药剂师对在社区实践中提供大肠癌筛查的看法。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102111
{"title":"药剂师对在社区实践中提供大肠癌筛查的看法。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common diagnosed cancer in the United States. Kentucky pharmacists can be instrumental in the CRC early detection process through board-authorized protocols (BAPs): a regulatory approach managed by the Kentucky Board of Pharmacy that allows pharmacists to increase access to care while saving lives through early detection screening. Determining the barriers and successes of implementing CRC screening can improve access to education and care for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate community pharmacists’ perceptions of implementing a colorectal screening for patients via protocol and identify pharmacists’ confidence and potential barriers such as cost, staff support, and patient need for colorectal screening in community pharmacy settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A survey was sent electronically to a convenience sample of pharmacists throughout Kentucky. The survey collected demographics, opinions regarding implementation of the CRC screening protocol, pharmacists’ perceptions of knowledge, and the barriers and benefits associated with implementation of CRC services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 207 responses were received and of those 151 were from community-based pharmacists; 34% of pharmacists agreed or strongly agreed to offer CRC screening. Overwhelmingly, 81.3% of pharmacists reported need for additional training. There were no statistically significant differences in support among demographic factors: practice setting (<em>P</em> = 0.937), gender (<em>P</em> = 0.973), age (<em>P</em> = 0.568), and years practicing (<em>P</em> = 0.870). In addition, the most common barriers reported were lack of reimbursement (97%), lack of willingness for patients to pay (98%), and time or workflow issues (97%). Most pharmacists stated that lack of trust in pharmacists was not a barrier (87%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, 34% of pharmacists either agreed or strongly agreed to offer CRC screening via the board-approved protocol. However, overwhelmingly the pharmacists believe that there is a need for additional training and opportunities for additional training on BAPs have increased drastically in Kentucky. Barriers such as lack of reimbursement, willingness to pay, and time or workflow issues need to be overcome before implementation. Finding solutions to these barriers will increase pharmacist’s support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacists perceptions of providing colorectal cancer screening in community-based practice\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common diagnosed cancer in the United States. Kentucky pharmacists can be instrumental in the CRC early detection process through board-authorized protocols (BAPs): a regulatory approach managed by the Kentucky Board of Pharmacy that allows pharmacists to increase access to care while saving lives through early detection screening. Determining the barriers and successes of implementing CRC screening can improve access to education and care for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate community pharmacists’ perceptions of implementing a colorectal screening for patients via protocol and identify pharmacists’ confidence and potential barriers such as cost, staff support, and patient need for colorectal screening in community pharmacy settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A survey was sent electronically to a convenience sample of pharmacists throughout Kentucky. The survey collected demographics, opinions regarding implementation of the CRC screening protocol, pharmacists’ perceptions of knowledge, and the barriers and benefits associated with implementation of CRC services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 207 responses were received and of those 151 were from community-based pharmacists; 34% of pharmacists agreed or strongly agreed to offer CRC screening. Overwhelmingly, 81.3% of pharmacists reported need for additional training. There were no statistically significant differences in support among demographic factors: practice setting (<em>P</em> = 0.937), gender (<em>P</em> = 0.973), age (<em>P</em> = 0.568), and years practicing (<em>P</em> = 0.870). In addition, the most common barriers reported were lack of reimbursement (97%), lack of willingness for patients to pay (98%), and time or workflow issues (97%). Most pharmacists stated that lack of trust in pharmacists was not a barrier (87%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, 34% of pharmacists either agreed or strongly agreed to offer CRC screening via the board-approved protocol. However, overwhelmingly the pharmacists believe that there is a need for additional training and opportunities for additional training on BAPs have increased drastically in Kentucky. Barriers such as lack of reimbursement, willingness to pay, and time or workflow issues need to be overcome before implementation. Finding solutions to these barriers will increase pharmacist’s support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结肠直肠癌 (CRC) 是美国第三大常见癌症。肯塔基州药剂师可以通过委员会授权协议 (BAP) 在 CRC 早期检测过程中发挥重要作用:这是由肯塔基州药剂委员会管理的一种监管方法,允许药剂师通过早期检测筛查在挽救生命的同时增加获得护理的机会。确定实施 CRC 筛查的障碍和成功之处可以改善患者获得教育和护理的机会:本研究旨在评估社区药剂师对通过协议为患者实施结直肠癌筛查的看法,并确定药剂师的信心和潜在障碍,如成本、员工支持和患者对社区药房结直肠癌筛查的需求:通过电子方式向肯塔基州的药剂师发送了一份调查问卷。结果:共收到 207 份回复,其中 151 份来自社区药剂师。34%的药剂师同意或非常同意提供 CRC 筛查服务。81.3%的药剂师表示需要额外培训。各人口统计学因素在支持率上没有明显差异:执业地点(P 值 = 0.937)、性别(P 值 = 0.973)、年龄(P 值 = 0.568)、执业年限(P 值 = 0.870)。此外,最常见的障碍是缺乏报销(97%)、患者缺乏支付意愿(98%)以及时间或工作流程问题(97%)。大多数药剂师表示,对药剂师缺乏信任不是障碍(87%):总体而言,34% 的药剂师同意或非常同意通过委员会批准的方案提供大肠癌筛查。然而,绝大多数药剂师认为需要进行额外培训,而在肯塔基州,就委员会批准的方案进行额外培训的机会已大幅增加。缺乏报销、支付意愿、时间或工作流程问题等障碍是实施前需要克服的。找到这些障碍的解决方案将增加药剂师的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacists perceptions of providing colorectal cancer screening in community-based practice

