德国蟑螂皮下免疫疗法儿科随机对照试验。

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.022
{"title":"德国蟑螂皮下免疫疗法儿科随机对照试验。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cockroach allergy contributes to morbidity among urban children with asthma. Few trials address the effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with cockroach allergen among these at-risk children.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We sought to determine whether nasal allergen challenge (NAC) responses to cockroach allergen would improve following 1 year of SCIT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Urban children with asthma, who were cockroach-sensitized and reactive on NAC, participated in a year-long randomized double-blind placebo-controlled SCIT trial using German cockroach extract. The primary endpoint was the change in mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) during NAC after 12 months of SCIT. Changes in nasal </span>transcriptomic<span> responses during NAC, skin prick test wheal<span> size, serum allergen-specific antibody production, and T-cell responses to cockroach allergen were assessed.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Changes in mean NAC TNSS did not differ between SCIT-assigned (n = 28) versus placebo-assigned (n = 29) participants (<em>P</em><span> = .63). Nasal transcriptomic<span> responses correlated with TNSS, but a treatment effect was not observed. Cockroach serum-specific IgE decreased to a similar extent in both groups, while decreased cockroach skin prick test wheal size was greater among SCIT participants (</span></span><em>P</em> = .04). A 200-fold increase in cockroach serum-specific IgG<sub>4</sub> was observed among subjects receiving SCIT (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) but was unchanged in the placebo group. T-cell IL-4 responses following cockroach allergen stimulation decreased to a greater extent among SCIT versus placebo (<em>P</em> = .002), while no effect was observed for IL-10 or IFN-γ.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>A year of SCIT failed to alter NAC TNSS and nasal transcriptome responses to cockroach allergen challenge despite systemic effects on allergen-specific skin tests, induction of serum-specific IgG</span><sub>4</sub> serum production and down-modulation of allergen-stimulated T-cell responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pediatric randomized, controlled trial of German cockroach subcutaneous immunotherapy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cockroach allergy contributes to morbidity among urban children with asthma. Few trials address the effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with cockroach allergen among these at-risk children.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We sought to determine whether nasal allergen challenge (NAC) responses to cockroach allergen would improve following 1 year of SCIT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Urban children with asthma, who were cockroach-sensitized and reactive on NAC, participated in a year-long randomized double-blind placebo-controlled SCIT trial using German cockroach extract. The primary endpoint was the change in mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) during NAC after 12 months of SCIT. Changes in nasal </span>transcriptomic<span> responses during NAC, skin prick test wheal<span> size, serum allergen-specific antibody production, and T-cell responses to cockroach allergen were assessed.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Changes in mean NAC TNSS did not differ between SCIT-assigned (n = 28) versus placebo-assigned (n = 29) participants (<em>P</em><span> = .63). Nasal transcriptomic<span> responses correlated with TNSS, but a treatment effect was not observed. Cockroach serum-specific IgE decreased to a similar extent in both groups, while decreased cockroach skin prick test wheal size was greater among SCIT participants (</span></span><em>P</em> = .04). A 200-fold increase in cockroach serum-specific IgG<sub>4</sub> was observed among subjects receiving SCIT (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) but was unchanged in the placebo group. T-cell IL-4 responses following cockroach allergen stimulation decreased to a greater extent among SCIT versus placebo (<em>P</em> = .002), while no effect was observed for IL-10 or IFN-γ.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>A year of SCIT failed to alter NAC TNSS and nasal transcriptome responses to cockroach allergen challenge despite systemic effects on allergen-specific skin tests, induction of serum-specific IgG</span><sub>4</sub> serum production and down-modulation of allergen-stimulated T-cell responses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009167492400455X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009167492400455X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蟑螂过敏是导致城市哮喘儿童发病的主要原因。很少有试验研究蟑螂过敏原皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)对这些高危儿童的影响:目的:确定鼻过敏原挑战(NAC)对蟑螂过敏原的反应在接受 SCIT 一年后是否会有所改善:方法:对蟑螂过敏且对 NAC 有反应的城市哮喘儿童参加了为期一年的随机双盲安慰剂对照 SCIT 试验,试验中使用了德国蟑螂提取物。主要终点是接受 12 个月 SCIT 后,在 NAC 期间鼻腔症状总评分 (TNSS) 平均值的变化。此外,还评估了NAC期间鼻腔转录组反应的变化、皮肤点刺试验(SPT)血疱大小、血清过敏原特异性抗体的产生以及T细胞对蟑螂过敏原的反应:结果:SCIT分配的参与者(28人)与安慰剂分配的参与者(29人)的平均NAC TNSS变化没有差异(P=0.63)。鼻腔转录组反应与 TNSS 相关,但未观察到治疗效果。两组患者的蟑螂血清特异性 IgE(sIgE)下降程度相似,而 SCIT 参与者的蟑螂 SPT 乳突大小下降幅度更大(p=0.04)。在接受 SCIT 的受试者中,蟑螂 sIgG4 增加了 200 倍(pConclusion):一年的 SCIT 未能改变 NAC TNSS 和鼻腔对蟑螂过敏原挑战的转录组反应,尽管它对过敏原特异性皮肤测试、诱导血清 sIgG4 生成和下调过敏原刺激的 T 细胞反应具有系统性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A pediatric randomized, controlled trial of German cockroach subcutaneous immunotherapy

