以色列北部一家转诊中心的经静脉抽取铅结果。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-01
Rabea Haddad, Edo Birati, Hiba Zayyad, Nizar Andria, Eyal Nachum, Erez Kachel, Ibrahim Marai
{"title":"以色列北部一家转诊中心的经静脉抽取铅结果。","authors":"Rabea Haddad, Edo Birati, Hiba Zayyad, Nizar Andria, Eyal Nachum, Erez Kachel, Ibrahim Marai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasingly being used; thus, there is an increasing need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize our experience with TLE at single referral center in northern Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included all patients who underwent TLE at our center between 2019 and 2022, regardless of the indication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 50 patients. The mean age was 69 ± 10.36 years; 78% were males. A total of 99 electrodes were targeted. The mean number of electrodes was 1.96 (range 1-4) per patient. The time between lead implantation and extraction ranged between 1.1 and 34 years with an average of 8.14 ± 5.71 years (median of 7.5 years). Complete lead removal was achieved in 98% of patients and in 98.99% of leads. The complete procedural success rate as well as the clinical procedural success rate was 96%. The procedural failure rate was 4% (1 patient died 2 days after the index procedure and 1 patient remained with large portion of lead). The indication for TLE was infection in 78% of the cohort group. Powered mechanical sheaths were used in 36 patients (72%), laser sheaths in 27 (54%), and a combination of laser and mechanical sheaths in 16 (32%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical and procedural success rates of TLE, primarily for CEID-related infection, were high. A combination of laser and mechanical sheaths was needed in one-third of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":"26 5","pages":"273-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in a Referral Center in Northern Israel.\",\"authors\":\"Rabea Haddad, Edo Birati, Hiba Zayyad, Nizar Andria, Eyal Nachum, Erez Kachel, Ibrahim Marai\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasingly being used; thus, there is an increasing need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize our experience with TLE at single referral center in northern Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included all patients who underwent TLE at our center between 2019 and 2022, regardless of the indication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 50 patients. The mean age was 69 ± 10.36 years; 78% were males. A total of 99 electrodes were targeted. The mean number of electrodes was 1.96 (range 1-4) per patient. The time between lead implantation and extraction ranged between 1.1 and 34 years with an average of 8.14 ± 5.71 years (median of 7.5 years). Complete lead removal was achieved in 98% of patients and in 98.99% of leads. The complete procedural success rate as well as the clinical procedural success rate was 96%. The procedural failure rate was 4% (1 patient died 2 days after the index procedure and 1 patient remained with large portion of lead). The indication for TLE was infection in 78% of the cohort group. Powered mechanical sheaths were used in 36 patients (72%), laser sheaths in 27 (54%), and a combination of laser and mechanical sheaths in 16 (32%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical and procedural success rates of TLE, primarily for CEID-related infection, were high. A combination of laser and mechanical sheaths was needed in one-third of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"273-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)的使用越来越广泛,因此,经静脉导联取出术(TLE)的需求也越来越大:总结以色列北部单一转诊中心的 TLE 经验:研究包括 2019 年至 2022 年期间在本中心接受 TLE 的所有患者,无论其适应症如何:结果:共纳入 50 名患者。平均年龄为 69 ± 10.36 岁,78% 为男性。共针对 99 个电极。每位患者的平均电极数为 1.96 个(1-4 个不等)。从导联植入到取出的时间为 1.1 至 34 年,平均为 8.14 ± 5.71 年(中位数为 7.5 年)。98%的患者和98.99%的导联实现了完全取出。完全手术成功率和临床手术成功率均为 96%。手术失败率为 4%(1 名患者在索引手术后 2 天死亡,1 名患者残留大部分导联)。78%的队列中,TLE的适应症是感染。36名患者(72%)使用了动力机械鞘,27名患者(54%)使用了激光鞘,16名患者(32%)结合使用了激光和机械鞘:结论:TLE的临床和手术成功率很高,主要用于治疗CEID相关感染。结论:主要针对 CEID 相关感染的 TLE 临床和手术成功率很高,三分之一的患者需要同时使用激光和机械鞘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in a Referral Center in Northern Israel.

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasingly being used; thus, there is an increasing need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE).

Objectives: To summarize our experience with TLE at single referral center in northern Israel.

Methods: The study included all patients who underwent TLE at our center between 2019 and 2022, regardless of the indication.

Results: The cohort included 50 patients. The mean age was 69 ± 10.36 years; 78% were males. A total of 99 electrodes were targeted. The mean number of electrodes was 1.96 (range 1-4) per patient. The time between lead implantation and extraction ranged between 1.1 and 34 years with an average of 8.14 ± 5.71 years (median of 7.5 years). Complete lead removal was achieved in 98% of patients and in 98.99% of leads. The complete procedural success rate as well as the clinical procedural success rate was 96%. The procedural failure rate was 4% (1 patient died 2 days after the index procedure and 1 patient remained with large portion of lead). The indication for TLE was infection in 78% of the cohort group. Powered mechanical sheaths were used in 36 patients (72%), laser sheaths in 27 (54%), and a combination of laser and mechanical sheaths in 16 (32%).

Conclusions: The clinical and procedural success rates of TLE, primarily for CEID-related infection, were high. A combination of laser and mechanical sheaths was needed in one-third of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
期刊最新文献
The Use and Abuse of Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Two Cases of Foot Drop Following Liver Transplantation. 3 Letters to Editor. Comparison of Surgical Treatment Using Mohs Micrographic Surgery versus Wide Local Excision for the Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans. Esophageal Lung and VACTERL Association Combined with Dysmorphic Features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1