中低收入国家甲状腺细针穿刺活检的效果。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1159/000539153
Wilhelmina Conradie, Karin Baatjes, Thifhelimbilu Luvhengo, Johannes Buitendag, Rubina Razack, John Davies, Fabio Crabbia, Amir Afrogheh, Jeanne Lübbe
{"title":"中低收入国家甲状腺细针穿刺活检的效果。","authors":"Wilhelmina Conradie, Karin Baatjes, Thifhelimbilu Luvhengo, Johannes Buitendag, Rubina Razack, John Davies, Fabio Crabbia, Amir Afrogheh, Jeanne Lübbe","doi":"10.1159/000539153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 6 categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) with associated risk of malignancy (ROM) provide evidence-based clinical management guidelines. This study aimed to determine the ROM and accuracy of FNAB in South Africa (SA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thyroid specimens from 3 pathology laboratories registered between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for inclusion. ROM was obtained per TBSRTC category by cytohistological correlation and dividing the total number of specimens with malignant histology by the total number of cases operated. Accuracy was calculated based on the Bethesda category and eventual malignant histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen thousand seven hundred and seventy-three histology and 4,791 cytology cases were identified. Of the 4,791 cytology cases, 931 (19%) underwent surgery. More than a third (333, 35.8%) of cases were confirmed as malignant following histological assessment, with the majority being benign (584, 62.7%). The ROM for the nondiagnostic and benign categories was 24.3% and 20.5%. The highest ROM was for category VI (91.5%), followed by categories V (69.5%), IV (51.9%), and III (38.8%). Thyroid FNAB had a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 74%, and overall accuracy of 74%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bethesda categories II and IV have a relatively higher ROM in SA compared to findings from other developed countries. The diagnostic accuracy of thyroid FNAB in SA and the high rate of nondiagnostic diagnoses (38%) require further investigation. A national thyroid registry could provide location-specific data to aid the implementation of appropriate local policies and national guidelines for practicing thyroid surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in a Low- and Middle-Income Country.\",\"authors\":\"Wilhelmina Conradie, Karin Baatjes, Thifhelimbilu Luvhengo, Johannes Buitendag, Rubina Razack, John Davies, Fabio Crabbia, Amir Afrogheh, Jeanne Lübbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 6 categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) with associated risk of malignancy (ROM) provide evidence-based clinical management guidelines. This study aimed to determine the ROM and accuracy of FNAB in South Africa (SA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thyroid specimens from 3 pathology laboratories registered between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for inclusion. ROM was obtained per TBSRTC category by cytohistological correlation and dividing the total number of specimens with malignant histology by the total number of cases operated. Accuracy was calculated based on the Bethesda category and eventual malignant histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen thousand seven hundred and seventy-three histology and 4,791 cytology cases were identified. Of the 4,791 cytology cases, 931 (19%) underwent surgery. More than a third (333, 35.8%) of cases were confirmed as malignant following histological assessment, with the majority being benign (584, 62.7%). The ROM for the nondiagnostic and benign categories was 24.3% and 20.5%. The highest ROM was for category VI (91.5%), followed by categories V (69.5%), IV (51.9%), and III (38.8%). Thyroid FNAB had a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 74%, and overall accuracy of 74%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bethesda categories II and IV have a relatively higher ROM in SA compared to findings from other developed countries. The diagnostic accuracy of thyroid FNAB in SA and the high rate of nondiagnostic diagnoses (38%) require further investigation. A national thyroid registry could provide location-specific data to aid the implementation of appropriate local policies and national guidelines for practicing thyroid surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539153\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞学报告系统(TBSRTC)的6个类别及相关恶性风险(ROM)提供了循证临床管理指南。本研究旨在确定南非(SA)FNAB的ROM和准确性。方法 2015年1月至2019年12月期间注册的3家病理实验室的甲状腺标本被考虑纳入研究范围。通过细胞组织学相关性,并将恶性组织学标本总数除以手术病例总数,得出每个 TBSRTC 类别的 ROM。根据贝塞斯达分类和最终恶性组织学计算准确率。结果 确定了 1.773 万例组织学病例和 4 791 例细胞学病例。在 4 791 例细胞学病例中,931 例(19%)接受了手术。超过三分之一的病例(333 例,占 35.8%)在组织学评估后被证实为恶性肿瘤,大部分为良性肿瘤(584 例,占 62.7%)。非诊断类和良性类的ROM分别为24.3%和20.5%。ROM最高的是VI类(91.5%),其次是V类(69.5%)、IV类(51.9%)和III类(38.8%)。甲状腺 FNAB 的敏感性为 73%,特异性为 74%,总体准确率为 74%。结论 与其他发达国家的研究结果相比,南非的贝塞斯达II类和IV类甲状腺肿的ROM相对较高。南澳大利亚州甲状腺FNAB的诊断准确率和高非诊断率(38%)需要进一步研究。国家甲状腺登记处可以提供特定地区的数据,帮助甲状腺外科医生实施适当的地方政策和国家指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in a Low- and Middle-Income Country.

Introduction: The 6 categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) with associated risk of malignancy (ROM) provide evidence-based clinical management guidelines. This study aimed to determine the ROM and accuracy of FNAB in South Africa (SA).

Methods: Thyroid specimens from 3 pathology laboratories registered between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for inclusion. ROM was obtained per TBSRTC category by cytohistological correlation and dividing the total number of specimens with malignant histology by the total number of cases operated. Accuracy was calculated based on the Bethesda category and eventual malignant histology.

Results: Seventeen thousand seven hundred and seventy-three histology and 4,791 cytology cases were identified. Of the 4,791 cytology cases, 931 (19%) underwent surgery. More than a third (333, 35.8%) of cases were confirmed as malignant following histological assessment, with the majority being benign (584, 62.7%). The ROM for the nondiagnostic and benign categories was 24.3% and 20.5%. The highest ROM was for category VI (91.5%), followed by categories V (69.5%), IV (51.9%), and III (38.8%). Thyroid FNAB had a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 74%, and overall accuracy of 74%.

Conclusion: Bethesda categories II and IV have a relatively higher ROM in SA compared to findings from other developed countries. The diagnostic accuracy of thyroid FNAB in SA and the high rate of nondiagnostic diagnoses (38%) require further investigation. A national thyroid registry could provide location-specific data to aid the implementation of appropriate local policies and national guidelines for practicing thyroid surgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Pipet Curet cytology and biopsy as a diagnostic method for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Adequacy assessment in lymph node aspirates - an exploratory cytomorphologic analysis of negative cervical node aspirates of head and neck carcinomas. Utility of EUS‑FNA in a paediatric population; A single centre experience. Diagnostic Accuracy of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Respiratory Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Xylene-Free Papanicolaou Staining.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1