对生物可降解时态基质在复杂伤口重建中的应用进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae081
Payton Kathryn Grande, David Hill, Jenessa McElfresh, Ram Velamuri, Xiangxia Liu
{"title":"对生物可降解时态基质在复杂伤口重建中的应用进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Payton Kathryn Grande, David Hill, Jenessa McElfresh, Ram Velamuri, Xiangxia Liu","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a synthetic dermal template recently developed to reconstruct complex wounds. Current literature describes BTM outcomes in the presence of infection and other comorbidities but is limited by small sample sizes. The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the current breadth and success of BTM use for complex wound closure. Databases were searched to identify previously published studies describing BTM use in human wounds. Studies were excluded if conducted in vitro, using nonhuman animals, or for procedures irrelevant to wound care. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 202 patients. The most common injury treated with BTM was burns (68 cases, 33.7%) followed by acute surgical wounds (59 cases, 29.2%). The large majority of patients did not experience any postoperative infections (76.6%). Infected wounds were associated with a 7.5-day delay from BTM to grafting. Univariate regression analyses showed a negative association between time to BTM implantation and age, exposed muscle, and exposed tendon (p < 0.001). In total 92% of patients received BTM implantation less than 2 weeks from admission. A total of 84% of patients had a greater than 95% BTM take. The median time to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) was 34 days, and 92% of patients experienced a greater than 95% STSG survival. To our knowledge, this is the first reported systemic review on the application of BTM for wound reconstruction. According to the published data, BTM is a versatile dermal template for complex wounds coverage with a low risk of infection, high template take rate, and excellent autograft survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"82-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix Application for Complex Wound Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Payton Kathryn Grande, David Hill, Jenessa McElfresh, Ram Velamuri, Xiangxia Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a synthetic dermal template recently developed to reconstruct complex wounds. Current literature describes BTM outcomes in the presence of infection and other comorbidities but is limited by small sample sizes. The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the current breadth and success of BTM use for complex wound closure. Databases were searched to identify previously published studies describing BTM use in human wounds. Studies were excluded if conducted in vitro, using nonhuman animals, or for procedures irrelevant to wound care. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 202 patients. The most common injury treated with BTM was burns (68 cases, 33.7%) followed by acute surgical wounds (59 cases, 29.2%). The large majority of patients did not experience any postoperative infections (76.6%). Infected wounds were associated with a 7.5-day delay from BTM to grafting. Univariate regression analyses showed a negative association between time to BTM implantation and age, exposed muscle, and exposed tendon (p < 0.001). In total 92% of patients received BTM implantation less than 2 weeks from admission. A total of 84% of patients had a greater than 95% BTM take. The median time to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) was 34 days, and 92% of patients experienced a greater than 95% STSG survival. To our knowledge, this is the first reported systemic review on the application of BTM for wound reconstruction. According to the published data, BTM is a versatile dermal template for complex wounds coverage with a low risk of infection, high template take rate, and excellent autograft survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"82-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物可降解增时基质(BTM)是最近开发的一种合成真皮模板,用于重建复杂伤口。目前的文献介绍了 BTM 在感染和其他并发症情况下的治疗效果,但由于样本量较小而受到限制。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定目前 BTM 用于复杂伤口闭合的广泛性和成功率。我们对数据库进行了检索,以确定以前发表的描述 BTM 在人类伤口中应用的研究。如果研究是在体外进行、使用非人类动物或研究程序与伤口护理无关,则排除在外。符合纳入标准的研究有 24 项,涉及 202 名患者。使用 BTM 治疗的最常见创伤是烧伤(68 例,占 33.7%),其次是急性手术伤口(59 例,占 29.2%)。绝大多数患者没有发生术后感染(76.6%)。感染伤口与从 BTM 到移植延迟 7.5 天有关。单变量回归分析显示,BTM 植入时间与年龄、暴露的肌肉和暴露的肌腱呈负相关(p < 0.001)。92%的患者在入院后不到两周的时间内接受了 BTM 植入。84%的患者 BTM 植入率超过 95%。STSG的中位时间为34天,92%的患者STSG存活率超过95%。据我们所知,这是首次对 BTM 在伤口重建中的应用进行系统回顾。根据已发表的数据,BTM 是用于复杂伤口覆盖的多功能真皮模板,具有感染风险低、模板取材率高、自体移植物存活率高的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix Application for Complex Wound Reconstruction.

Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a synthetic dermal template recently developed to reconstruct complex wounds. Current literature describes BTM outcomes in the presence of infection and other comorbidities but is limited by small sample sizes. The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the current breadth and success of BTM use for complex wound closure. Databases were searched to identify previously published studies describing BTM use in human wounds. Studies were excluded if conducted in vitro, using nonhuman animals, or for procedures irrelevant to wound care. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 202 patients. The most common injury treated with BTM was burns (68 cases, 33.7%) followed by acute surgical wounds (59 cases, 29.2%). The large majority of patients did not experience any postoperative infections (76.6%). Infected wounds were associated with a 7.5-day delay from BTM to grafting. Univariate regression analyses showed a negative association between time to BTM implantation and age, exposed muscle, and exposed tendon (p < 0.001). In total 92% of patients received BTM implantation less than 2 weeks from admission. A total of 84% of patients had a greater than 95% BTM take. The median time to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) was 34 days, and 92% of patients experienced a greater than 95% STSG survival. To our knowledge, this is the first reported systemic review on the application of BTM for wound reconstruction. According to the published data, BTM is a versatile dermal template for complex wounds coverage with a low risk of infection, high template take rate, and excellent autograft survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Burn center versus burn unit, which is better? Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and its Use in Burn Wounds: An Updated Systematic Review. Burn Progression in Human Skin - A Review of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research. Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review. Wildland Firefighters Suffer Increasing Risk of Job-Related Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1