塞瓦斯托波尔的地下战争(1854-1855 年):法国和俄罗斯地雷系统之间的斗争

IF 0.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1134/s101933162309006x
S. S. Kurochkin
{"title":"塞瓦斯托波尔的地下战争(1854-1855 年):法国和俄罗斯地雷系统之间的斗争","authors":"S. S. Kurochkin","doi":"10.1134/s101933162309006x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The course of the struggle between Russian and French sappers in Sevastopol during the Crimean War (1853–1856) is analyzed, and the plans adopted during the fighting for waging an underground war on the part of both besiegers and defenders are studied. The purpose of this article is to study the tactics chosen by Russian and French military engineers to achieve their goals during the siege of Sevastopol (1854–1855), to analyze the general results of their confrontation, and to clarify the influence of the underground war on the general course of the siege of the fortress city and on the further development of military engineering science. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the records of both sides (Russian and French combat logs) to identify what information about the enemy the besiegers and the defenders had at various stages of the siege and from what premises they proceeded when making certain decisions in planning their underground work. Both tactical and technical aspects of the confrontation between Russian and French miners are examined, and organizational factors in the construction of countermine systems in front of Russian fortifications are identified that allowed Russian miners to effectively contain French underground work until the end of the siege of the city. It is demonstrated that due to more advanced underground warfare tactics, Russian military engineers, despite the limited technical means available (especially at the initial stages of countermine construction), managed to achieve superiority over the enemy, preventing French sappers from damaging the fortifications of the defensive line on the southern side of Sevastopol.</p>","PeriodicalId":56335,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underground Warfare in Sevastopol (1854–1855): The Struggle between French and Russian Mine Systems\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Kurochkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s101933162309006x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>The course of the struggle between Russian and French sappers in Sevastopol during the Crimean War (1853–1856) is analyzed, and the plans adopted during the fighting for waging an underground war on the part of both besiegers and defenders are studied. The purpose of this article is to study the tactics chosen by Russian and French military engineers to achieve their goals during the siege of Sevastopol (1854–1855), to analyze the general results of their confrontation, and to clarify the influence of the underground war on the general course of the siege of the fortress city and on the further development of military engineering science. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the records of both sides (Russian and French combat logs) to identify what information about the enemy the besiegers and the defenders had at various stages of the siege and from what premises they proceeded when making certain decisions in planning their underground work. Both tactical and technical aspects of the confrontation between Russian and French miners are examined, and organizational factors in the construction of countermine systems in front of Russian fortifications are identified that allowed Russian miners to effectively contain French underground work until the end of the siege of the city. It is demonstrated that due to more advanced underground warfare tactics, Russian military engineers, despite the limited technical means available (especially at the initial stages of countermine construction), managed to achieve superiority over the enemy, preventing French sappers from damaging the fortifications of the defensive line on the southern side of Sevastopol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s101933162309006x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s101933162309006x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 分析了克里米亚战争(1853-1856 年)期间塞瓦斯托波尔俄法工兵之间的斗争过程,研究了战斗期间围攻者和防御者为发动地下战争而采取的计划。本文旨在研究俄罗斯和法国工兵在围攻塞瓦斯托波尔(1854-1855 年)期间为实现其目标而选择的战术,分析双方对抗的总体结果,并阐明地下战争对围攻要塞城市的总体进程和军事工程科学的进一步发展所产生的影响。该书特别注重分析双方的记录(俄国和法国的战斗日志),以确定围攻者和守卫者在围攻的各个阶段掌握了哪些关于敌人的信息,以及他们在规划地下工程时从哪些前提出发做出了某些决定。研究了俄罗斯和法国矿工之间对抗的战术和技术方面,并确定了在俄罗斯工事前建造反地雷系统的组织因素,这些因素使俄罗斯矿工能够有效遏制法国的地下工作,直到围城结束。研究表明,由于采用了更先进的地下战战术,俄罗斯工兵尽管技术手段有限(尤其是在反地雷建造的初始阶段),但仍成功地取得了对敌人的优势,阻止了法国工兵对塞瓦斯托波尔南侧防线工事的破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Underground Warfare in Sevastopol (1854–1855): The Struggle between French and Russian Mine Systems

Abstract

The course of the struggle between Russian and French sappers in Sevastopol during the Crimean War (1853–1856) is analyzed, and the plans adopted during the fighting for waging an underground war on the part of both besiegers and defenders are studied. The purpose of this article is to study the tactics chosen by Russian and French military engineers to achieve their goals during the siege of Sevastopol (1854–1855), to analyze the general results of their confrontation, and to clarify the influence of the underground war on the general course of the siege of the fortress city and on the further development of military engineering science. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the records of both sides (Russian and French combat logs) to identify what information about the enemy the besiegers and the defenders had at various stages of the siege and from what premises they proceeded when making certain decisions in planning their underground work. Both tactical and technical aspects of the confrontation between Russian and French miners are examined, and organizational factors in the construction of countermine systems in front of Russian fortifications are identified that allowed Russian miners to effectively contain French underground work until the end of the siege of the city. It is demonstrated that due to more advanced underground warfare tactics, Russian military engineers, despite the limited technical means available (especially at the initial stages of countermine construction), managed to achieve superiority over the enemy, preventing French sappers from damaging the fortifications of the defensive line on the southern side of Sevastopol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences provides a broad coverage of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ activities. It publishes original works, surveys, speeches, and discussions with participation of the members of Russian Academy of Sciences, leading scientists in Russia and worldwide and presents various viewpoints on important subjects related to all fields of science. The journal addresses the questions of scientist’s role in society and the role of scientific knowledge in the modern world.
期刊最新文献
The “Nuclear Winter” Hypothesis and a Responsible Nuclear Policy Medical Services of Russia, France, and Britain in the Crimean War, 1853–1856 The Topical Past: Instrumentalization of the Historical Memory of 1812 during the Crimean War of 1853–1856 B.N. Chicherin: The Crimean War as a Reflection of the Crisis of the Russian Empire The Crimean War and the Kingdom of Sardinia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1