你能教我怎么打开盒子吗?考察幼儿对残疾和非残疾成人的教学行为

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Cognitive Development Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101449
Katherine M. Walton , Alayna R. Borowy , Madison L. Fecher , Laura Wagner
{"title":"你能教我怎么打开盒子吗?考察幼儿对残疾和非残疾成人的教学行为","authors":"Katherine M. Walton ,&nbsp;Alayna R. Borowy ,&nbsp;Madison L. Fecher ,&nbsp;Laura Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined how children (31–71 months; <em>N</em> = 85) adjusted their teaching behaviors with three learners, each posing different communicative challenges, in comparison to a control learner, who showed no communicative challenge. With a Disabled learner, children showed fewer explicit teaching behaviors, and more eye contact with their parents and/or the primary experimenter as compared to when teaching a Control learner. With a Tired learner who followed identical scripted actions as the Disabled learner, children’s overall rate of teaching behaviors was largely unchanged. With a Spanish Speaking learner, children spoke less frequently but showed more frequent eye contact with the learner. These results demonstrate that while preschool children can modify their teaching strategies to adapt to the needs of different learners, they appear to teach less effectively and show markers of uncertainty when teaching to learners with disabilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000340/pdfft?md5=76cab14c0e05affb1e6904f865493b4e&pid=1-s2.0-S0885201424000340-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can you teach me how to open the box?: Examining young children’s teaching behavior toward adults with and without disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Katherine M. Walton ,&nbsp;Alayna R. Borowy ,&nbsp;Madison L. Fecher ,&nbsp;Laura Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined how children (31–71 months; <em>N</em> = 85) adjusted their teaching behaviors with three learners, each posing different communicative challenges, in comparison to a control learner, who showed no communicative challenge. With a Disabled learner, children showed fewer explicit teaching behaviors, and more eye contact with their parents and/or the primary experimenter as compared to when teaching a Control learner. With a Tired learner who followed identical scripted actions as the Disabled learner, children’s overall rate of teaching behaviors was largely unchanged. With a Spanish Speaking learner, children spoke less frequently but showed more frequent eye contact with the learner. These results demonstrate that while preschool children can modify their teaching strategies to adapt to the needs of different learners, they appear to teach less effectively and show markers of uncertainty when teaching to learners with disabilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000340/pdfft?md5=76cab14c0e05affb1e6904f865493b4e&pid=1-s2.0-S0885201424000340-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了儿童(31-71 个月;N = 85)在面对三名学习者(每名学习者都面临不同的交际挑战)时,与面对一名没有交际挑战的对照组学习者时,如何调整自己的教学行为。与教导对照组学习者时相比,在教导残疾学习者时,儿童的明确教学行为较少,与父母和/或主要实验者的眼神接触较多。与一名 "疲倦 "学习者进行教学时,儿童的总体教学行为率基本保持不变。对于讲西班牙语的学习者,儿童说话的频率较低,但与学习者的眼神接触却更频繁。这些结果表明,虽然学龄前儿童可以根据不同学习者的需要修改他们的教学策略,但在对残疾学习者进行教学时,他们的教学效果似乎较差,并表现出不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can you teach me how to open the box?: Examining young children’s teaching behavior toward adults with and without disabilities

This study examined how children (31–71 months; N = 85) adjusted their teaching behaviors with three learners, each posing different communicative challenges, in comparison to a control learner, who showed no communicative challenge. With a Disabled learner, children showed fewer explicit teaching behaviors, and more eye contact with their parents and/or the primary experimenter as compared to when teaching a Control learner. With a Tired learner who followed identical scripted actions as the Disabled learner, children’s overall rate of teaching behaviors was largely unchanged. With a Spanish Speaking learner, children spoke less frequently but showed more frequent eye contact with the learner. These results demonstrate that while preschool children can modify their teaching strategies to adapt to the needs of different learners, they appear to teach less effectively and show markers of uncertainty when teaching to learners with disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
期刊最新文献
Development of L1-L2 naming skills in a monolingual context: Evidence from children and adolescents Children’s perceptions of intergroup similarity and dissimilarity and their association with attitudes towards a conflict out-group The “How many?” task inadequately assesses the understanding of the cardinality principle The shape bias in Mandarin-exposed young autistic children: The role of abstract shape representation Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1