澳大利亚肉鸡粪便和临床大肠埃希氏菌分离物中的病毒相关基因。

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Australian Veterinary Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1111/avj.13339
L Awawdeh, R Forrest, C Turni, R Cobbold, J Henning, J Gibson
{"title":"澳大利亚肉鸡粪便和临床大肠埃希氏菌分离物中的病毒相关基因。","authors":"L Awawdeh,&nbsp;R Forrest,&nbsp;C Turni,&nbsp;R Cobbold,&nbsp;J Henning,&nbsp;J Gibson","doi":"10.1111/avj.13339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A healthy chicken's intestinal flora harbours a rich reservoir of <i>Escherichia coli</i> as part of the commensal microbiota. However, some strains, known as avian pathogenic <i>E. coli</i> (APEC), carry specific virulence genes (VGs) that enable them to invade and cause extraintestinal infections such as avian colibacillosis. Although several VG combinations have been identified, the pathogenic mechanisms associated with APEC are ill-defined. The current study screened a subset of 88 <i>E. coli</i> isolates selected from 237 pre-existing isolates obtained from commercial poultry flocks in Australia. The 88 isolates were selected based on their enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and included 29 <i>E. coli</i> isolates cultured from chickens with colibacillosis (referred to as clinical <i>E. coli</i> or CEC) and 59 faecal <i>E. coli</i> (FEC) isolates cultured from clinically healthy chickens. The isolates were screened for the presence of 35 previously reported VGs. Of these, 34 were identified, with <i>iucA</i> not being detected. VGs <i>focG</i>, <i>hlyA</i> and <i>sfa/foc</i> were only detected in FEC isolates. Eight VGs had a prevalence of 90% or above in the CEC isolates. Specifically, <i>astA</i> (100%); <i>feoB</i> (96.6%); <i>iutA</i>, <i>iss</i>, <i>ompT</i>, <i>iroN</i> and <i>hlyF</i> (all 93.1%); and <i>vat</i> (89.7%). The prevalence of these were significantly lower in FEC isolates (<i>astA</i> 79.7%, <i>feoB</i> 77.9%, <i>iutA</i> 52.5%, <i>iss</i> 45.8%, <i>ompT</i> 50.9%, <i>iroN</i> 37.3%, <i>hlyF</i> 50.9% and <i>vat</i> 42.4%). The odds ratios that each of these eight VGs were more likely to be associated with CEC than FEC ranged from 7.8 to 21.9. These eight VGs may be used to better define APEC and diagnostically detect APEC in Australia. Further investigations are needed to identify the roles of these VGs in pathogenicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8661,"journal":{"name":"Australian Veterinary Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avj.13339","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virulence-associated genes in faecal and clinical Escherichia coli isolates cultured from broiler chickens in Australia\",\"authors\":\"L Awawdeh,&nbsp;R Forrest,&nbsp;C Turni,&nbsp;R Cobbold,&nbsp;J Henning,&nbsp;J Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/avj.13339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A healthy chicken's intestinal flora harbours a rich reservoir of <i>Escherichia coli</i> as part of the commensal microbiota. However, some strains, known as avian pathogenic <i>E. coli</i> (APEC), carry specific virulence genes (VGs) that enable them to invade and cause extraintestinal infections such as avian colibacillosis. Although several VG combinations have been identified, the pathogenic mechanisms associated with APEC are ill-defined. The current study screened a subset of 88 <i>E. coli</i> isolates selected from 237 pre-existing isolates obtained from commercial poultry flocks in Australia. The 88 isolates were selected based on their enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and included 29 <i>E. coli</i> isolates cultured from chickens with colibacillosis (referred to as clinical <i>E. coli</i> or CEC) and 59 faecal <i>E. coli</i> (FEC) isolates cultured from clinically healthy chickens. The isolates were screened for the presence of 35 previously reported VGs. Of these, 34 were identified, with <i>iucA</i> not being detected. VGs <i>focG</i>, <i>hlyA</i> and <i>sfa/foc</i> were only detected in FEC isolates. Eight VGs had a prevalence of 90% or above in the CEC isolates. Specifically, <i>astA</i> (100%); <i>feoB</i> (96.6%); <i>iutA</i>, <i>iss</i>, <i>ompT</i>, <i>iroN</i> and <i>hlyF</i> (all 93.1%); and <i>vat</i> (89.7%). The prevalence of these were significantly lower in FEC isolates (<i>astA</i> 79.7%, <i>feoB</i> 77.9%, <i>iutA</i> 52.5%, <i>iss</i> 45.8%, <i>ompT</i> 50.9%, <i>iroN</i> 37.3%, <i>hlyF</i> 50.9% and <i>vat</i> 42.4%). The odds ratios that each of these eight VGs were more likely to be associated with CEC than FEC ranged from 7.8 to 21.9. These eight VGs may be used to better define APEC and diagnostically detect APEC in Australia. Further investigations are needed to identify the roles of these VGs in pathogenicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avj.13339\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avj.13339\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avj.13339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为共生微生物群的一部分,健康鸡的肠道菌群中含有丰富的大肠埃希氏菌。