利用木质纤维素生物质去除受污染废水中的亚甲基蓝染料:比较研究

Chukwunonso O. Aniagor , A.A. Aly , Laifa.A Mohamed , A. Hashem
{"title":"利用木质纤维素生物质去除受污染废水中的亚甲基蓝染料:比较研究","authors":"Chukwunonso O. Aniagor ,&nbsp;A.A. Aly ,&nbsp;Laifa.A Mohamed ,&nbsp;A. Hashem","doi":"10.1016/j.wmb.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, lupine seed (Lu-SP) and pumpkin seed shells (PSSP) biomasses were used to create alternative and effective adsorbents. Methylene blue (MB) dye was removed from wastewater using the as-prepared adsorbents at variables solution pH 2.0 –11.0, contact period (0–180 min), and adsorbent mass (0.2–2.0 g/L). The solution pH had a synergistic effect on the improved removal of MB and the optimal adsorption removal for both adsorbents occurred at pH 8.0 and 120 min. The adsorption isotherm modelling results showed a good fit with the Langmuir model, with a maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of 48.98 and 77.48 mg/g for PSSP and Lu-SP, respectively. Similarly, the pseudo-first-order (PFO) model is regarded as the best-fit kinetic model for both adsorbents and suggests the predominance of physisorption via interfacial diffusion. Mechanistic investigation of the present system suggests that both intraparticle diffusion and surface sorption mechanisms control the adsorption rate. Notably, the Lu-SP with a lower surface area (54.013 m<sup>2</sup>/g) outperformed the PSSP (235.992 m<sup>2</sup>/g) in terms of adsorption capacity under varying pH. Therefore, in addition to electrostatic interaction, adsorption into the micropores via volume filling is considered one of the adsorption mechanisms. This study, therefore, revealed that the PSSP and Lu-SP may be very helpful for removing cationic MB dye from contaminated wastewater.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101276,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management Bulletin","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 213-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750724000403/pdfft?md5=6738746ccc7b167e7f68b0995260e71a&pid=1-s2.0-S2949750724000403-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of Methylene blue dye from contaminated wastewater using lignocellulosic biomasses: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Chukwunonso O. Aniagor ,&nbsp;A.A. Aly ,&nbsp;Laifa.A Mohamed ,&nbsp;A. Hashem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wmb.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, lupine seed (Lu-SP) and pumpkin seed shells (PSSP) biomasses were used to create alternative and effective adsorbents. Methylene blue (MB) dye was removed from wastewater using the as-prepared adsorbents at variables solution pH 2.0 –11.0, contact period (0–180 min), and adsorbent mass (0.2–2.0 g/L). The solution pH had a synergistic effect on the improved removal of MB and the optimal adsorption removal for both adsorbents occurred at pH 8.0 and 120 min. The adsorption isotherm modelling results showed a good fit with the Langmuir model, with a maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of 48.98 and 77.48 mg/g for PSSP and Lu-SP, respectively. Similarly, the pseudo-first-order (PFO) model is regarded as the best-fit kinetic model for both adsorbents and suggests the predominance of physisorption via interfacial diffusion. Mechanistic investigation of the present system suggests that both intraparticle diffusion and surface sorption mechanisms control the adsorption rate. Notably, the Lu-SP with a lower surface area (54.013 m<sup>2</sup>/g) outperformed the PSSP (235.992 m<sup>2</sup>/g) in terms of adsorption capacity under varying pH. Therefore, in addition to electrostatic interaction, adsorption into the micropores via volume filling is considered one of the adsorption mechanisms. This study, therefore, revealed that the PSSP and Lu-SP may be very helpful for removing cationic MB dye from contaminated wastewater.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste Management Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 213-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750724000403/pdfft?md5=6738746ccc7b167e7f68b0995260e71a&pid=1-s2.0-S2949750724000403-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste Management Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750724000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750724000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,羽扇豆种子(Lu-SP)和南瓜籽壳(PSSP)生物质被用来制造替代性的有效吸附剂。在不同的溶液 pH 值(2.0 -11.0)、接触时间(0-180 分钟)和吸附剂质量(0.2-2.0 克/升)条件下,使用制备的吸附剂去除废水中的亚甲基蓝(MB)染料。溶液 pH 值对提高甲基溴的去除率有协同作用,两种吸附剂的最佳吸附去除率都出现在 pH 值为 8.0 和 120 分钟时。吸附等温线模型结果显示与 Langmuir 模型拟合良好,PSSP 和 Lu-SP 的最大单层吸附容量分别为 48.98 和 77.48 mg/g。同样,伪一阶(PFO)模型被认为是两种吸附剂的最佳拟合动力学模型,表明通过界面扩散的物理吸附占主导地位。本系统的机理研究表明,颗粒内扩散和表面吸附机制都控制着吸附速率。值得注意的是,在不同的 pH 值条件下,表面积较小(54.013 m2/g)的 Lu-SP 的吸附能力优于 PSSP(235.992 m2/g)。因此,除了静电作用外,通过体积填充吸附到微孔中也被认为是吸附机制之一。因此,这项研究表明,PSSP 和 Lu-SP 可能非常有助于去除受污染废水中的阳离子甲基溴染料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Removal of Methylene blue dye from contaminated wastewater using lignocellulosic biomasses: A comparative study

In this study, lupine seed (Lu-SP) and pumpkin seed shells (PSSP) biomasses were used to create alternative and effective adsorbents. Methylene blue (MB) dye was removed from wastewater using the as-prepared adsorbents at variables solution pH 2.0 –11.0, contact period (0–180 min), and adsorbent mass (0.2–2.0 g/L). The solution pH had a synergistic effect on the improved removal of MB and the optimal adsorption removal for both adsorbents occurred at pH 8.0 and 120 min. The adsorption isotherm modelling results showed a good fit with the Langmuir model, with a maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of 48.98 and 77.48 mg/g for PSSP and Lu-SP, respectively. Similarly, the pseudo-first-order (PFO) model is regarded as the best-fit kinetic model for both adsorbents and suggests the predominance of physisorption via interfacial diffusion. Mechanistic investigation of the present system suggests that both intraparticle diffusion and surface sorption mechanisms control the adsorption rate. Notably, the Lu-SP with a lower surface area (54.013 m2/g) outperformed the PSSP (235.992 m2/g) in terms of adsorption capacity under varying pH. Therefore, in addition to electrostatic interaction, adsorption into the micropores via volume filling is considered one of the adsorption mechanisms. This study, therefore, revealed that the PSSP and Lu-SP may be very helpful for removing cationic MB dye from contaminated wastewater.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rapid on-site maturity and stability assessment of sewage sludge compost by mathematical treatment of UV and fluorescence spectroscopic data Profiling PBDE emissions from coastal landfills: Impact of waste management practices Sustainable recovery of rare Earth elements from industrial waste: A path to circular economy and environmental health Two inorganic materials were prepared by calcination-acid leaching combined treatment of coal gangue: Al&Fe enriched acid solution and Si enriched material A novel Hausdorff fractional grey Bernoulli model and its Application in forecasting electronic waste
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1