(TLF)对脊柱刚度的影响。在屈曲时,7.5 牛米的模型运动范围(ROM)为 12.92 ± 0.11°(体外:16.58°,硅学:12.96°)。在 LB 中,7.5 牛米时的平均 ROM 为 13.67 ± 0.12°(体外:15.21 ± 1.89°,硅学:15.49 ± 0.23°)。同样,在 AR 中,7.5 牛米时的平均 ROM 为 17.69 ± 2.12°(体外:14.12 ± 0.31°,硅学:15.91 ± 0.28°)。加入棘间韧带和横韧带后,屈曲刚度和浐灞刚度都增加了约 5%。加入 TLF 后,屈曲和 AR 硬度分别增加了 29% 和 24%。这种新型模型能以较高的可重复性再现生理ROM,可作为脊柱生物力学的有用开源工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design Improvements and Validation of a Novel Fully 3D Printed Analogue Lumbar Spine Motion Segment

Spine biomechanical testing methods in the past few decades have not evolved beyond employing either cadaveric studies or finite element modeling techniques. However, both these approaches may have inherent cost and time limitations. Cadaveric studies are the present gold standard for spinal implant design and regulatory approval, but they introduce significant variability in measurements across patients, often requiring large sample sizes. Finite element modeling demands considerable expertise and can be computationally expensive when complex geometry and material nonlinearity are introduced. Validated analogue spine models could complement these traditional methods as a low-cost and high-fidelity alternative. A fully 3D printable L-S1 analogue spine model with ligaments is developed and validated in this research. Rotational stiffness of the model under pure bending loading in flexion-extension, Lateral Bending (LB) and Axial Rotation (AR) is evaluated and compared against historical ex vivo and in silico models. Additionally, the effect of interspinous, intertransverse ligaments and the Thoracolumbar Fascia (TLF) on spinal stiffness is evaluated by systematic construction of the model. In flexion, model Range of Motion (ROM) was 12.92 ± 0.11° (ex vivo: 16.58°, in silico: 12.96°) at 7.5Nm. In LB, average ROM was 13.67 ± 0.12° at 7.5 Nm (ex vivo: 15.21 ± 1.89°, in silico: 15.49 ± 0.23°). Similarly, in AR, average ROM was 17.69 ± 2.12° at 7.5Nm (ex vivo: 14.12 ± 0.31°, in silico: 15.91 ± 0.28°). The addition of interspinous and intertransverse ligaments increased both flexion and LB stiffnesses by approximately 5%. Addition of TLF showed increase in flexion and AR stiffnesses by 29% and 24%, respectively. This novel model can reproduce physiological ROMs with high repeatability and could be a useful open-source tool in spine biomechanics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bionic Engineering
Journal of Bionic Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
162
审稿时长
10.0 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bionic Engineering (JBE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers and reviews that apply the knowledge learned from nature and biological systems to solve concrete engineering problems. The topics that JBE covers include but are not limited to: Mechanisms, kinematical mechanics and control of animal locomotion, development of mobile robots with walking (running and crawling), swimming or flying abilities inspired by animal locomotion. Structures, morphologies, composition and physical properties of natural and biomaterials; fabrication of new materials mimicking the properties and functions of natural and biomaterials. Biomedical materials, artificial organs and tissue engineering for medical applications; rehabilitation equipment and devices. Development of bioinspired computation methods and artificial intelligence for engineering applications.
期刊最新文献
Sandwich-Structured Solar Cells with Accelerated Conversion Efficiency by Self-Cooling and Self-Cleaning Design From Perception to Action: Brain-to-Brain Information Transmission of Pigeons Design and Motion Characteristics of a Ray-Inspired Micro-Robot Made of Magnetic Film Bionic Jumping of Humanoid Robot via Online Centroid Trajectory Optimization and High Dynamic Motion Controller Multi-Sensor Fusion for State Estimation and Control of Cable-Driven Soft Robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1