然而,一些被称为禽致病性大肠杆菌(APEC)的菌株携带特异性毒力基因(VGs),使其能够入侵并引起肠道外感染,如禽大肠杆菌病。虽然已经确定了几种 VG 组合,但与 APEC 相关的致病机制尚不明确。目前的研究筛选了从澳大利亚商业禽群中获得的 237 个已有分离物中选出的 88 个大肠杆菌分离物子集。这 88 个分离物是根据其肠杆菌重复基因间共识(ERIC)和抗菌药耐药性(AMR)特征筛选出来的,其中包括 29 个从患有大肠杆菌病(称为临床大肠杆菌或 CEC)的鸡中培养出来的大肠杆菌分离物和 59 个从临床健康鸡中培养出来的粪便大肠杆菌(FEC)分离物。对这些分离物进行了筛查,以确定是否含有 35 种以前报道过的 VG。其中 34 个已被鉴定,iucA 未被检测到。VGs focG、hlyA 和 sfa/foc 只在 FEC 分离物中检测到。有 8 种 VG 在 CEC 分离物中的流行率达到或超过 90%。具体包括:astA(100%);feoB(96.6%);iutA、iss、ombT、iroN 和 hlyF(均为 93.1%);以及 vat(89.7%)。这些基因在 FEC 分离物中的流行率明显较低(astA 79.7%、feoB 77.9%、iutA 52.5%、iss 45.8%、ombT 50.9%、iroN 37.3%、hlyF 50.9%和 vat 42.4%)。这八种 VG 与 CEC 相关的几率比与 FEC 相关的几率大,从 7.8 到 21.9 不等。在澳大利亚,这八种 VG 可用于更好地定义 APEC 和诊断性检测 APEC。还需要进一步调查,以确定这些 VGs 在致病性中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virulence-associated genes in faecal and clinical Escherichia coli isolates cultured from broiler chickens in Australia

A healthy chicken's intestinal flora harbours a rich reservoir of Escherichia coli as part of the commensal microbiota. However, some strains, known as avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC), carry specific virulence genes (VGs) that enable them to invade and cause extraintestinal infections such as avian colibacillosis. Although several VG combinations have been identified, the pathogenic mechanisms associated with APEC are ill-defined. The current study screened a subset of 88 E. coli isolates selected from 237 pre-existing isolates obtained from commercial poultry flocks in Australia. The 88 isolates were selected based on their enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and included 29 E. coli isolates cultured from chickens with colibacillosis (referred to as clinical E. coli or CEC) and 59 faecal E. coli (FEC) isolates cultured from clinically healthy chickens. The isolates were screened for the presence of 35 previously reported VGs. Of these, 34 were identified, with iucA not being detected. VGs focG, hlyA and sfa/foc were only detected in FEC isolates. Eight VGs had a prevalence of 90% or above in the CEC isolates. Specifically, astA (100%); feoB (96.6%); iutA, iss, ompT, iroN and hlyF (all 93.1%); and vat (89.7%). The prevalence of these were significantly lower in FEC isolates (astA 79.7%, feoB 77.9%, iutA 52.5%, iss 45.8%, ompT 50.9%, iroN 37.3%, hlyF 50.9% and vat 42.4%). The odds ratios that each of these eight VGs were more likely to be associated with CEC than FEC ranged from 7.8 to 21.9. These eight VGs may be used to better define APEC and diagnostically detect APEC in Australia. Further investigations are needed to identify the roles of these VGs in pathogenicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Veterinary Journal
Australian Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Over the past 80 years, the Australian Veterinary Journal (AVJ) has been providing the veterinary profession with leading edge clinical and scientific research, case reports, reviews. news and timely coverage of industry issues. AJV is Australia''s premier veterinary science text and is distributed monthly to over 5,500 Australian Veterinary Association members and subscribers.
期刊最新文献
Signalment, clinical characteristics and outcomes of an Australian population of dogs with steroid responsive meningitis-arteritis (SRMA) - 124 cases (2013-2023). An evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of diagnostic tests for foot and mouth disease: are novel diagnostic tests for FMD more feasible than conventional tests in Southeast Asia? Peri-parturient ewe mortality in commercial, southern Australian, non-Merino ewe flocks: establishing the frequency and investigating causes. Clinical hypothyroidism in a cat associated with sulfonamide administration for the management of intracranial nocardiosis. Bleeding disorder in a Holstein calf comparable to bovine neonatal pancytopenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1