日本儿科中重度特应性皮炎患者在使用杜比鲁单抗的同时外用皮质类固醇激素的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期研究。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Allergology International Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.alit.2024.04.006
{"title":"日本儿科中重度特应性皮炎患者在使用杜比鲁单抗的同时外用皮质类固醇激素的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.alit.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We investigated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to &lt;18 years old with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled with existing therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients received dupilumab (n = 30) or placebo (n = 32) with concomitant topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks, then all patients received dupilumab from 16 to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline (EASI-75) to Week 16. Key secondary endpoints included changes in EASI score, proportion of patients with investigator global assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1, and changes in worst daily itch numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (evaluated in patients aged ≥6 to &lt;12 years [n = 35]).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At Week 16, more patients achieved EASI-75 with dupilumab than placebo (43.3% vs 18.8%; P = 0.0304), and the least squares mean (LSM) difference in percent change in EASI scores at Week 16 of dupilumab vs placebo was –39.4% (P = 0.0003). However, no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving IGA scores of 0/1 at Week 16 with dupilumab versus placebo were seen (10.0% vs 9.4%; P = 0.8476). The percent change in worst daily itch NRS scores at Week 16 was higher with dupilumab (LSM difference: –33.3%; nominal P = 0.0117). Dupilumab was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Dupilumab showed consistent efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to &lt;18 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis previously insufficiently controlled with existing therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48861,"journal":{"name":"Allergology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893024000509/pdfft?md5=e2e8a5fa01e194145fb4bc9426f73c8c&pid=1-s2.0-S1323893024000509-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in Japanese pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.alit.2024.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We investigated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to &lt;18 years old with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled with existing therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients received dupilumab (n = 30) or placebo (n = 32) with concomitant topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks, then all patients received dupilumab from 16 to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline (EASI-75) to Week 16. Key secondary endpoints included changes in EASI score, proportion of patients with investigator global assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1, and changes in worst daily itch numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (evaluated in patients aged ≥6 to &lt;12 years [n = 35]).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At Week 16, more patients achieved EASI-75 with dupilumab than placebo (43.3% vs 18.8%; P = 0.0304), and the least squares mean (LSM) difference in percent change in EASI scores at Week 16 of dupilumab vs placebo was –39.4% (P = 0.0003). However, no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving IGA scores of 0/1 at Week 16 with dupilumab versus placebo were seen (10.0% vs 9.4%; P = 0.8476). The percent change in worst daily itch NRS scores at Week 16 was higher with dupilumab (LSM difference: –33.3%; nominal P = 0.0117). Dupilumab was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Dupilumab showed consistent efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to &lt;18 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis previously insufficiently controlled with existing therapies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893024000509/pdfft?md5=e2e8a5fa01e194145fb4bc9426f73c8c&pid=1-s2.0-S1323893024000509-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893024000509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893024000509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们在年龄≥6个月的日本患者中研究了dupilumab的疗效和安全性:在这项随机、双盲、3 期研究中,患者接受杜比鲁单抗(30 例)或安慰剂(32 例)治疗 16 周,同时使用局部皮质类固醇激素,然后所有患者接受杜比鲁单抗治疗 16 至 52 周。主要终点是湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)评分从基线(EASI-75)到第16周改善≥75%的患者比例。主要次要终点包括 EASI 评分的变化、研究者总体评估 (IGA) 得分为 0/1 的患者比例以及最严重日痒数字评分量表 (NRS) 评分的变化(在年龄≥6 岁的患者中进行评估):第16周时,使用dupilumab达到EASI-75的患者多于安慰剂(43.3% vs 18.8%;P = 0.0304),第16周时,dupilumab与安慰剂的EASI评分变化百分比的最小平方均值(LSM)差异为-39.4%(P = 0.0003)。不过,在第16周时,使用dupilumab与安慰剂相比,IGA评分达到0/1的患者比例没有明显差异(10.0% vs 9.4%; P = 0.8476)。在第16周时,使用杜匹单抗的患者每日最严重瘙痒NRS评分变化百分比更高(LSM差异:-33.3%;名义P = 0.0117)。杜比鲁单抗的耐受性良好,未发现新的安全信号:杜匹鲁单抗对年龄≥6个月至以下的日本患者具有一致的疗效和良好的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in Japanese pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study

Background

We investigated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years old with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled with existing therapies.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients received dupilumab (n = 30) or placebo (n = 32) with concomitant topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks, then all patients received dupilumab from 16 to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline (EASI-75) to Week 16. Key secondary endpoints included changes in EASI score, proportion of patients with investigator global assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1, and changes in worst daily itch numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (evaluated in patients aged ≥6 to <12 years [n = 35]).

Results

At Week 16, more patients achieved EASI-75 with dupilumab than placebo (43.3% vs 18.8%; P = 0.0304), and the least squares mean (LSM) difference in percent change in EASI scores at Week 16 of dupilumab vs placebo was –39.4% (P = 0.0003). However, no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving IGA scores of 0/1 at Week 16 with dupilumab versus placebo were seen (10.0% vs 9.4%; P = 0.8476). The percent change in worst daily itch NRS scores at Week 16 was higher with dupilumab (LSM difference: –33.3%; nominal P = 0.0117). Dupilumab was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified.

Conclusions

Dupilumab showed consistent efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis previously insufficiently controlled with existing therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Allergology International
Allergology International ALLERGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergology International is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology and publishes original papers dealing with the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of allergic and related diseases. Papers may include the study of methods of controlling allergic reactions, human and animal models of hypersensitivity and other aspects of basic and applied clinical allergy in its broadest sense. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and encourages authors from all countries to submit papers in the following three categories: Original Articles, Review Articles, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Follicular T cells and the control of IgE responses. Management of severe asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study using a Japanese database. Skin health survey on atopic dermatitis among Japanese children: The Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study. Critical pathomechanisms of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) clarified by treatment with omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody. Reliability of image-based morphometry of the bronchial tree.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1