利用 LC-MS/MS 法测定兔泪液中的抗菌剂:对眼部药代动力学研究的启示

IF 1.9 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Mass Spectrometry Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1002/jms.5031
Amol Chhatrapati Bisen, Anjali Mishra, Sristi Agrawal, Sachin Nashik Sanap, Arpon Biswas, Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Rabi Sankar Bhatta
{"title":"利用 LC-MS/MS 法测定兔泪液中的抗菌剂:对眼部药代动力学研究的启示","authors":"Amol Chhatrapati Bisen,&nbsp;Anjali Mishra,&nbsp;Sristi Agrawal,&nbsp;Sachin Nashik Sanap,&nbsp;Arpon Biswas,&nbsp;Sarvesh Kumar Verma,&nbsp;Rabi Sankar Bhatta","doi":"10.1002/jms.5031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing ocular microbial infections typically requires pharmacotherapy using antibiotic eye drops, such as moxifloxacin hydrochloride (MFX), combined with an antifungal agent like amphotericin B (AB). We carried out and validated an LC–MS/MS assay to quantify these compounds in rabbit tear fluid in order to look into the pharmacokinetics of these two drugs. We employed a protein precipitation technique for the extraction of drugs under examination. A Waters Symmetry C<sub>18</sub> column was used to separate the analytes and internal standard. The composition of the mobile phase was like (A) 0.1% v/v formic acid in water and (B) methanol. The detection of MFX and AB was accomplished through the utilization of positive ion electrospray ionization under multiple reaction monitoring mode. The linearity curves for both analytes exhibited an acceptable trendline across a concentration range of 2.34–300 ng/mL for MFX and 7.81–1000 ng/mL for AB in surrogate rabbit tear fluid. The lower limit of quantitation for MFX was 2.34 ng/mL, while for AB, it was 7.81 ng/mL. The approach was strictly validated, encompassing tests of selectivity, linearity (with <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.99), precision, accuracy, matrix effects, and stability. Consequently, we employed this method to evaluate the pharmacokinetics profiles of MFX and AB in rabbit tear fluid following single topical doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codetermination of antimicrobial agents in rabbit tear fluid using LC–MS/MS assay: Insights into ocular pharmacokinetic study\",\"authors\":\"Amol Chhatrapati Bisen,&nbsp;Anjali Mishra,&nbsp;Sristi Agrawal,&nbsp;Sachin Nashik Sanap,&nbsp;Arpon Biswas,&nbsp;Sarvesh Kumar Verma,&nbsp;Rabi Sankar Bhatta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jms.5031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Managing ocular microbial infections typically requires pharmacotherapy using antibiotic eye drops, such as moxifloxacin hydrochloride (MFX), combined with an antifungal agent like amphotericin B (AB). We carried out and validated an LC–MS/MS assay to quantify these compounds in rabbit tear fluid in order to look into the pharmacokinetics of these two drugs. We employed a protein precipitation technique for the extraction of drugs under examination. A Waters Symmetry C<sub>18</sub> column was used to separate the analytes and internal standard. The composition of the mobile phase was like (A) 0.1% v/v formic acid in water and (B) methanol. The detection of MFX and AB was accomplished through the utilization of positive ion electrospray ionization under multiple reaction monitoring mode. The linearity curves for both analytes exhibited an acceptable trendline across a concentration range of 2.34–300 ng/mL for MFX and 7.81–1000 ng/mL for AB in surrogate rabbit tear fluid. The lower limit of quantitation for MFX was 2.34 ng/mL, while for AB, it was 7.81 ng/mL. The approach was strictly validated, encompassing tests of selectivity, linearity (with <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.99), precision, accuracy, matrix effects, and stability. Consequently, we employed this method to evaluate the pharmacokinetics profiles of MFX and AB in rabbit tear fluid following single topical doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗眼部微生物感染通常需要使用抗生素眼药水(如盐酸莫西沙星(MFX))和抗真菌剂(如两性霉素 B(AB))。为了研究这两种药物的药代动力学,我们采用了一种 LC-MS/MS 检测方法来定量检测兔子泪液中的这些化合物,并对该方法进行了验证。我们采用蛋白质沉淀技术提取待测药物。采用 Waters Symmetry C18 色谱柱分离分析物和内标物。流动相的组成为 (A) 0.1% v/v 甲酸水溶液和 (B) 甲醇。在多反应监测模式下,利用正离子电喷雾离子化技术检测 MFX 和 AB。在代用兔泪液中,MFX 的线性范围为 2.34-300 纳克/毫升,AB 的线性范围为 7.81-1000 纳克/毫升。MFX 的定量下限为 2.34 纳克/毫升,而 AB 的定量下限为 7.81 纳克/毫升。该方法经过严格验证,包括选择性、线性(r2 > 0.99)、精密度、准确度、基质效应和稳定性测试。因此,我们采用这种方法评估了单次局部用药后兔子泪液中 MFX 和 AB 的药代动力学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Codetermination of antimicrobial agents in rabbit tear fluid using LC–MS/MS assay: Insights into ocular pharmacokinetic study

Managing ocular microbial infections typically requires pharmacotherapy using antibiotic eye drops, such as moxifloxacin hydrochloride (MFX), combined with an antifungal agent like amphotericin B (AB). We carried out and validated an LC–MS/MS assay to quantify these compounds in rabbit tear fluid in order to look into the pharmacokinetics of these two drugs. We employed a protein precipitation technique for the extraction of drugs under examination. A Waters Symmetry C18 column was used to separate the analytes and internal standard. The composition of the mobile phase was like (A) 0.1% v/v formic acid in water and (B) methanol. The detection of MFX and AB was accomplished through the utilization of positive ion electrospray ionization under multiple reaction monitoring mode. The linearity curves for both analytes exhibited an acceptable trendline across a concentration range of 2.34–300 ng/mL for MFX and 7.81–1000 ng/mL for AB in surrogate rabbit tear fluid. The lower limit of quantitation for MFX was 2.34 ng/mL, while for AB, it was 7.81 ng/mL. The approach was strictly validated, encompassing tests of selectivity, linearity (with r2 > 0.99), precision, accuracy, matrix effects, and stability. Consequently, we employed this method to evaluate the pharmacokinetics profiles of MFX and AB in rabbit tear fluid following single topical doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Journal of Mass Spectrometry 化学-光谱学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mass Spectrometry publishes papers on a broad range of topics of interest to scientists working in both fundamental and applied areas involving the study of gaseous ions. The aim of JMS is to serve the scientific community with information provided and arranged to help senior investigators to better stay abreast of new discoveries and studies in their own field, to make them aware of events and developments in associated fields, and to provide students and newcomers the basic tools with which to learn fundamental and applied aspects of mass spectrometry.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Native Mass Spectrometry Toward Cellular Biology Strategies for Top–Down Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange-Mass Spectrometry: A Mini Review and Perspective B4C-Assisted Paper Spray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Issue Information Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Gatifloxacin and Dexamethasone in Rabbit Ocular Biofluid Using a Sensitive and Selective LC–MS/MS Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1