利用 LC-MS/MS 和 LC-HRMS 同时耦合 ICP-MS,测定食品接触材料中的可萃取有机氟 (EOF) 总量,并对全氟和多氟烷基物质进行目标和非目标分析。

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1080/19440049.2024.2347491
Tengetile Nxumalo, Abdullah Akhdhar, Viktoria Müller, Amnah Al Zbedy, Andrea Raab, Milica Jovanovic, Erich Leitner, Andrew Kindness, Jörg Feldmann
{"title":"利用 LC-MS/MS 和 LC-HRMS 同时耦合 ICP-MS,测定食品接触材料中的可萃取有机氟 (EOF) 总量,并对全氟和多氟烷基物质进行目标和非目标分析。","authors":"Tengetile Nxumalo, Abdullah Akhdhar, Viktoria Müller, Amnah Al Zbedy, Andrea Raab, Milica Jovanovic, Erich Leitner, Andrew Kindness, Jörg Feldmann","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2024.2347491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Food contact materials (FCMs) from three countries were analysed for all extractable organofluorines (EOFs) from the materials and subsequently by target and non-target analysis for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The EOF varied by two orders of magnitude for FCM from UK and Saudi Arabia ranging between 2.14 and 483 ng cm<sup>-2</sup> (0.2-48 ng g<sup>-1</sup>) showing that one quarter of all samples were above the Danish regulation for PFAS in FCM. Target PFAS showed high variability in composition and accounted for less than 1% of the EOF. Non-target PFAS screening using HPLC-ICP-MS and coupled simultaneously to HRMS showed the occurrence of organofluorines which were identified by neither LC-MS/MS nor LC-HRMS. This illustrates that the current target PFAS approaches fail to identify EOFs from FCM, which would be a problem with the new EU proposal to ban all PFAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12295,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of total extractable organofluorine (EOF) in food contact materials and target and non-target analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS simultaneously coupled to ICP-MS.\",\"authors\":\"Tengetile Nxumalo, Abdullah Akhdhar, Viktoria Müller, Amnah Al Zbedy, Andrea Raab, Milica Jovanovic, Erich Leitner, Andrew Kindness, Jörg Feldmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19440049.2024.2347491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Food contact materials (FCMs) from three countries were analysed for all extractable organofluorines (EOFs) from the materials and subsequently by target and non-target analysis for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The EOF varied by two orders of magnitude for FCM from UK and Saudi Arabia ranging between 2.14 and 483 ng cm<sup>-2</sup> (0.2-48 ng g<sup>-1</sup>) showing that one quarter of all samples were above the Danish regulation for PFAS in FCM. Target PFAS showed high variability in composition and accounted for less than 1% of the EOF. Non-target PFAS screening using HPLC-ICP-MS and coupled simultaneously to HRMS showed the occurrence of organofluorines which were identified by neither LC-MS/MS nor LC-HRMS. This illustrates that the current target PFAS approaches fail to identify EOFs from FCM, which would be a problem with the new EU proposal to ban all PFAS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2347491\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2347491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对来自三个国家的食品接触材料(FCMs)进行了分析,以检测材料中的所有可萃取有机氟(EOFs),然后通过目标和非目标分析检测全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)。英国和沙特阿拉伯的含氟聚合物的 EOF 值相差两个数量级,介于 2.14 和 483 纳克 cm-2 之间(0.2-48 纳克 g-1),表明四分之一的样品超过了丹麦对含氟聚合物中 PFAS 的规定。目标全氟辛烷磺酸的成分变化很大,占 EOF 的比例不到 1%。使用 HPLC-ICP-MS 并同时结合 HRMS 进行的非目标 PFAS 筛选显示,存在 LC-MS/MS 和 LC-HRMS 都无法识别的有机氟。这说明当前的目标 PFAS 方法无法从 FCM 中识别出 EOF,这将成为欧盟禁止所有 PFAS 的新提案中的一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determination of total extractable organofluorine (EOF) in food contact materials and target and non-target analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS simultaneously coupled to ICP-MS.

Food contact materials (FCMs) from three countries were analysed for all extractable organofluorines (EOFs) from the materials and subsequently by target and non-target analysis for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The EOF varied by two orders of magnitude for FCM from UK and Saudi Arabia ranging between 2.14 and 483 ng cm-2 (0.2-48 ng g-1) showing that one quarter of all samples were above the Danish regulation for PFAS in FCM. Target PFAS showed high variability in composition and accounted for less than 1% of the EOF. Non-target PFAS screening using HPLC-ICP-MS and coupled simultaneously to HRMS showed the occurrence of organofluorines which were identified by neither LC-MS/MS nor LC-HRMS. This illustrates that the current target PFAS approaches fail to identify EOFs from FCM, which would be a problem with the new EU proposal to ban all PFAS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A publishes original research papers and critical reviews covering analytical methodology, occurrence, persistence, safety evaluation, detoxification and regulatory control of natural and man-made additives and contaminants in the food and animal feed chain. Papers are published in the areas of food additives including flavourings, pesticide and veterinary drug residues, environmental contaminants, plant toxins, mycotoxins, marine biotoxins, trace elements, migration from food packaging, food process contaminants, adulteration, authenticity and allergenicity of foods. Papers are published on animal feed where residues and contaminants can give rise to food safety concerns. Contributions cover chemistry, biochemistry and bioavailability of these substances, factors affecting levels during production, processing, packaging and storage; the development of novel foods and processes; exposure and risk assessment.
期刊最新文献
Contaminants and residues have varied distributions in large volumes of wheat. Co-occurrence and correlation of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in processed foods intended for infants and young children: evaluation of two statistical approaches adapted to censored data and their implications for risk management. Hazard assessment of fenozan, a released non-intentionally added substance from polyester-based can coating. Preliminary risk assessment of exposure to 3-monochloropropanediol and glycidyl fatty acid esters from infant formula and baby food products on the Saudi market. Trends in acrylamide content in selected potato/sweet potato products on the Canadian market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1