非营利性医院解决住房问题的社区福利计划全国概览》(National Overview of Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Programs to Address Housing.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001984
Annalise Celano, Pauline Keselman, Timothy Barley, Ryan Schnautz, Benjamin Piller, Dylan Nunn, Maliek Scott, Cory Cronin, Berkeley Franz
{"title":"非营利性医院解决住房问题的社区福利计划全国概览》(National Overview of Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Programs to Address Housing.","authors":"Annalise Celano, Pauline Keselman, Timothy Barley, Ryan Schnautz, Benjamin Piller, Dylan Nunn, Maliek Scott, Cory Cronin, Berkeley Franz","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Housing is a critical social determinant of health that can be addressed through hospital-supported community benefit programming.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the prevalence of hospital-based programs that address housing-related needs, categorize the specific actions taken to address housing, and determine organizational and community-level factors associated with investing in housing.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined a nationally representative dataset of administrative documents from nonprofit hospitals that addressed social determinants of health in their federally mandated community benefit implementation plans. We conducted descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to examine hospital and community characteristics associated with whether a hospital invested in housing programs. Using an inductive approach, we categorized housing investments into distinct categories.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>The main outcome measure was a dichotomous variable representing whether a hospital invested in one or more housing programs in their community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty percent of hospitals invested in one or more housing programs. Hospitals that addressed housing in their implementation strategies were larger on average, less likely to be in rural communities, and more likely to be serving populations with greater housing needs. Housing programs fell into 1 of 7 categories: community partner collaboration (34%), social determinants of health screening (9%), medical respite centers (4%), community social determinants of health liaison (11%), addressing specific needs of homeless populations (16%), financial assistance (21%), and targeting high-risk populations (5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, a small subset of hospitals nationally are addressing housing. Hospitals may need additional policy support, external partnerships, and technical assistance to address housing in their communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Overview of Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Programs to Address Housing.\",\"authors\":\"Annalise Celano, Pauline Keselman, Timothy Barley, Ryan Schnautz, Benjamin Piller, Dylan Nunn, Maliek Scott, Cory Cronin, Berkeley Franz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Housing is a critical social determinant of health that can be addressed through hospital-supported community benefit programming.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the prevalence of hospital-based programs that address housing-related needs, categorize the specific actions taken to address housing, and determine organizational and community-level factors associated with investing in housing.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined a nationally representative dataset of administrative documents from nonprofit hospitals that addressed social determinants of health in their federally mandated community benefit implementation plans. We conducted descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to examine hospital and community characteristics associated with whether a hospital invested in housing programs. Using an inductive approach, we categorized housing investments into distinct categories.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>The main outcome measure was a dichotomous variable representing whether a hospital invested in one or more housing programs in their community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty percent of hospitals invested in one or more housing programs. Hospitals that addressed housing in their implementation strategies were larger on average, less likely to be in rural communities, and more likely to be serving populations with greater housing needs. Housing programs fell into 1 of 7 categories: community partner collaboration (34%), social determinants of health screening (9%), medical respite centers (4%), community social determinants of health liaison (11%), addressing specific needs of homeless populations (16%), financial assistance (21%), and targeting high-risk populations (5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, a small subset of hospitals nationally are addressing housing. Hospitals may need additional policy support, external partnerships, and technical assistance to address housing in their communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081473/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001984\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001984","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:住房是影响健康的一个重要社会决定因素,可以通过医院支持的社区福利计划来解决:目的:探讨以医院为基础的解决住房相关需求的项目的普遍性,对解决住房问题的具体行动进行分类,并确定与住房投资相关的组织和社区层面的因素:这项回顾性横断面研究对非营利性医院的行政文件数据集进行了研究,这些医院在联邦政府授权的社区福利实施计划中涉及了健康的社会决定因素,具有全国代表性。我们进行了描述性统计和双变量分析,以研究与医院是否投资住房项目相关的医院和社区特征。通过归纳法,我们将住房投资分为不同的类别:主要结果衡量指标是一个二分变量,代表医院是否在其社区投资了一个或多个住房项目:20%的医院投资了一项或多项住房计划。在其实施战略中涉及住房问题的医院平均规模较大,位于农村社区的可能性较小,为住房需求较大的人群提供服务的可能性较大。住房计划分为 7 个类别中的 1 个:社区合作伙伴合作(34%)、健康社会决定因素筛查(9%)、医疗暂存中心(4%)、健康社会决定因素社区联络(11%)、满足无家可归者的特定需求(16%)、财政援助(21%)以及针对高风险人群(5%):目前,全国只有一小部分医院在解决住房问题。医院可能需要更多的政策支持、外部合作和技术援助来解决其社区的住房问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National Overview of Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Programs to Address Housing.

Background: Housing is a critical social determinant of health that can be addressed through hospital-supported community benefit programming.

Objectives: To explore the prevalence of hospital-based programs that address housing-related needs, categorize the specific actions taken to address housing, and determine organizational and community-level factors associated with investing in housing.

Research design: This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined a nationally representative dataset of administrative documents from nonprofit hospitals that addressed social determinants of health in their federally mandated community benefit implementation plans. We conducted descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to examine hospital and community characteristics associated with whether a hospital invested in housing programs. Using an inductive approach, we categorized housing investments into distinct categories.

Measures: The main outcome measure was a dichotomous variable representing whether a hospital invested in one or more housing programs in their community.

Results: Twenty percent of hospitals invested in one or more housing programs. Hospitals that addressed housing in their implementation strategies were larger on average, less likely to be in rural communities, and more likely to be serving populations with greater housing needs. Housing programs fell into 1 of 7 categories: community partner collaboration (34%), social determinants of health screening (9%), medical respite centers (4%), community social determinants of health liaison (11%), addressing specific needs of homeless populations (16%), financial assistance (21%), and targeting high-risk populations (5%).

Conclusions: Currently, a small subset of hospitals nationally are addressing housing. Hospitals may need additional policy support, external partnerships, and technical assistance to address housing in their communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Homelessness With Primary Care and Acute Care Utilization Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth. Clinical Outcomes Among High-Risk Primary Care Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease: Methodological Challenges and Results From the STOP-DKD Study. Children and Youth Are a Critical Part of the American Story of Homelessness. Trajectories and Transitions in Service Use Among Older Veterans at High Risk of Long-Term Institutional Care. Conduct of Large, Multisite, Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Studies: Learnings From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Palliative Care Learning Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1