评估不同环境下的生产计划和控制系统:模拟比较研究

Wolfgang Seiringer, Balwin Bokor, Klaus Altendorfer
{"title":"评估不同环境下的生产计划和控制系统:模拟比较研究","authors":"Wolfgang Seiringer, Balwin Bokor, Klaus Altendorfer","doi":"arxiv-2405.02015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting the appropriate production planning and control systems (PPCS)\npresents a significant challenge for many companies, as their performance, i.e.\noverall costs, depends on the production system environment. Key environmental\ncharacteristics include the system's structure, i.e. flow shop, hybrid shop, or\njob shop, and the planned shop load. Besides selecting a suitable PPCS, its\nparameterization significantly influences the performance. This publication\ninvestigates the performance and the optimal parametrization of Material\nRequirement Planning (MRP), Reorder Point System (RPS) and Constant Work In\nProgress (ConWIP) at different stochastic multi-item multi-stage production\nsystem environments by conduction a comprehensive full factorial simulation\nstudy. The results indicate that MRP and ConWIP generally outperform RPS in all\nobserved environments. Moreover, when comparing MRP with ConWIP, the\nperformance clearly varies depending on the specific production system\nenvironment.","PeriodicalId":501487,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Seiringer, Balwin Bokor, Klaus Altendorfer\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.02015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Selecting the appropriate production planning and control systems (PPCS)\\npresents a significant challenge for many companies, as their performance, i.e.\\noverall costs, depends on the production system environment. Key environmental\\ncharacteristics include the system's structure, i.e. flow shop, hybrid shop, or\\njob shop, and the planned shop load. Besides selecting a suitable PPCS, its\\nparameterization significantly influences the performance. This publication\\ninvestigates the performance and the optimal parametrization of Material\\nRequirement Planning (MRP), Reorder Point System (RPS) and Constant Work In\\nProgress (ConWIP) at different stochastic multi-item multi-stage production\\nsystem environments by conduction a comprehensive full factorial simulation\\nstudy. The results indicate that MRP and ConWIP generally outperform RPS in all\\nobserved environments. Moreover, when comparing MRP with ConWIP, the\\nperformance clearly varies depending on the specific production system\\nenvironment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.02015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.02015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择合适的生产计划和控制系统(PPCS)对许多公司来说都是一项重大挑战,因为其性能(即总体成本)取决于生产系统的环境。关键的环境特征包括系统结构,即流动车间、混合车间或作业车间,以及计划车间负荷。除了选择合适的 PPCS 外,其参数化对性能也有很大影响。本文通过全面的全因子仿真研究,探讨了在不同的随机多项目多阶段生产系统环境下,物料需求计划(MRP)、重订点系统(RPS)和在制品恒定(ConWIP)的性能和最优参数化。结果表明,在所有观测环境下,MRP 和 ConWIP 的性能普遍优于 RPS。此外,在对 MRP 和 ConWIP 进行比较时,其性能明显因具体的生产系统环境而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study
Selecting the appropriate production planning and control systems (PPCS) presents a significant challenge for many companies, as their performance, i.e. overall costs, depends on the production system environment. Key environmental characteristics include the system's structure, i.e. flow shop, hybrid shop, or job shop, and the planned shop load. Besides selecting a suitable PPCS, its parameterization significantly influences the performance. This publication investigates the performance and the optimal parametrization of Material Requirement Planning (MRP), Reorder Point System (RPS) and Constant Work In Progress (ConWIP) at different stochastic multi-item multi-stage production system environments by conduction a comprehensive full factorial simulation study. The results indicate that MRP and ConWIP generally outperform RPS in all observed environments. Moreover, when comparing MRP with ConWIP, the performance clearly varies depending on the specific production system environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty of Supply Chains: Risk and Ambiguity Crypto Market Analysis & Real-Estate Business Protocol Proposal | Application of Ethereum Blockchain Monetary Policies on Green Financial Markets: Evidence from a Multi-Moment Connectedness Network Simulating the economic impact of rationality through reinforcement learning and agent-based modelling The Economy and Public Diplomacy: An Analysis of RT's Economic Content and Context on Facebook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1