运动想象练习对带有注意力焦点线索的瞄准任务的影响

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-12 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2024.2350721
Masahiro Yamada, Amanda D Barclift, Louisa D Raisbeck
{"title":"运动想象练习对带有注意力焦点线索的瞄准任务的影响","authors":"Masahiro Yamada, Amanda D Barclift, Louisa D Raisbeck","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2024.2350721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When one directs their attention to an intended effect (external focus of attention, EFOA), motor performance is generally better than when one directs their attention to their own body movements (internal focus of attention, IFOA). However, the effect of attentional focus is unclear when a skill is practiced through motor imagery (MI) in the absence of physical trials. Participants (<i>N</i> = 30, <i>M</i> = 22.33 yrs, <i>SD</i> = 2.69) in the present study completed three physical trials of a reciprocal aiming task before and (24-h) after MI practice. During MI practice, the EFOA (<i>n</i> = 15) and IFOA (<i>n</i> = 15) groups mentally practiced the task with no physical practice with EFOA-MI or IFOA-MI, respectively, for three consecutive days. Our results showed that both groups significantly improved in accuracy (<i>F<sub>1,28</sub></i> = 6.49, <i>p</i> = .017), supporting the benefit of MI in motor skill acquisition. However, a significant effect of attentional focus was not observed (<i>F<sub>1.,28</sub></i> = 0.445, <i>p</i> = 0.51). We discussed two potential explanations: EFOA/IFOA requires physical trials to affect performance, or individuals must use both EFOA and IFOA in the process of creating imagery of the environment and movements, which may obscure the effect of EFOA and IFOA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Motor Imagery Practice on an Aiming Task with Attentional Focus Cues.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Yamada, Amanda D Barclift, Louisa D Raisbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00222895.2024.2350721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When one directs their attention to an intended effect (external focus of attention, EFOA), motor performance is generally better than when one directs their attention to their own body movements (internal focus of attention, IFOA). However, the effect of attentional focus is unclear when a skill is practiced through motor imagery (MI) in the absence of physical trials. Participants (<i>N</i> = 30, <i>M</i> = 22.33 yrs, <i>SD</i> = 2.69) in the present study completed three physical trials of a reciprocal aiming task before and (24-h) after MI practice. During MI practice, the EFOA (<i>n</i> = 15) and IFOA (<i>n</i> = 15) groups mentally practiced the task with no physical practice with EFOA-MI or IFOA-MI, respectively, for three consecutive days. Our results showed that both groups significantly improved in accuracy (<i>F<sub>1,28</sub></i> = 6.49, <i>p</i> = .017), supporting the benefit of MI in motor skill acquisition. However, a significant effect of attentional focus was not observed (<i>F<sub>1.,28</sub></i> = 0.445, <i>p</i> = 0.51). We discussed two potential explanations: EFOA/IFOA requires physical trials to affect performance, or individuals must use both EFOA and IFOA in the process of creating imagery of the environment and movements, which may obscure the effect of EFOA and IFOA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Motor Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Motor Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2024.2350721\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2024.2350721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当一个人将注意力集中于预期效果(外部注意力集中,EFOA)时,其运动表现通常优于将注意力集中于自身肢体动作(内部注意力集中,IFOA)时。然而,在没有身体试验的情况下,通过运动想象(MI)练习一项技能时,注意力集中的效果并不明确。本研究的参与者(N = 30,M = 22.33 岁,SD = 2.69)在运动想象练习之前和之后(24 小时)完成了三次相互瞄准任务的物理试验。在多元智能练习期间,EFOA 组(n = 15)和 IFOA 组(n = 15)分别连续三天在 EFOA-MI 或 IFOA-MI 不进行身体练习的情况下进行心理练习。结果表明,两组的准确率都有明显提高(F1,28 = 6.49,P = .017),这证明了智力练习对运动技能学习的益处。然而,我们没有观察到注意力集中的明显效果(F1,28 = 0.445, p = 0.51)。我们讨论了两种可能的解释:EFOA/IFOA需要物理试验来影响表现,或者个体在对环境和动作进行想象的过程中必须同时使用EFOA和IFOA,这可能会掩盖EFOA和IFOA的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Motor Imagery Practice on an Aiming Task with Attentional Focus Cues.

When one directs their attention to an intended effect (external focus of attention, EFOA), motor performance is generally better than when one directs their attention to their own body movements (internal focus of attention, IFOA). However, the effect of attentional focus is unclear when a skill is practiced through motor imagery (MI) in the absence of physical trials. Participants (N = 30, M = 22.33 yrs, SD = 2.69) in the present study completed three physical trials of a reciprocal aiming task before and (24-h) after MI practice. During MI practice, the EFOA (n = 15) and IFOA (n = 15) groups mentally practiced the task with no physical practice with EFOA-MI or IFOA-MI, respectively, for three consecutive days. Our results showed that both groups significantly improved in accuracy (F1,28 = 6.49, p = .017), supporting the benefit of MI in motor skill acquisition. However, a significant effect of attentional focus was not observed (F1.,28 = 0.445, p = 0.51). We discussed two potential explanations: EFOA/IFOA requires physical trials to affect performance, or individuals must use both EFOA and IFOA in the process of creating imagery of the environment and movements, which may obscure the effect of EFOA and IFOA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Development of an Effector-Specific Stop Signal Task with Higher Complexity: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Age-Related Development of Bilateral Coordination of the Upper Limbs in Children and Adolescents. Inter-Digit Low Level Force Coordination in a Complex Isometric Pinch Tracking Task Effects of External Pacing Type on the Cross-Education of Motor Skill. Eye Movement Differences in Contact Versus Non-Contact Olympic Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1