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common diagnosed cancer in the United States. Kentucky pharmacists can be instrumental in the CRC early detection process through board-authorized protocols (BAPs): a regulatory approach managed by the Kentucky Board of Pharmacy that allows pharmacists to increase access to care while saving lives through early detection screening. Determining the barriers and successes of implementing CRC screening can improve access to education and care for patients.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate community pharmacists’ perceptions of implementing a colorectal screening for patients via protocol and identify pharmacists’ confidence and potential barriers such as cost, staff support, and patient need for colorectal screening in community pharmacy settings.

Methods

A survey was sent electronically to a convenience sample of pharmacists throughout Kentucky. The survey collected demographics, opinions regarding implementation of the CRC screening protocol, pharmacists’ perceptions of knowledge, and the barriers and benefits associated with implementation of CRC services.

Results

A total of 207 responses were received and of those 151 were from community-based pharmacists; 34% of pharmacists agreed or strongly agreed to offer CRC screening. Overwhelmingly, 81.3% of pharmacists reported need for additional training. There were no statistically significant differences in support among demographic factors: practice setting (P = 0.937), gender (P = 0.973), age (P = 0.568), and years practicing (P = 0.870). In addition, the most common barriers reported were lack of reimbursement (97%), lack of willingness for patients to pay (98%), and time or workflow issues (97%). Most pharmacists stated that lack of trust in pharmacists was not a barrier (87%).

Conclusions

Overall, 34% of pharmacists either agreed or strongly agreed to offer CRC screening via the board-approved protocol. However, overwhelmingly the pharmacists believe that there is a need for additional training and opportunities for additional training on BAPs have increased drastically in Kentucky. Barriers such as lack of reimbursement, willingness to pay, and time or workflow issues need to be overcome before implementation. Finding solutions to these barriers will increase pharmacist’s support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating a Generative Artificial Intelligence Accuracy in Providing Medication Instructions from Smartphone Images. Beyond the Fill: Navigating Pharmacy's Technological Future in 2050. Bringing Providers into the Community Pharmacy: Experiential Education. Feasibility of reaching populations at high risk for HIV in community pharmacies A shared passion for providing care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1