保持简单

IF 0.9 1区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Natural Language Semantics Pub Date : 2018-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s11050-018-9143-5

Tue Trinh

{"title":"保持简单","authors":"Tue Trinh","doi":"10.1007/s11050-018-9143-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breheny et al. (Nat Lang Semant, 2017) argue against the structural approach to alternatives. The empirical force of their argument comes mostly from challenges raised against Trinh and Haida (Nat Lang Semant 23:249–270, 2015). This paper aims to respond to these challenges, showing how they can be met by a natural refinement of Trinh and Haida’s proposal which turns out to capture additional facts previously not accounted for. Another aim of this paper is to recount the debate with enough precision and explicitness in order to enhance understanding and facilitate future discussions.","PeriodicalId":47108,"journal":{"name":"Natural Language Semantics","volume":"284 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keeping it simple\",\"authors\":\"Tue Trinh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11050-018-9143-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Breheny et al. (Nat Lang Semant, 2017) argue against the structural approach to alternatives. The empirical force of their argument comes mostly from challenges raised against Trinh and Haida (Nat Lang Semant 23:249–270, 2015). This paper aims to respond to these challenges, showing how they can be met by a natural refinement of Trinh and Haida’s proposal which turns out to capture additional facts previously not accounted for. Another aim of this paper is to recount the debate with enough precision and explicitness in order to enhance understanding and facilitate future discussions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Language Semantics\",\"volume\":\"284 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Language Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-018-9143-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Language Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-018-9143-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Breheny 等人（Nat Lang Semant，2017 年）反对替代品的结构性方法。他们论证的实证力量主要来自对 Trinh 和 Haida 提出的挑战（Nat Lang Semant 23:249-270, 2015）。本文旨在回应这些挑战，展示如何通过对 Trinh 和 Haida 提议的自然完善来应对这些挑战，结果发现该提议捕捉到了之前未考虑到的更多事实。本文的另一个目的是以足够精确和明确的方式重述这场辩论，以加深理解并促进未来的讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Keeping it simple

Breheny et al. (Nat Lang Semant, 2017) argue against the structural approach to alternatives. The empirical force of their argument comes mostly from challenges raised against Trinh and Haida (Nat Lang Semant 23:249–270, 2015). This paper aims to respond to these challenges, showing how they can be met by a natural refinement of Trinh and Haida’s proposal which turns out to capture additional facts previously not accounted for. Another aim of this paper is to recount the debate with enough precision and explicitness in order to enhance understanding and facilitate future discussions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Natural Language Semantics Multiple-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

27.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Natural Language Semantics is devoted to semantics and its interfaces in grammar, especially syntax. The journal seeks to encourage the convergence of approaches employing the concepts of logic and philosophy with perspectives of generative grammar on the relations between meaning and structure. Natural Language Semantics publishes studies focused on linguistic phenomena as opposed to those dealing primarily with the field''s methodological and formal foundations. Representative topics include, but are not limited to, quantification, negation, modality, genericity, tense, aspect, aktionsarten, focus, presuppositions, anaphora, definiteness, plurals, mass nouns, adjectives, adverbial modification, nominalization, ellipsis, and interrogatives. The journal features mainly research articles, but also short squibs as well as remarks on and replies to pertinent books and articles.The journal has an Editorial Assistant, Christine Bartels, a copy editor with a PhD in linguistics who personally shepherds accepted manuscripts through the production process.Since 2009 this journal is covered by ISI/Social Sciences Citation Index.Springer fully understands that access to your work is important to you and to the sponsors of your research. We are listed as a green publisher in the SHERPA/RoMEO database, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights. Read more about author''s rights on: http://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/authors-rights

期刊最新文献

Copular asymmetries in belief reports Mental states via possessive predication: the grammar of possessive experiencer complex predicates in Persian Eventive modal projection: the case of Spanish subjunctive relative clauses Force shift: a case study of Cantonese ho2 particle clusters Direct evidentiality and discourse in Southern Aymara