{"title":"[人造角膜:从开始到未来]。","authors":"Olga Reitblat, Eitan Livny, Irit Bahar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Corneal disease is among the leading reversible causes of blindness worldwide. Corneal transplantation is a successful and curative treatment for most of these cases. However, in certain indications it is not amendable for standard corneal transplantation, the only available option to restore functional vision is keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation. KPros may also offer an alternative to the global shortage of donor corneas, limiting the access to transplantations. However, current KPros face many challenges, including surgical complexity that requires skilled surgeons and vast resources as well as unique surgical and post-operative complications. Although several artificial corneas have been proposed over the years, two implants are mostly used in the clinical setting today. The first, the Boston KPro, consists of a front plate with an optical stem and a back plate snapped together with donor corneal tissue in-between, which is then sutured to the patient's cornea. The second, the Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP), uses biological tissue of the alveolar bone to support an optical cylinder within the eye. The indications, surgical techniques, and complication profile of the two procedures are different and will be discussed in this review. Extensive research continues to improve the accessibility and technological developments of KPros in the search for a potential breakthrough in the treatment of these difficult cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"163 5","pages":"310-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[ARTIFICIAL CORNEA: FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE FUTURE].\",\"authors\":\"Olga Reitblat, Eitan Livny, Irit Bahar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Corneal disease is among the leading reversible causes of blindness worldwide. Corneal transplantation is a successful and curative treatment for most of these cases. However, in certain indications it is not amendable for standard corneal transplantation, the only available option to restore functional vision is keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation. KPros may also offer an alternative to the global shortage of donor corneas, limiting the access to transplantations. However, current KPros face many challenges, including surgical complexity that requires skilled surgeons and vast resources as well as unique surgical and post-operative complications. Although several artificial corneas have been proposed over the years, two implants are mostly used in the clinical setting today. The first, the Boston KPro, consists of a front plate with an optical stem and a back plate snapped together with donor corneal tissue in-between, which is then sutured to the patient's cornea. The second, the Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP), uses biological tissue of the alveolar bone to support an optical cylinder within the eye. The indications, surgical techniques, and complication profile of the two procedures are different and will be discussed in this review. Extensive research continues to improve the accessibility and technological developments of KPros in the search for a potential breakthrough in the treatment of these difficult cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harefuah\",\"volume\":\"163 5\",\"pages\":\"310-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harefuah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[ARTIFICIAL CORNEA: FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE FUTURE].
Introduction: Corneal disease is among the leading reversible causes of blindness worldwide. Corneal transplantation is a successful and curative treatment for most of these cases. However, in certain indications it is not amendable for standard corneal transplantation, the only available option to restore functional vision is keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation. KPros may also offer an alternative to the global shortage of donor corneas, limiting the access to transplantations. However, current KPros face many challenges, including surgical complexity that requires skilled surgeons and vast resources as well as unique surgical and post-operative complications. Although several artificial corneas have been proposed over the years, two implants are mostly used in the clinical setting today. The first, the Boston KPro, consists of a front plate with an optical stem and a back plate snapped together with donor corneal tissue in-between, which is then sutured to the patient's cornea. The second, the Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP), uses biological tissue of the alveolar bone to support an optical cylinder within the eye. The indications, surgical techniques, and complication profile of the two procedures are different and will be discussed in this review. Extensive research continues to improve the accessibility and technological developments of KPros in the search for a potential breakthrough in the treatment of these difficult cases.