Background

Cockroach allergy contributes to morbidity among urban children with asthma. Few trials address the effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with cockroach allergen among these at-risk children.

Objectives

We sought to determine whether nasal allergen challenge (NAC) responses to cockroach allergen would improve following 1 year of SCIT.

Methods

Urban children with asthma, who were cockroach-sensitized and reactive on NAC, participated in a year-long randomized double-blind placebo-controlled SCIT trial using German cockroach extract. The primary endpoint was the change in mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) during NAC after 12 months of SCIT. Changes in nasal transcriptomic responses during NAC, skin prick test wheal size, serum allergen-specific antibody production, and T-cell responses to cockroach allergen were assessed.

Results

Changes in mean NAC TNSS did not differ between SCIT-assigned (n = 28) versus placebo-assigned (n = 29) participants (P = .63). Nasal transcriptomic responses correlated with TNSS, but a treatment effect was not observed. Cockroach serum-specific IgE decreased to a similar extent in both groups, while decreased cockroach skin prick test wheal size was greater among SCIT participants (P = .04). A 200-fold increase in cockroach serum-specific IgG4 was observed among subjects receiving SCIT (P < .001) but was unchanged in the placebo group. T-cell IL-4 responses following cockroach allergen stimulation decreased to a greater extent among SCIT versus placebo (P = .002), while no effect was observed for IL-10 or IFN-γ.

Conclusions

A year of SCIT failed to alter NAC TNSS and nasal transcriptome responses to cockroach allergen challenge despite systemic effects on allergen-specific skin tests, induction of serum-specific IgG4 serum production and down-modulation of allergen-stimulated T-cell responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
1302
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is a prestigious publication that features groundbreaking research in the fields of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. This influential journal publishes high-impact research papers that explore various topics, including asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, primary immune deficiencies, occupational and environmental allergy, and other allergic and immunologic diseases. The articles not only report on clinical trials and mechanistic studies but also provide insights into novel therapies, underlying mechanisms, and important discoveries that contribute to our understanding of these diseases. By sharing this valuable information, the journal aims to enhance the diagnosis and management of patients in the future.
期刊最新文献
Association of CD19+-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy with Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infection and Mortality. Anti-IgE and Food Allergy. Baseline Epitope-Specific IgE Profiles are Predictive of Sustained Unresponsiveness or High Threshold One-Year Post OIT in the POISED Trial. Covid-19 mRNA vaccine allergy. Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1