肺癌和肺间质异常患者的术后肺功能。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1007/s11748-024-02037-7
Norifumi Tsubokawa, Takahiro Mimae, Takeshi Mimura, Atsushi Kagimoto, Atsushi Kamigaichi, Nobutaka Kawamoto, Yoshihiro Miyata, Morihito Okada
{"title":"肺癌和肺间质异常患者的术后肺功能。","authors":"Norifumi Tsubokawa, Takahiro Mimae, Takeshi Mimura, Atsushi Kagimoto, Atsushi Kamigaichi, Nobutaka Kawamoto, Yoshihiro Miyata, Morihito Okada","doi":"10.1007/s11748-024-02037-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the impact of radiological interstitial lung abnormalities on the postoperative pulmonary functions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1191 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resections and pulmonary function tests ≥ 6 months postoperatively were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates were compared between patients with and without interstitial lung abnormalities and according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications. Surgical procedures were divided into wedge resection, 1-2 segment resection, and 3-5 segment resection groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates 6 months after wedge resection were observed between the interstitial lung abnormality [n = 202] and non-interstitial lung abnormality groups [n = 989] [vital capacity [VC]: 6.82% vs. 5.00%; forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]: 7.05% vs. 7.14%]. After anatomical resection, these values were significantly lower in the interstitial lung abnormality group than in the non-interstitial lung abnormality group [VC: 1-2 segments, 12.50% vs. 9.93%; 3-5 segments, 17.42% vs. 14.23%; FEV1: 1-2 segments: 13.36% vs. 10.27%; 3-5 segments: 17.36% vs. 14.39%]. No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of interstitial lung abnormalities had a minimal effect on postoperative pulmonary functions after wedge resections; however, pulmonary functions significantly worsened after segmentectomy or lobectomy, regardless of the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classification in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"786-795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung abnormalities.\",\"authors\":\"Norifumi Tsubokawa, Takahiro Mimae, Takeshi Mimura, Atsushi Kagimoto, Atsushi Kamigaichi, Nobutaka Kawamoto, Yoshihiro Miyata, Morihito Okada\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11748-024-02037-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the impact of radiological interstitial lung abnormalities on the postoperative pulmonary functions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1191 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resections and pulmonary function tests ≥ 6 months postoperatively were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates were compared between patients with and without interstitial lung abnormalities and according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications. Surgical procedures were divided into wedge resection, 1-2 segment resection, and 3-5 segment resection groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates 6 months after wedge resection were observed between the interstitial lung abnormality [n = 202] and non-interstitial lung abnormality groups [n = 989] [vital capacity [VC]: 6.82% vs. 5.00%; forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]: 7.05% vs. 7.14%]. After anatomical resection, these values were significantly lower in the interstitial lung abnormality group than in the non-interstitial lung abnormality group [VC: 1-2 segments, 12.50% vs. 9.93%; 3-5 segments, 17.42% vs. 14.23%; FEV1: 1-2 segments: 13.36% vs. 10.27%; 3-5 segments: 17.36% vs. 14.39%]. No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of interstitial lung abnormalities had a minimal effect on postoperative pulmonary functions after wedge resections; however, pulmonary functions significantly worsened after segmentectomy or lobectomy, regardless of the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classification in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"786-795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-024-02037-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-024-02037-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究放射性肺间质异常对非小细胞肺癌患者术后肺功能的影响:我们研究了放射性肺间质异常对非小细胞肺癌患者术后肺功能的影响:回顾性研究了1191例临床IA期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者接受了肺切除术,术后肺功能检测≥6个月。根据肺间质异常的放射学分类,比较了有肺间质异常和无肺间质异常患者的术后肺功能减退率。手术分为楔形切除组、1-2段切除组和3-5段切除组:结果:楔形切除术后 6 个月,肺间质异常组[n = 202]和非肺间质异常组[n = 989]的术后肺功能下降率[生命容量[VC]:6.82% vs. 5.00%;1 秒内用力呼气容积[FEV1]:7.05% vs. 7.14%]无明显差异。解剖切除后,肺间质异常组的上述数值明显低于非肺间质异常组[VC:1-2 段,12.50% 对 9.93%;3-5 段,17.42% 对 14.23%;FEV1:1-2 段,13.36% 对 10.36%]:13.36% vs. 10.27%;3-5 段:17.36% vs. 14.23%:17.36% vs. 14.39%]。根据肺间质异常的放射学分类,术后肺功能下降率无明显差异:结论:楔形切除术后,肺间质异常对术后肺功能的影响极小;然而,在早期非小细胞肺癌患者中,无论肺间质异常的放射学分类如何,肺段切除术或肺叶切除术后肺功能都会明显恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung abnormalities.

Objective: We investigated the impact of radiological interstitial lung abnormalities on the postoperative pulmonary functions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods: A total of 1191 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resections and pulmonary function tests ≥ 6 months postoperatively were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates were compared between patients with and without interstitial lung abnormalities and according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications. Surgical procedures were divided into wedge resection, 1-2 segment resection, and 3-5 segment resection groups.

Results: No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates 6 months after wedge resection were observed between the interstitial lung abnormality [n = 202] and non-interstitial lung abnormality groups [n = 989] [vital capacity [VC]: 6.82% vs. 5.00%; forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]: 7.05% vs. 7.14%]. After anatomical resection, these values were significantly lower in the interstitial lung abnormality group than in the non-interstitial lung abnormality group [VC: 1-2 segments, 12.50% vs. 9.93%; 3-5 segments, 17.42% vs. 14.23%; FEV1: 1-2 segments: 13.36% vs. 10.27%; 3-5 segments: 17.36% vs. 14.39%]. No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications were observed.

Conclusions: The presence of interstitial lung abnormalities had a minimal effect on postoperative pulmonary functions after wedge resections; however, pulmonary functions significantly worsened after segmentectomy or lobectomy, regardless of the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classification in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung abnormalities. Lessons from short chest drain management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Long-term results of the frozen elephant trunk technique in primary chronic type B aortic dissection. A balanced mitral leaflet and large ring strategy avoids systolic anterior motion in Barlow's disease. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1