Payton Kathryn Grande, David Hill, Jenessa McElfresh, Ram Velamuri, Xiangxia Liu
{"title":"对生物可降解时态基质在复杂伤口重建中的应用进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Payton Kathryn Grande, David Hill, Jenessa McElfresh, Ram Velamuri, Xiangxia Liu","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a synthetic dermal template recently developed to reconstruct complex wounds. Current literature describes BTM outcomes in the presence of infection and other comorbidities but is limited by small sample sizes. The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the current breadth and success of BTM use for complex wound closure. Databases were searched to identify previously published studies describing BTM use in human wounds. Studies were excluded if conducted in vitro, using nonhuman animals, or for procedures irrelevant to wound care. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 202 patients. The most common injury treated with BTM was burns (68 cases, 33.7%) followed by acute surgical wounds (59 cases, 29.2%). The large majority of patients did not experience any postoperative infections (76.6%). Infected wounds were associated with a 7.5-day delay from BTM to grafting. Univariate regression analyses showed a negative association between time to BTM implantation and age, exposed muscle, and exposed tendon (p < 0.001). In total 92% of patients received BTM implantation less than 2 weeks from admission. A total of 84% of patients had a greater than 95% BTM take. The median time to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) was 34 days, and 92% of patients experienced a greater than 95% STSG survival. To our knowledge, this is the first reported systemic review on the application of BTM for wound reconstruction. According to the published data, BTM is a versatile dermal template for complex wounds coverage with a low risk of infection, high template take rate, and excellent autograft survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"82-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix Application for Complex Wound Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Payton Kathryn Grande, David Hill, Jenessa McElfresh, Ram Velamuri, Xiangxia Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a synthetic dermal template recently developed to reconstruct complex wounds. Current literature describes BTM outcomes in the presence of infection and other comorbidities but is limited by small sample sizes. The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the current breadth and success of BTM use for complex wound closure. Databases were searched to identify previously published studies describing BTM use in human wounds. Studies were excluded if conducted in vitro, using nonhuman animals, or for procedures irrelevant to wound care. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 202 patients. The most common injury treated with BTM was burns (68 cases, 33.7%) followed by acute surgical wounds (59 cases, 29.2%). The large majority of patients did not experience any postoperative infections (76.6%). Infected wounds were associated with a 7.5-day delay from BTM to grafting. Univariate regression analyses showed a negative association between time to BTM implantation and age, exposed muscle, and exposed tendon (p < 0.001). In total 92% of patients received BTM implantation less than 2 weeks from admission. A total of 84% of patients had a greater than 95% BTM take. The median time to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) was 34 days, and 92% of patients experienced a greater than 95% STSG survival. To our knowledge, this is the first reported systemic review on the application of BTM for wound reconstruction. According to the published data, BTM is a versatile dermal template for complex wounds coverage with a low risk of infection, high template take rate, and excellent autograft survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"82-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix Application for Complex Wound Reconstruction.
Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a synthetic dermal template recently developed to reconstruct complex wounds. Current literature describes BTM outcomes in the presence of infection and other comorbidities but is limited by small sample sizes. The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the current breadth and success of BTM use for complex wound closure. Databases were searched to identify previously published studies describing BTM use in human wounds. Studies were excluded if conducted in vitro, using nonhuman animals, or for procedures irrelevant to wound care. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 202 patients. The most common injury treated with BTM was burns (68 cases, 33.7%) followed by acute surgical wounds (59 cases, 29.2%). The large majority of patients did not experience any postoperative infections (76.6%). Infected wounds were associated with a 7.5-day delay from BTM to grafting. Univariate regression analyses showed a negative association between time to BTM implantation and age, exposed muscle, and exposed tendon (p < 0.001). In total 92% of patients received BTM implantation less than 2 weeks from admission. A total of 84% of patients had a greater than 95% BTM take. The median time to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) was 34 days, and 92% of patients experienced a greater than 95% STSG survival. To our knowledge, this is the first reported systemic review on the application of BTM for wound reconstruction. According to the published data, BTM is a versatile dermal template for complex wounds coverage with a low risk of infection, high template take rate, and excellent autograft survival.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.