对常规免疫疗法无效的慢性炎症性脱髓鞘多发性神经病患者使用利妥昔单抗的前瞻性开放标签试验。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2023-332844
Pietro Emiliano Doneddu, Dario Cocito, Raffaella Fazio, Luana Benedetti, Erdita Peci, Giuseppe Liberatore, Yuri Matteo Falzone, Francesco Germano, Francesca Gallia, Claudia Giannotta, Cinta Lleixà, Elisa Bianchi, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio
{"title":"对常规免疫疗法无效的慢性炎症性脱髓鞘多发性神经病患者使用利妥昔单抗的前瞻性开放标签试验。","authors":"Pietro Emiliano Doneddu, Dario Cocito, Raffaella Fazio, Luana Benedetti, Erdita Peci, Giuseppe Liberatore, Yuri Matteo Falzone, Francesco Germano, Francesca Gallia, Claudia Giannotta, Cinta Lleixà, Elisa Bianchi, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2023-332844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients not responding to conventional immune therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-label, prospective exploratory study was conducted with intravenous rituximab on 17 CIDP patients who had not responded to at least two first-line therapies. The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients who showed improvement 6 months after rituximab therapy. The percentage of responders to rituximab, along with a 95% CI, was reported and compared with the 30% response rate after other immunosuppressive drugs previously documented in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 of the 17 treated patients (76.5%) showed improvement at 6 months (95% CI 50.1 to 93.2). Among the 14 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up (2 were lost to follow-up after showing improvement at months 8 and 10, and 1 deteriorated at 6 months), 13 (92.9%) demonstrated improvement at 12 months (95% CI 66.1 to 99.8). Nerve conduction parameters improved by at least 20% in two nerves in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients at 6 months and in 7 out of 13 (53.9%) at 12 months. None of the treated patients withdrew from the study due to side effects. There was a significant reduction of circulating CD19+ cells 15 days, 2, 6 and 12 months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rituximab seems to be a safe therapy in most patients with CIDP not responding to conventional immune therapies. The high percentage of patients who improved in this study suggests a possible positive effect of rituximab which is worth investigating in future randomised controlled clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05877040.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective open-label trial with rituximab in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy not responding to conventional immune therapies.\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Emiliano Doneddu, Dario Cocito, Raffaella Fazio, Luana Benedetti, Erdita Peci, Giuseppe Liberatore, Yuri Matteo Falzone, Francesco Germano, Francesca Gallia, Claudia Giannotta, Cinta Lleixà, Elisa Bianchi, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2023-332844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients not responding to conventional immune therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-label, prospective exploratory study was conducted with intravenous rituximab on 17 CIDP patients who had not responded to at least two first-line therapies. The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients who showed improvement 6 months after rituximab therapy. The percentage of responders to rituximab, along with a 95% CI, was reported and compared with the 30% response rate after other immunosuppressive drugs previously documented in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 of the 17 treated patients (76.5%) showed improvement at 6 months (95% CI 50.1 to 93.2). Among the 14 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up (2 were lost to follow-up after showing improvement at months 8 and 10, and 1 deteriorated at 6 months), 13 (92.9%) demonstrated improvement at 12 months (95% CI 66.1 to 99.8). Nerve conduction parameters improved by at least 20% in two nerves in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients at 6 months and in 7 out of 13 (53.9%) at 12 months. None of the treated patients withdrew from the study due to side effects. There was a significant reduction of circulating CD19+ cells 15 days, 2, 6 and 12 months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rituximab seems to be a safe therapy in most patients with CIDP not responding to conventional immune therapies. The high percentage of patients who improved in this study suggests a possible positive effect of rituximab which is worth investigating in future randomised controlled clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05877040.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-332844\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-332844","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估利妥昔单抗对常规免疫疗法无效的慢性炎症性脱髓鞘多发性神经病(CIDP)患者的疗效评估利妥昔单抗对常规免疫疗法无效的慢性炎症性脱髓鞘多发性神经病(CIDP)患者的疗效:对至少两种一线疗法无效的17名CIDP患者进行了静脉注射利妥昔单抗的开放标签、前瞻性探索研究。主要终点是确定利妥昔单抗治疗 6 个月后病情好转的患者比例。该研究报告了利妥昔单抗应答者的比例以及 95% 的 CI,并将其与之前文献中记载的使用其他免疫抑制剂后 30% 的应答率进行了比较:17名接受治疗的患者中有13名(76.5%)在6个月后病情有所改善(95% CI为50.1-93.2)。在完成 12 个月随访的 14 名患者中(2 人在第 8 个月和第 10 个月病情有所改善后失去了随访机会,1 人在 6 个月病情恶化),13 人(92.9%)在 12 个月时病情有所改善(95% CI 66.1 至 99.8)。15 名患者中有 6 名(40%)的两条神经的神经传导参数在 6 个月时改善了至少 20%,13 名患者中有 7 名(53.9%)的神经传导参数在 12 个月时改善了至少 20%。接受治疗的患者中没有一人因副作用而退出研究。治疗后15天、2个月、6个月和12个月,循环中的CD19+细胞明显减少:利妥昔单抗似乎是一种安全的疗法,适用于大多数对常规免疫疗法无效的 CIDP 患者。本研究中病情好转的患者比例很高,这表明利妥昔单抗可能具有积极作用,值得在未来的随机对照临床试验中进行研究:NCT05877040.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospective open-label trial with rituximab in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy not responding to conventional immune therapies.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients not responding to conventional immune therapies.

Methods: An open-label, prospective exploratory study was conducted with intravenous rituximab on 17 CIDP patients who had not responded to at least two first-line therapies. The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients who showed improvement 6 months after rituximab therapy. The percentage of responders to rituximab, along with a 95% CI, was reported and compared with the 30% response rate after other immunosuppressive drugs previously documented in the literature.

Results: 13 of the 17 treated patients (76.5%) showed improvement at 6 months (95% CI 50.1 to 93.2). Among the 14 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up (2 were lost to follow-up after showing improvement at months 8 and 10, and 1 deteriorated at 6 months), 13 (92.9%) demonstrated improvement at 12 months (95% CI 66.1 to 99.8). Nerve conduction parameters improved by at least 20% in two nerves in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients at 6 months and in 7 out of 13 (53.9%) at 12 months. None of the treated patients withdrew from the study due to side effects. There was a significant reduction of circulating CD19+ cells 15 days, 2, 6 and 12 months after treatment.

Conclusion: Rituximab seems to be a safe therapy in most patients with CIDP not responding to conventional immune therapies. The high percentage of patients who improved in this study suggests a possible positive effect of rituximab which is worth investigating in future randomised controlled clinical trials.

Trial registration number: NCT05877040.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
期刊最新文献
Apheresis therapies in MOGAD: a retrospective study of 117 therapeutic interventions in 571 attacks. Response to: 'Cortical Inexcitability in ALS: Correlating a Clinical Phenotype'. MYH7-related myopathies: clinical, myopathological and genotypic spectrum in a multicentre French cohort. Huntington's disease phenocopy syndromes revisited: a clinical comparison and next-generation sequencing exploration. Exercise as medicine in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1