Panu H Nordback, Sandeep J Sebastin, Zachary Z Yong, Ellen Y Lee, Aymeric Y T Lim
{"title":"肩胛骨抬高征--评估胸廓出口综合征的一种新征象。","authors":"Panu H Nordback, Sandeep J Sebastin, Zachary Z Yong, Ellen Y Lee, Aymeric Y T Lim","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We noted that patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) have elevation of the ipsilateral scapula and named this the scapular elevation sign (SES). The aim was to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort, compare SES with other provocative tests and to determine the treatment effect on SES. <b>Methods:</b> First, normal asymptomatic subjects were prospectively assessed to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort. Second, patients with TOS were retrospectively examined for the presence of SES and four provocative tests: supraclavicular pressure, scalene test, elevated arm stress test (EAST) and the military brace manoeuvre. All patients were initially treated non-surgically. Surgery was offered to patients with persistent symptoms at 6 months. Patients were re-examined for the presence of the SES after treatment. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of SES in our normal cohort was 4% (2/53). Our study cohort included 20 patients with TOS. The SES was positive in 18 patients (90%). Supraclavicular pressure was positive in 11 (55%), scalene test in 13 (65%), EAST in 9 (45%) and military brace manoeuvre in 11 patients (55%). Following non-surgical treatment, six patients had symptom resolution, three had improvement, nine persistent symptoms and two were lost to follow-up. The SES was positive in one out of six patients with symptom resolution, two out of three patients with improvement and in all nine patients with persistent symptoms. Patients with persistent symptoms underwent surgery with symptom resolution in eight and improvement in one patient. The SES remained positive in two patients after surgical treatment. <b>Conclusions:</b> The SES is simple and sensitive, does not rely on variations in performance of the test and suitable for diagnosis and assessment of outcomes of TOS. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"231-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scapular Elevation Sign - A New Sign in Evaluation of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Panu H Nordback, Sandeep J Sebastin, Zachary Z Yong, Ellen Y Lee, Aymeric Y T Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835524500255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We noted that patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) have elevation of the ipsilateral scapula and named this the scapular elevation sign (SES). The aim was to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort, compare SES with other provocative tests and to determine the treatment effect on SES. <b>Methods:</b> First, normal asymptomatic subjects were prospectively assessed to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort. Second, patients with TOS were retrospectively examined for the presence of SES and four provocative tests: supraclavicular pressure, scalene test, elevated arm stress test (EAST) and the military brace manoeuvre. All patients were initially treated non-surgically. Surgery was offered to patients with persistent symptoms at 6 months. Patients were re-examined for the presence of the SES after treatment. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of SES in our normal cohort was 4% (2/53). Our study cohort included 20 patients with TOS. The SES was positive in 18 patients (90%). Supraclavicular pressure was positive in 11 (55%), scalene test in 13 (65%), EAST in 9 (45%) and military brace manoeuvre in 11 patients (55%). Following non-surgical treatment, six patients had symptom resolution, three had improvement, nine persistent symptoms and two were lost to follow-up. The SES was positive in one out of six patients with symptom resolution, two out of three patients with improvement and in all nine patients with persistent symptoms. Patients with persistent symptoms underwent surgery with symptom resolution in eight and improvement in one patient. The SES remained positive in two patients after surgical treatment. <b>Conclusions:</b> The SES is simple and sensitive, does not rely on variations in performance of the test and suitable for diagnosis and assessment of outcomes of TOS. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Diagnostic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"231-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:我们注意到胸廓出口综合征(TOS)患者的同侧肩胛骨会抬高,并将其命名为肩胛骨抬高征(SES)。我们的目的是确定 SES 在正常人群中的发病率,将 SES 与其他诱发试验进行比较,并确定对 SES 的治疗效果。研究方法首先,对无症状的正常人进行前瞻性评估,以确定正常人群中 SES 的患病率。其次,对 TOS 患者进行回顾性检查,以确定是否存在 SES 和四种刺激性试验:锁骨上压力、头皮试验、高抬臂压力试验 (EAST) 和军用支架动作。所有患者最初都接受了非手术治疗。6 个月后症状持续存在的患者将接受手术治疗。治疗后对患者进行复查,以确定是否存在 SES。结果:正常人群中 SES 的发病率为 4%(2/53)。我们的研究队列包括 20 名 TOS 患者。18 名患者(90%)的 SES 呈阳性。11名患者(55%)的锁骨上压力呈阳性,13名患者(65%)的头皮测试呈阳性,9名患者(45%)的EAST呈阳性,11名患者(55%)的军姿支撑动作呈阳性。非手术治疗后,6 名患者症状缓解,3 名患者症状改善,9 名患者症状持续存在,2 名患者失去随访机会。在症状缓解的 6 名患者中,有 1 人的 SES 为阳性;在症状改善的 3 名患者中,有 2 人的 SES 为阳性;在症状持续的 9 名患者中,SES 全部为阳性。有持续症状的患者接受了手术治疗,其中 8 人症状缓解,1 人症状改善。两名患者在手术治疗后 SES 仍呈阳性。结论:SES 简单灵敏,不依赖于测试表现的变化,适用于 TOS 的诊断和疗效评估。证据等级:三级(诊断)。
Scapular Elevation Sign - A New Sign in Evaluation of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.
Background: We noted that patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) have elevation of the ipsilateral scapula and named this the scapular elevation sign (SES). The aim was to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort, compare SES with other provocative tests and to determine the treatment effect on SES. Methods: First, normal asymptomatic subjects were prospectively assessed to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort. Second, patients with TOS were retrospectively examined for the presence of SES and four provocative tests: supraclavicular pressure, scalene test, elevated arm stress test (EAST) and the military brace manoeuvre. All patients were initially treated non-surgically. Surgery was offered to patients with persistent symptoms at 6 months. Patients were re-examined for the presence of the SES after treatment. Results: The prevalence of SES in our normal cohort was 4% (2/53). Our study cohort included 20 patients with TOS. The SES was positive in 18 patients (90%). Supraclavicular pressure was positive in 11 (55%), scalene test in 13 (65%), EAST in 9 (45%) and military brace manoeuvre in 11 patients (55%). Following non-surgical treatment, six patients had symptom resolution, three had improvement, nine persistent symptoms and two were lost to follow-up. The SES was positive in one out of six patients with symptom resolution, two out of three patients with improvement and in all nine patients with persistent symptoms. Patients with persistent symptoms underwent surgery with symptom resolution in eight and improvement in one patient. The SES remained positive in two patients after surgical treatment. Conclusions: The SES is simple and sensitive, does not rely on variations in performance of the test and suitable for diagnosis and assessment of outcomes of TOS. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).