这不是为了孩子":对丹麦家长决定为儿童接种流感疫苗的障碍和促进因素的定性调查

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100449
Anna Schneider-Kamp , Gareth Millward , Christine Stabell Benn , Shriram Venkatraman , Maria Sejthen Reiss , Søren Askegaard
{"title":"这不是为了孩子\":对丹麦家长决定为儿童接种流感疫苗的障碍和促进因素的定性调查","authors":"Anna Schneider-Kamp ,&nbsp;Gareth Millward ,&nbsp;Christine Stabell Benn ,&nbsp;Shriram Venkatraman ,&nbsp;Maria Sejthen Reiss ,&nbsp;Søren Askegaard","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recently, the Danish Health Authority began recommending vaccinating children aged 2–6 years against seasonal influenza, underscoring the pivotal role of children in its transmission dynamics within the wider population and the need to protect vulnerable population groups after COVID-19. Under a third followed the recommendation. For the routine Danish childhood vaccine program coverage is usually well above 90%.</p><p>Through a qualitative in-depth study with 28 key informants during the 2022/2023 influenza season, we investigated the barriers and facilitators of parents' decision-making for vaccinating their children against influenza. We found that parents' decision-making was influenced by a range of factors that present barriers or facilitators at the individual or collective levels, depending on personal antecedents and family situations. We also gained insights on how COVID-19 mass vaccination shaped parents’ attitudes and awareness toward influenza vaccination, explaining why many parents who fully complied with the COVID-19 recommendations elected to opt out of influenza.</p><p>The implications of these findings extend beyond the concrete context of parent's decision-making regarding influenza vaccination, contributing to our understanding of vaccine confidence in at least two ways. First, the limited public controversy regarding childhood influenza vaccination allows for a perspective onto low vaccine uptake that does not resort to the usual framing of a well-defined “crisis”. Second, the interaction between COVID-19 vaccination and the childhood influenza vaccination reveals how the massive pressure on parents to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19 contributed to an erosion of vaccine confidence in general.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000581/pdfft?md5=8138fab769a7656bd84e18dfbe0dff34&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000581-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It's not for the children's sake’: A qualitative inquiry into the barriers and facilitators underlying parents' decision-making for vaccinating children against influenza in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Anna Schneider-Kamp ,&nbsp;Gareth Millward ,&nbsp;Christine Stabell Benn ,&nbsp;Shriram Venkatraman ,&nbsp;Maria Sejthen Reiss ,&nbsp;Søren Askegaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recently, the Danish Health Authority began recommending vaccinating children aged 2–6 years against seasonal influenza, underscoring the pivotal role of children in its transmission dynamics within the wider population and the need to protect vulnerable population groups after COVID-19. Under a third followed the recommendation. For the routine Danish childhood vaccine program coverage is usually well above 90%.</p><p>Through a qualitative in-depth study with 28 key informants during the 2022/2023 influenza season, we investigated the barriers and facilitators of parents' decision-making for vaccinating their children against influenza. We found that parents' decision-making was influenced by a range of factors that present barriers or facilitators at the individual or collective levels, depending on personal antecedents and family situations. We also gained insights on how COVID-19 mass vaccination shaped parents’ attitudes and awareness toward influenza vaccination, explaining why many parents who fully complied with the COVID-19 recommendations elected to opt out of influenza.</p><p>The implications of these findings extend beyond the concrete context of parent's decision-making regarding influenza vaccination, contributing to our understanding of vaccine confidence in at least two ways. First, the limited public controversy regarding childhood influenza vaccination allows for a perspective onto low vaccine uptake that does not resort to the usual framing of a well-defined “crisis”. Second, the interaction between COVID-19 vaccination and the childhood influenza vaccination reveals how the massive pressure on parents to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19 contributed to an erosion of vaccine confidence in general.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000581/pdfft?md5=8138fab769a7656bd84e18dfbe0dff34&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000581-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,丹麦卫生局开始建议为 2-6 岁儿童接种季节性流感疫苗,强调了儿童在流感在更广泛人群中的传播动态中的关键作用,以及在 COVID-19 之后保护易感人群的必要性。不到三分之一的人采纳了这一建议。通过在 2022/2023 年流感季节对 28 名关键信息提供者进行深入定性研究,我们调查了家长为其子女接种流感疫苗决策的障碍和促进因素。我们发现,家长的决策受到一系列因素的影响,这些因素在个人或集体层面上构成了障碍或促进因素,具体取决于个人前因和家庭状况。我们还深入了解了 COVID-19 大规模疫苗接种是如何影响家长对流感疫苗接种的态度和认识的,这也解释了为什么许多完全遵守 COVID-19 建议的家长选择不接种流感疫苗。首先,公众对儿童流感疫苗接种的争议有限,这使得我们可以从一个角度来看待疫苗接种率低的问题,而不必像通常那样将其归结为一场定义明确的 "危机"。其次,COVID-19 疫苗接种与儿童流感疫苗接种之间的相互作用揭示了父母为自己和孩子接种 COVID-19 疫苗的巨大压力是如何在总体上削弱疫苗信心的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘It's not for the children's sake’: A qualitative inquiry into the barriers and facilitators underlying parents' decision-making for vaccinating children against influenza in Denmark

Recently, the Danish Health Authority began recommending vaccinating children aged 2–6 years against seasonal influenza, underscoring the pivotal role of children in its transmission dynamics within the wider population and the need to protect vulnerable population groups after COVID-19. Under a third followed the recommendation. For the routine Danish childhood vaccine program coverage is usually well above 90%.

Through a qualitative in-depth study with 28 key informants during the 2022/2023 influenza season, we investigated the barriers and facilitators of parents' decision-making for vaccinating their children against influenza. We found that parents' decision-making was influenced by a range of factors that present barriers or facilitators at the individual or collective levels, depending on personal antecedents and family situations. We also gained insights on how COVID-19 mass vaccination shaped parents’ attitudes and awareness toward influenza vaccination, explaining why many parents who fully complied with the COVID-19 recommendations elected to opt out of influenza.

The implications of these findings extend beyond the concrete context of parent's decision-making regarding influenza vaccination, contributing to our understanding of vaccine confidence in at least two ways. First, the limited public controversy regarding childhood influenza vaccination allows for a perspective onto low vaccine uptake that does not resort to the usual framing of a well-defined “crisis”. Second, the interaction between COVID-19 vaccination and the childhood influenza vaccination reveals how the massive pressure on parents to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19 contributed to an erosion of vaccine confidence in general.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Palestinian physicians on the impact of the Gaza War in the West Bank Prenatal care in urban China: Qualitative study on challenges and coping mechanisms Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities A methodological review of solicited diaries as a qualitative tool in health research in low- and middle-income countries Reconciling market and moral logics on a minimum wage: Supermarket work in Australia during the first two years of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1