铜绿假单胞菌体外猪角膜炎模型对常用抗生素的耐受性增强。

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Microbiology-Sgm Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1099/mic.0.001459
Katarzyna Okurowska, Peter N Monk, Esther Karunakaran
{"title":"铜绿假单胞菌体外猪角膜炎模型对常用抗生素的耐受性增强。","authors":"Katarzyna Okurowska, Peter N Monk, Esther Karunakaran","doi":"10.1099/mic.0.001459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>. Bacterial keratitis, particularly caused by <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, is challenging to treat because of multi-drug tolerance, often associated with the formation of biofilms. Antibiotics in development are typically evaluated against planktonic bacteria in a culture medium, which may not accurately represent the complexity of infections <i>in vivo</i>.<b>Hypothesis/Gap Statement.</b> Developing a reliable, economic <i>ex vivo</i> keratitis model that replicates some complexity of tissue infections could facilitate a deeper understanding of antibiotic efficacy, thus aiding in the optimization of treatment strategies for bacterial keratitis.<b>Methodology</b>. Here we investigated the efficacy of three commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and meropenem) against <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> cytotoxic strain PA14 and invasive strain PA01 using an <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model.<b>Results</b>. Both strains of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were susceptible to the MIC of the three tested antibiotics. However, significantly higher concentrations were necessary to inhibit bacterial growth in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) assay, with both strains tolerating concentrations greater than 512 mg l<sup>-1</sup> of meropenem. When MIC and higher concentrations than MBEC (1024 mg l<sup>-1</sup>) of antibiotics were applied, ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest potency against both <i>P. aeruginosa</i> strains, followed by meropenem, while gentamicin showed the least potency. Despite this, none of the antibiotic concentrations used effectively cleared the infection, even after 18 h of continuous exposure.<b>Conclusions.</b> Further exploration of antibiotic concentrations and aligning dosing with clinical studies to validate the model is needed. Nonetheless, our <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model could be a valuable tool for assessing antibiotic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49819,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology-Sgm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased tolerance to commonly used antibiotics in a <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Okurowska, Peter N Monk, Esther Karunakaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/mic.0.001459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>. Bacterial keratitis, particularly caused by <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, is challenging to treat because of multi-drug tolerance, often associated with the formation of biofilms. Antibiotics in development are typically evaluated against planktonic bacteria in a culture medium, which may not accurately represent the complexity of infections <i>in vivo</i>.<b>Hypothesis/Gap Statement.</b> Developing a reliable, economic <i>ex vivo</i> keratitis model that replicates some complexity of tissue infections could facilitate a deeper understanding of antibiotic efficacy, thus aiding in the optimization of treatment strategies for bacterial keratitis.<b>Methodology</b>. Here we investigated the efficacy of three commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and meropenem) against <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> cytotoxic strain PA14 and invasive strain PA01 using an <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model.<b>Results</b>. Both strains of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were susceptible to the MIC of the three tested antibiotics. However, significantly higher concentrations were necessary to inhibit bacterial growth in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) assay, with both strains tolerating concentrations greater than 512 mg l<sup>-1</sup> of meropenem. When MIC and higher concentrations than MBEC (1024 mg l<sup>-1</sup>) of antibiotics were applied, ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest potency against both <i>P. aeruginosa</i> strains, followed by meropenem, while gentamicin showed the least potency. Despite this, none of the antibiotic concentrations used effectively cleared the infection, even after 18 h of continuous exposure.<b>Conclusions.</b> Further exploration of antibiotic concentrations and aligning dosing with clinical studies to validate the model is needed. Nonetheless, our <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model could be a valuable tool for assessing antibiotic efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology-Sgm\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology-Sgm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology-Sgm","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。细菌性角膜炎,尤其是由铜绿假单胞菌引起的细菌性角膜炎,由于对多种药物的耐受性,往往与生物膜的形成有关,因此治疗具有挑战性。开发中的抗生素通常是针对培养基中的浮游细菌进行评估,这可能无法准确反映体内感染的复杂性。开发一种可靠、经济的体外角膜炎模型,复制组织感染的某些复杂性,有助于深入了解抗生素的疗效,从而帮助优化细菌性角膜炎的治疗策略。在此,我们利用猪角膜炎体外模型研究了三种常用抗生素(庆大霉素、环丙沙星和美罗培南)对铜绿假单胞菌细胞毒性菌株 PA14 和侵袭性菌株 PA01 的疗效。两株铜绿假单胞菌对三种测试抗生素的 MIC 均敏感。然而,在最小生物膜根除浓度(MBEC)试验中,抑制细菌生长所需的浓度明显更高,两株菌株都能耐受浓度高于 512 毫克升/升的美罗培南。当抗生素的 MIC 和浓度高于 MBEC(1024 毫克/升)时,环丙沙星对两种铜绿假单胞菌菌株的效力最高,其次是美罗培南,而庆大霉素的效力最低。尽管如此,所使用的抗生素浓度都不能有效清除感染,即使在连续接触 18 小时后也是如此。需要进一步探讨抗生素浓度,并根据临床研究调整剂量,以验证模型。尽管如此,我们的体外猪角膜炎模型仍可作为评估抗生素疗效的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increased tolerance to commonly used antibiotics in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa ex vivo porcine keratitis model.

Introduction. Bacterial keratitis, particularly caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is challenging to treat because of multi-drug tolerance, often associated with the formation of biofilms. Antibiotics in development are typically evaluated against planktonic bacteria in a culture medium, which may not accurately represent the complexity of infections in vivo.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Developing a reliable, economic ex vivo keratitis model that replicates some complexity of tissue infections could facilitate a deeper understanding of antibiotic efficacy, thus aiding in the optimization of treatment strategies for bacterial keratitis.Methodology. Here we investigated the efficacy of three commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and meropenem) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa cytotoxic strain PA14 and invasive strain PA01 using an ex vivo porcine keratitis model.Results. Both strains of P. aeruginosa were susceptible to the MIC of the three tested antibiotics. However, significantly higher concentrations were necessary to inhibit bacterial growth in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) assay, with both strains tolerating concentrations greater than 512 mg l-1 of meropenem. When MIC and higher concentrations than MBEC (1024 mg l-1) of antibiotics were applied, ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest potency against both P. aeruginosa strains, followed by meropenem, while gentamicin showed the least potency. Despite this, none of the antibiotic concentrations used effectively cleared the infection, even after 18 h of continuous exposure.Conclusions. Further exploration of antibiotic concentrations and aligning dosing with clinical studies to validate the model is needed. Nonetheless, our ex vivo porcine keratitis model could be a valuable tool for assessing antibiotic efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology-Sgm
Microbiology-Sgm 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: We publish high-quality original research on bacteria, fungi, protists, archaea, algae, parasites and other microscopic life forms. Topics include but are not limited to: Antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance Bacteriology and parasitology Biochemistry and biophysics Biofilms and biological systems Biotechnology and bioremediation Cell biology and signalling Chemical biology Cross-disciplinary work Ecology and environmental microbiology Food microbiology Genetics Host–microbe interactions Microbial methods and techniques Microscopy and imaging Omics, including genomics, proteomics and metabolomics Physiology and metabolism Systems biology and synthetic biology The microbiome.
期刊最新文献
Microbial Primer: Phase variation - survival and adaptability by generation of a diverse population. Mutations in the efflux regulator gene oqxR provide a simple genetic switch for antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Queuosine salvage in Bartonella henselae Houston 1: a unique evolutionary path. A comparative genomic and phenotypic study of Vibrio cholerae model strains using hybrid sequencing. Characterizing a stable five-species microbial community for use in experimental evolution and ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1