Charlotte Le Lann , Élodie Drumez , Louise Ghesquiere , Norbert Winer , Vincent Dochez , Émilie Misbert
{"title":"[妊娠36周前胎膜早破的随访方式对潜伏期的影响]。","authors":"Charlotte Le Lann , Élodie Drumez , Louise Ghesquiere , Norbert Winer , Vincent Dochez , Émilie Misbert","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the main cause of premature delivery, complicating 1–3% of all pregnancies. Conventional hospitalization (CH) is the most frequent mode of follow-up, but homecare (HC) seems to be an alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Study of the impact of the monitoring mode on the duration of the latency period and on the latency ratio after PPROM, and analysis of the risk factors modifying this ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a bicentric retrospective cohort study here-abouts including patients who presented a PPROM between 24 and 36<!--> <!-->weeks of gestation from 2016 to 2018. Patients had a follow-up in HC at Lille University Hospital center (UHC) and in CH at Nantes UHC according to two different follow-up protocols. The latency ratio corresponded to the real latency period divided by the latency period to theoretical term.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 154 patients: 102 in HC and 52 in CH. The mean latency period was significantly higher in HC: 36.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->21.8 days, corresponding to an 85.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->23.7% latency ratio versus 20.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12 days, corresponding to an 66.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->29.8% latency ratio in CH (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). The latency ratio in CH was correlated with term at PPROM (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The duration of the latency period seems prolonged for PPROM followed by HC management versus CH in selected populations. This study suggests a benefit to HC in stable patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact du mode de suivi des ruptures prématurées des membranes avant 36 SA sur la durée de latence\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Le Lann , Élodie Drumez , Louise Ghesquiere , Norbert Winer , Vincent Dochez , Émilie Misbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the main cause of premature delivery, complicating 1–3% of all pregnancies. Conventional hospitalization (CH) is the most frequent mode of follow-up, but homecare (HC) seems to be an alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Study of the impact of the monitoring mode on the duration of the latency period and on the latency ratio after PPROM, and analysis of the risk factors modifying this ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a bicentric retrospective cohort study here-abouts including patients who presented a PPROM between 24 and 36<!--> <!-->weeks of gestation from 2016 to 2018. Patients had a follow-up in HC at Lille University Hospital center (UHC) and in CH at Nantes UHC according to two different follow-up protocols. The latency ratio corresponded to the real latency period divided by the latency period to theoretical term.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 154 patients: 102 in HC and 52 in CH. The mean latency period was significantly higher in HC: 36.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->21.8 days, corresponding to an 85.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->23.7% latency ratio versus 20.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12 days, corresponding to an 66.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->29.8% latency ratio in CH (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). The latency ratio in CH was correlated with term at PPROM (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The duration of the latency period seems prolonged for PPROM followed by HC management versus CH in selected populations. This study suggests a benefit to HC in stable patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468718924002095\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468718924002095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言早产胎膜早破(PPROM)是导致早产的主要原因,1%-3%的孕妇会因此并发早产。传统的住院治疗(CH)是最常见的随访方式,但家庭护理(HC)似乎是另一种选择:研究监测模式对早产后潜伏期持续时间和潜伏期比率的影响,并分析改变这一比率的风险因素:这是一项双中心回顾性队列研究,包括2016年至2018年妊娠24周至36周期间出现PPROM的患者。根据两种不同的随访方案,患者分别在里尔大学医院中心(UHC)的HC和南特大学医院中心(UHC)的CH接受随访。潜伏期比率相当于实际潜伏期除以理论足月潜伏期:我们共纳入了154名患者:102名HC患者和52名CH患者。HC患者的平均潜伏期明显更高:36.9±21.8天,潜伏期比率为85.5±23.7%;CH患者的平均潜伏期为20.2±12天,潜伏期比率为66.9±29.8%(P< 0.001)。结论:结论:在特定人群中,PPROM 后进行 HC 管理与 CH 相比,潜伏期的持续时间似乎更长。这项研究表明,在病情稳定的患者中使用 HC 有好处。
Impact du mode de suivi des ruptures prématurées des membranes avant 36 SA sur la durée de latence
Introduction
Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the main cause of premature delivery, complicating 1–3% of all pregnancies. Conventional hospitalization (CH) is the most frequent mode of follow-up, but homecare (HC) seems to be an alternative.
Objectives
Study of the impact of the monitoring mode on the duration of the latency period and on the latency ratio after PPROM, and analysis of the risk factors modifying this ratio.
Methods
This was a bicentric retrospective cohort study here-abouts including patients who presented a PPROM between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation from 2016 to 2018. Patients had a follow-up in HC at Lille University Hospital center (UHC) and in CH at Nantes UHC according to two different follow-up protocols. The latency ratio corresponded to the real latency period divided by the latency period to theoretical term.
Results
We included 154 patients: 102 in HC and 52 in CH. The mean latency period was significantly higher in HC: 36.9 ± 21.8 days, corresponding to an 85.5 ± 23.7% latency ratio versus 20.2 ± 12 days, corresponding to an 66.9 ± 29.8% latency ratio in CH (P < 0.001). The latency ratio in CH was correlated with term at PPROM (P = 0.001).
Conclusions
The duration of the latency period seems prolonged for PPROM followed by HC management versus CH in selected populations. This study suggests a benefit to HC in stable patients.
期刊介绍:
Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…