{"title":"田间包装哈密瓜接触表面的沙门氏菌和李斯特菌存活率。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Field-packing of cantaloupes involves numerous food contact surfaces that can contamination melons with foodborne pathogens; the soil on these surfaces increases throughout the harvest day. Data are lacking on the cross-contamination risk from contaminated food contact surfaces under the dry conditions typical of cantaloupe field-packing operations. This study sought to evaluate the survival of <em>Salmonella</em> and <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> on cantaloupe field-pack food contact surfaces using both a wet and dry inoculum to provide insights into managing foodborne pathogen contamination risks. Five clean or fouled materials (cotton gloves, nitrile gloves, rubber gloves, cotton rags, and stainless steel) were inoculated with a cocktail of either <em>Salmonella</em> or <em>L. monocytogenes</em>. A wet inoculum was spot inoculated (100 µL) onto coupons. A dry inoculum was prepared by mixing wet inoculum with 100 g of sterile sand and shaking the coupons with the inoculated sand for 2 min. Coupons were held at 35°C (35% RH) and enumerated at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h. Significant differences in pathogen concentrations over time were calculated, and the GInaFiT add-in tool for Excel was used to build Log-linear, Weibull, and Biphasic die-off models. Depending on the material type, coupon condition, and inoculum type, <em>Salmonella</em> and <em>L. monocytogenes</em> reductions over 8 h ranged from 0.3 to 3.3 and −0.4 to 4.2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/coupon, respectively. For all material types, <em>Salmonella</em> reductions were highest on wet-inoculated clean coupons; <em>L. monocytogenes</em> varied by material type. Weibull and biphasic models were a better fit of respective pathogen die-off curves than linear models. Overall, faster die-off rates were seen for wet inoculated and clean materials. Since pathogen populations remained viable over the study duration and both inoculum type and coupon condition impacted survival, frequent sanitation or replacement of food contact surfaces during the operational day is needed to reduce the risk of cross-contamination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000838/pdfft?md5=c59a1fb9d3c700d887b313bb810fce37&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000838-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes Survival on Field Packed Cantaloupe Contact Surfaces\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Field-packing of cantaloupes involves numerous food contact surfaces that can contamination melons with foodborne pathogens; the soil on these surfaces increases throughout the harvest day. Data are lacking on the cross-contamination risk from contaminated food contact surfaces under the dry conditions typical of cantaloupe field-packing operations. This study sought to evaluate the survival of <em>Salmonella</em> and <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> on cantaloupe field-pack food contact surfaces using both a wet and dry inoculum to provide insights into managing foodborne pathogen contamination risks. Five clean or fouled materials (cotton gloves, nitrile gloves, rubber gloves, cotton rags, and stainless steel) were inoculated with a cocktail of either <em>Salmonella</em> or <em>L. monocytogenes</em>. A wet inoculum was spot inoculated (100 µL) onto coupons. A dry inoculum was prepared by mixing wet inoculum with 100 g of sterile sand and shaking the coupons with the inoculated sand for 2 min. Coupons were held at 35°C (35% RH) and enumerated at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h. Significant differences in pathogen concentrations over time were calculated, and the GInaFiT add-in tool for Excel was used to build Log-linear, Weibull, and Biphasic die-off models. Depending on the material type, coupon condition, and inoculum type, <em>Salmonella</em> and <em>L. monocytogenes</em> reductions over 8 h ranged from 0.3 to 3.3 and −0.4 to 4.2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/coupon, respectively. For all material types, <em>Salmonella</em> reductions were highest on wet-inoculated clean coupons; <em>L. monocytogenes</em> varied by material type. Weibull and biphasic models were a better fit of respective pathogen die-off curves than linear models. Overall, faster die-off rates were seen for wet inoculated and clean materials. Since pathogen populations remained viable over the study duration and both inoculum type and coupon condition impacted survival, frequent sanitation or replacement of food contact surfaces during the operational day is needed to reduce the risk of cross-contamination.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000838/pdfft?md5=c59a1fb9d3c700d887b313bb810fce37&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24000838-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000838\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24000838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes Survival on Field Packed Cantaloupe Contact Surfaces
Field-packing of cantaloupes involves numerous food contact surfaces that can contamination melons with foodborne pathogens; the soil on these surfaces increases throughout the harvest day. Data are lacking on the cross-contamination risk from contaminated food contact surfaces under the dry conditions typical of cantaloupe field-packing operations. This study sought to evaluate the survival of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes on cantaloupe field-pack food contact surfaces using both a wet and dry inoculum to provide insights into managing foodborne pathogen contamination risks. Five clean or fouled materials (cotton gloves, nitrile gloves, rubber gloves, cotton rags, and stainless steel) were inoculated with a cocktail of either Salmonella or L. monocytogenes. A wet inoculum was spot inoculated (100 µL) onto coupons. A dry inoculum was prepared by mixing wet inoculum with 100 g of sterile sand and shaking the coupons with the inoculated sand for 2 min. Coupons were held at 35°C (35% RH) and enumerated at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h. Significant differences in pathogen concentrations over time were calculated, and the GInaFiT add-in tool for Excel was used to build Log-linear, Weibull, and Biphasic die-off models. Depending on the material type, coupon condition, and inoculum type, Salmonella and L. monocytogenes reductions over 8 h ranged from 0.3 to 3.3 and −0.4 to 4.2 log10 CFU/coupon, respectively. For all material types, Salmonella reductions were highest on wet-inoculated clean coupons; L. monocytogenes varied by material type. Weibull and biphasic models were a better fit of respective pathogen die-off curves than linear models. Overall, faster die-off rates were seen for wet inoculated and clean materials. Since pathogen populations remained viable over the study duration and both inoculum type and coupon condition impacted survival, frequent sanitation or replacement of food contact surfaces during the operational day is needed to reduce the risk of cross-contamination.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.