LGBTQ+ 人士对与外群体成员互动的看法:对社会工作教育和实践的影响

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Social Work Research Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1093/swr/svae008
Morgan E Braganza, David R Hodge
{"title":"LGBTQ+ 人士对与外群体成员互动的看法:对社会工作教育和实践的影响","authors":"Morgan E Braganza, David R Hodge","doi":"10.1093/swr/svae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engaging respectfully with individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, genderqueer, or gender-nonconforming (LGBTQ+) is an ethical imperative. To help social workers fulfill this obligation, this study explored the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ people regarding their interactions with people outside the LGBTQ+ community, and what LGBTQ+ people desire for future interactions. Narrative interviews were conducted with 11 LGBTQ+ social work graduate students and alumni to explore (a) their self-reported experiences engaging in one-on-one and small group interactions with outgroup members throughout their lives and (b) the meaning they gleaned from their life experiences across various domains (e.g., work, family, education) that might improve future interactions. Analysis produced six storylines that can be summarized as (1) unbalanced depictions of difference, (2) avoiding interactions, (3) managing positive treatment of an identity, (4) restricting certain perspectives, (5) focusing on differences, and (6) the importance of seeing humanity. The findings suggest several strategies for interacting with LGBTQ+ people in a more culturally sensitive way including discussing the LGBTQ+ community in a nuanced manner (as opposed to monolithically) and considering the level of attention paid to individuals’ sexual orientation and gender identity.","PeriodicalId":47282,"journal":{"name":"Social Work Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LGBTQ+ People’s Perceptions of Interactions with Outgroup Members: Implications for Social Work Education and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Morgan E Braganza, David R Hodge\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/swr/svae008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Engaging respectfully with individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, genderqueer, or gender-nonconforming (LGBTQ+) is an ethical imperative. To help social workers fulfill this obligation, this study explored the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ people regarding their interactions with people outside the LGBTQ+ community, and what LGBTQ+ people desire for future interactions. Narrative interviews were conducted with 11 LGBTQ+ social work graduate students and alumni to explore (a) their self-reported experiences engaging in one-on-one and small group interactions with outgroup members throughout their lives and (b) the meaning they gleaned from their life experiences across various domains (e.g., work, family, education) that might improve future interactions. Analysis produced six storylines that can be summarized as (1) unbalanced depictions of difference, (2) avoiding interactions, (3) managing positive treatment of an identity, (4) restricting certain perspectives, (5) focusing on differences, and (6) the importance of seeing humanity. The findings suggest several strategies for interacting with LGBTQ+ people in a more culturally sensitive way including discussing the LGBTQ+ community in a nuanced manner (as opposed to monolithically) and considering the level of attention paid to individuals’ sexual orientation and gender identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work Research\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svae008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svae008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以尊重的态度与被认定为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者、变性人或性别不符合者(LGBTQ+)的人交往是一项道德义务。为了帮助社会工作者履行这一义务,本研究探讨了 LGBTQ+ 与 LGBTQ+ 社区以外的人交往时的生活经历,以及 LGBTQ+ 对未来交往的期望。研究人员对 11 名 LGBTQ+ 社会工作专业的研究生和校友进行了叙事性访谈,以探究:(a)他们自我报告的一生中与外部群体成员进行一对一和小组互动的经历;(b)他们从不同领域(如工作、家庭、教育)的生活经历中获得的可能改善未来互动的意义。分析得出了六个故事情节,可以概括为:(1)对差异的不平衡描述;(2)避免互动;(3)管理对某种身份的积极对待;(4)限制某些观点;(5)关注差异;以及(6)看到人性的重要性。研究结果提出了几种以更具文化敏感性的方式与 LGBTQ+ 互动的策略,包括以细微的方式(而不是单一的方式)讨论 LGBTQ+ 群体,以及考虑对个人性取向和性别认同的关注程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LGBTQ+ People’s Perceptions of Interactions with Outgroup Members: Implications for Social Work Education and Practice
Engaging respectfully with individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, genderqueer, or gender-nonconforming (LGBTQ+) is an ethical imperative. To help social workers fulfill this obligation, this study explored the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ people regarding their interactions with people outside the LGBTQ+ community, and what LGBTQ+ people desire for future interactions. Narrative interviews were conducted with 11 LGBTQ+ social work graduate students and alumni to explore (a) their self-reported experiences engaging in one-on-one and small group interactions with outgroup members throughout their lives and (b) the meaning they gleaned from their life experiences across various domains (e.g., work, family, education) that might improve future interactions. Analysis produced six storylines that can be summarized as (1) unbalanced depictions of difference, (2) avoiding interactions, (3) managing positive treatment of an identity, (4) restricting certain perspectives, (5) focusing on differences, and (6) the importance of seeing humanity. The findings suggest several strategies for interacting with LGBTQ+ people in a more culturally sensitive way including discussing the LGBTQ+ community in a nuanced manner (as opposed to monolithically) and considering the level of attention paid to individuals’ sexual orientation and gender identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work Research
Social Work Research SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Social work research addresses psychosocial problems, preventive interventions, treatment of acute and chronic conditions, and community, organizational, policy and administrative issues. Covering the lifespan, social work research may address clinical, services and policy issues. It benefits consumers, practitioners, policy-makers, educators, and the general public by: •Examining prevention and intervention strategies for health and mental health, child welfare, aging, substance abuse, community development, managed care, housing, economic self-sufficiency, family well-being, etc.; Studying the strengths, needs, and inter-relationships of individuals, families, groups, neighborhoods, and social institutions;
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of South Asian Youth in the United States about Gender Norms and Healthcare Decision Making LGBTQ+ People’s Perceptions of Interactions with Outgroup Members: Implications for Social Work Education and Practice “The Air Is Being Sucked Out of the Room”: Experiences of Social Work Students of Color with Antiracism Education in the Classroom and Practicum Environmental Sensitivity Scale for Social Workers: A Scale Development Study A Qualitative Exploration of Social Workers’ Job Preparedness in Law Enforcement Agencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1